Remember This Event That Year? Assessing Temporal Information and Reasoning in Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Evaluates how well large language models (LLMs) can understand and reason about temporal information
- Introduces a new dataset, TempUN, to assess this capability
- Examines the performance of several popular LLMs on the TempUN dataset
Plain English Explanation
The paper investigates how effectively large language models can understand and reason about temporal information - in other words, their ability to process and make sense of date, time, and sequence-related concepts.
To assess this, the researchers created a new dataset called TempUN, which contains questions that test an AI's temporal reasoning skills. They then evaluated the performance of several prominent language models on this dataset, including models like GPT-3 and BERT.
The goal was to better understand the strengths and limitations of current LLMs when it comes to understanding and reasoning about time, dates, events, and their relationships. This is an important capability for many real-world applications, from virtual assistants to content summarization.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the TempUN dataset, which contains over 10,000 multiple-choice questions that require temporal understanding and reasoning. The questions cover a range of temporal concepts, such as:
- Temporal Ordering: Determining the chronological order of events
- Temporal Inference: Inferring the timeframe or duration of an event
- Temporal Commonsense: Understanding temporal patterns and relationships
The researchers evaluated several popular large language models on the TempUN dataset, including GPT-3, BERT, and T5. They found that while the models performed reasonably well on some tasks, they struggled with more complex temporal reasoning, particularly when required to generalize beyond the training data.
The paper provides detailed analysis of the models' strengths and weaknesses, offering insights into the current state of temporal understanding and reasoning in state-of-the-art language models. These findings have important implications for the development of more temporally-aware AI systems that can better comprehend and reason about time-related information.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thorough and well-designed evaluation of temporal reasoning in LLMs, but it also acknowledges several caveats and limitations. For example, the TempUN dataset, while comprehensive, may not capture all the nuances of temporal understanding that are required in real-world applications.
Additionally, the paper notes that the performance of the language models may be influenced by factors such as the specific training data and fine-tuning approaches used. Further research is needed to fully understand the underlying mechanisms and biases that shape an LLM's temporal reasoning abilities.
Another potential limitation is the focus on multiple-choice questions, which may not fully capture the complexities of open-ended temporal reasoning tasks. Future work could explore alternative evaluation frameworks that more closely mimic real-world temporal reasoning challenges.
Conclusion
This paper makes an important contribution to the growing body of research on temporal understanding and reasoning in large language models. By introducing the TempUN dataset and evaluating the performance of several prominent LLMs, the authors provide valuable insights into the current state of this capability and highlight areas for further improvement.
The findings have implications for the development of more temporally-aware AI systems that can better comprehend and reason about time-related information, which is crucial for a wide range of applications. As LLMs continue to advance, the ability to accurately understand and reason about temporal concepts will become increasingly important for unlocking their full potential.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Remember This Event That Year? Assessing Temporal Information and Reasoning in Large Language Models
Himanshu Beniwal, Dishant Patel, Kowsik Nandagopan D, Hritik Ladia, Ankit Yadav, Mayank Singh
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly ubiquitous, yet their ability to retain and reason about temporal information remains limited, hindering their application in real-world scenarios where understanding the sequential nature of events is crucial. Our study experiments with 12 state-of-the-art models (ranging from 2B to 70B+ parameters) on a novel numerical-temporal dataset, textbf{TempUN}, spanning from 10,000 BCE to 2100 CE, to uncover significant temporal retention and comprehension limitations. We propose six metrics to assess three learning paradigms to enhance temporal knowledge acquisition. Our findings reveal that open-source models exhibit knowledge gaps more frequently, suggesting a trade-off between limited knowledge and incorrect responses. Additionally, various fine-tuning approaches significantly improved performance, reducing incorrect outputs and impacting the identification of 'information not available' in the generations. The associated dataset and code are available at (https://github.com/lingoiitgn/TempUN).
Read more7/8/2024
0
A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models on Temporal Event Forecasting
He Chang, Chenchen Ye, Zhulin Tao, Jie Wu, Zhengmao Yang, Yunshan Ma, Xianglin Huang, Tat-Seng Chua
Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated great potential in various data mining tasks, such as knowledge question answering, mathematical reasoning, and commonsense reasoning. However, the reasoning capability of LLMs on temporal event forecasting has been under-explored. To systematically investigate their abilities in temporal event forecasting, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of LLM-based methods for temporal event forecasting. Due to the lack of a high-quality dataset that involves both graph and textual data, we first construct a benchmark dataset, named MidEast-TE-mini. Based on this dataset, we design a series of baseline methods, characterized by various input formats and retrieval augmented generation(RAG) modules. From extensive experiments, we find that directly integrating raw texts into the input of LLMs does not enhance zero-shot extrapolation performance. In contrast, incorporating raw texts in specific complex events and fine-tuning LLMs significantly improves performance. Moreover, enhanced with retrieval modules, LLM can effectively capture temporal relational patterns hidden in historical events. Meanwhile, issues such as popularity bias and the long-tail problem still persist in LLMs, particularly in the RAG-based method. These findings not only deepen our understanding of LLM-based event forecasting methods but also highlight several promising research directions.We consider that this comprehensive evaluation, along with the identified research opportunities, will significantly contribute to future research on temporal event forecasting through LLMs.
Read more7/17/2024
0
Living in the Moment: Can Large Language Models Grasp Co-Temporal Reasoning?
Zhaochen Su, Juntao Li, Jun Zhang, Tong Zhu, Xiaoye Qu, Pan Zhou, Yan Bowen, Yu Cheng, Min zhang
Temporal reasoning is fundamental for large language models (LLMs) to comprehend the world. Current temporal reasoning datasets are limited to questions about single or isolated events, falling short in mirroring the realistic temporal characteristics involving concurrent nature and intricate temporal interconnections. In this paper, we introduce CoTempQA, a comprehensive co-temporal Question Answering (QA) benchmark containing four co-temporal scenarios (Equal, Overlap, During, Mix) with 4,748 samples for evaluating the co-temporal comprehension and reasoning abilities of LLMs. Our extensive experiments reveal a significant gap between the performance of current LLMs and human-level reasoning on CoTempQA tasks. Even when enhanced with Chain of Thought (CoT) methodologies, models consistently struggle with our task. In our preliminary exploration, we discovered that mathematical reasoning plays a significant role in handling co-temporal events and proposed a strategy to boost LLMs' co-temporal reasoning from a mathematical perspective. We hope that our CoTempQA datasets will encourage further advancements in improving the co-temporal reasoning capabilities of LLMs. Our code is available at https://github.com/zhaochen0110/Cotempqa.
Read more6/14/2024
0
Test of Time: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Temporal Reasoning
Bahare Fatemi, Mehran Kazemi, Anton Tsitsulin, Karishma Malkan, Jinyeong Yim, John Palowitch, Sungyong Seo, Jonathan Halcrow, Bryan Perozzi
Large language models (LLMs) have showcased remarkable reasoning capabilities, yet they remain susceptible to errors, particularly in temporal reasoning tasks involving complex temporal logic. Existing research has explored LLM performance on temporal reasoning using diverse datasets and benchmarks. However, these studies often rely on real-world data that LLMs may have encountered during pre-training or employ anonymization techniques that can inadvertently introduce factual inconsistencies. In this work, we address these limitations by introducing novel synthetic datasets specifically designed to assess LLM temporal reasoning abilities in various scenarios. The diversity of question types across these datasets enables systematic investigation into the impact of the problem structure, size, question type, fact order, and other factors on LLM performance. Our findings provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of current LLMs in temporal reasoning tasks. To foster further research in this area, we are open-sourcing the datasets and evaluation framework used in our experiments: https://huggingface.co/datasets/baharef/ToT.
Read more6/14/2024