Evidence-Based Temporal Fact Verification
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a method for automatically verifying the temporal accuracy of claims using evidence from the web.
- The authors develop a novel neural network architecture that combines information extraction, textual entailment, and temporal reasoning to determine whether a claim matches the evidence found online.
- The system is evaluated on a new dataset of temporal claims, demonstrating improved performance over existing approaches.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a system that can automatically check whether a claim about when something happened is accurate or not. For example, if someone says "The Eiffel Tower was built in 1920," the system would search the web for evidence and determine that this claim is false, as the Eiffel Tower was actually built in 1889.
To do this, the researchers created a neural network that combines several techniques:
- Information Extraction: The system extracts relevant facts and details from web pages that are related to the claim.
- Textual Entailment: The system determines whether the evidence gathered from the web actually supports or contradicts the claim.
- Temporal Reasoning: The system analyzes the temporal information in the evidence to assess whether the claim's timeline matches the facts.
By bringing these three components together, the system can make an informed decision about whether a claim is temporally accurate or not.
The researchers evaluated their system on a new dataset of temporal claims, and found that it outperformed existing fact-checking approaches. This suggests that their approach is a promising step towards more reliable and explainable automated fact-checking.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces an evidence-based temporal fact verification system that combines information extraction, textual entailment, and temporal reasoning to determine the veracity of claims with temporal aspects.
The system first retrieves relevant evidence from the web for a given claim. It then extracts relevant facts and entities from this evidence using information extraction techniques. Next, it uses a textual entailment model to determine whether the evidence supports or contradicts the claim.
Finally, the system performs temporal reasoning to assess whether the claim's timeline matches the temporal information extracted from the evidence. This involves identifying temporal expressions, ordering events, and determining whether the claim's timeline is consistent with the evidence.
The authors evaluate their system on a new dataset of temporal claims, and show that it outperforms existing fact-checking approaches. They also provide an ablation study to understand the contribution of each component of their system.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach to automated fact-checking, particularly for claims with temporal aspects. The combination of information extraction, textual entailment, and temporal reasoning is a clever way to tackle this problem, and the evaluation results indicate that the system performs well.
One potential limitation is the reliance on web-based evidence, which may not always be comprehensive or reliable. The authors acknowledge this and suggest exploring other evidence sources in future work.
Additionally, the system's performance may be affected by the quality and coverage of the underlying natural language processing models, such as the information extraction and textual entailment components. Further research could explore ways to improve the robustness and generalization of these sub-systems.
Overall, this research represents an important step towards more reliable and explainable automated fact-checking, with potential applications in areas such as journalism, scientific research, and public discourse.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to evidence-based temporal fact verification, which combines information extraction, textual entailment, and temporal reasoning to assess the accuracy of claims with temporal aspects. The system's strong performance on a new dataset of temporal claims suggests that it is a promising step towards more reliable and explainable automated fact-checking.
While the reliance on web-based evidence and the quality of underlying NLP models may present some limitations, the research represents an important contribution to the field of automated fact-checking. As the need for reliable information grows, systems like the one described in this paper could play a crucial role in helping to separate fact from fiction and promote a more informed public discourse.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Evidence-Based Temporal Fact Verification
Anab Maulana Barik, Wynne Hsu, Mong Li Lee
Automated fact verification plays an essential role in fostering trust in the digital space. Despite the growing interest, the verification of temporal facts has not received much attention in the community. Temporal fact verification brings new challenges where cues of the temporal information need to be extracted and temporal reasoning involving various temporal aspects of the text must be applied. In this work, we propose an end-to-end solution for temporal fact verification that considers the temporal information in claims to obtain relevant evidence sentences and harness the power of large language model for temporal reasoning. Recognizing that temporal facts often involve events, we model these events in the claim and evidence sentences. We curate two temporal fact datasets to learn time-sensitive representations that encapsulate not only the semantic relationships among the events, but also their chronological proximity. This allows us to retrieve the top-k relevant evidence sentences and provide the context for a large language model to perform temporal reasoning and outputs whether a claim is supported or refuted by the retrieved evidence sentences. Experiment results demonstrate that the proposed approach significantly enhances the accuracy of temporal claim verification, thereby advancing current state-of-the-art in automated fact verification.
Read more8/20/2024
0
Robust Claim Verification Through Fact Detection
Nazanin Jafari, James Allan
Claim verification can be a challenging task. In this paper, we present a method to enhance the robustness and reasoning capabilities of automated claim verification through the extraction of short facts from evidence. Our novel approach, FactDetect, leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate concise factual statements from evidence and label these facts based on their semantic relevance to the claim and evidence. The generated facts are then combined with the claim and evidence. To train a lightweight supervised model, we incorporate a fact-detection task into the claim verification process as a multitasking approach to improve both performance and explainability. We also show that augmenting FactDetect in the claim verification prompt enhances performance in zero-shot claim verification using LLMs. Our method demonstrates competitive results in the supervised claim verification model by 15% on the F1 score when evaluated for challenging scientific claim verification datasets. We also demonstrate that FactDetect can be augmented with claim and evidence for zero-shot prompting (AugFactDetect) in LLMs for verdict prediction. We show that AugFactDetect outperforms the baseline with statistical significance on three challenging scientific claim verification datasets with an average of 17.3% performance gain compared to the best performing baselines.
Read more7/29/2024
0
Fact or Fiction? Improving Fact Verification with Knowledge Graphs through Simplified Subgraph Retrievals
Tobias A. Opsahl
Despite recent success in natural language processing (NLP), fact verification still remains a difficult task. Due to misinformation spreading increasingly fast, attention has been directed towards automatically verifying the correctness of claims. In the domain of NLP, this is usually done by training supervised machine learning models to verify claims by utilizing evidence from trustworthy corpora. We present efficient methods for verifying claims on a dataset where the evidence is in the form of structured knowledge graphs. We use the FactKG dataset, which is constructed from the DBpedia knowledge graph extracted from Wikipedia. By simplifying the evidence retrieval process, from fine-tuned language models to simple logical retrievals, we are able to construct models that both require less computational resources and achieve better test-set accuracy.
Read more8/15/2024
0
Remember This Event That Year? Assessing Temporal Information and Reasoning in Large Language Models
Himanshu Beniwal, Dishant Patel, Kowsik Nandagopan D, Hritik Ladia, Ankit Yadav, Mayank Singh
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly ubiquitous, yet their ability to retain and reason about temporal information remains limited, hindering their application in real-world scenarios where understanding the sequential nature of events is crucial. Our study experiments with 12 state-of-the-art models (ranging from 2B to 70B+ parameters) on a novel numerical-temporal dataset, textbf{TempUN}, spanning from 10,000 BCE to 2100 CE, to uncover significant temporal retention and comprehension limitations. We propose six metrics to assess three learning paradigms to enhance temporal knowledge acquisition. Our findings reveal that open-source models exhibit knowledge gaps more frequently, suggesting a trade-off between limited knowledge and incorrect responses. Additionally, various fine-tuning approaches significantly improved performance, reducing incorrect outputs and impacting the identification of 'information not available' in the generations. The associated dataset and code are available at (https://github.com/lingoiitgn/TempUN).
Read more7/8/2024