Fair Machine Learning for Healthcare Requires Recognizing the Intersectionality of Sociodemographic Factors, a Case Study
0
👀
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Researchers investigated the effect of patient socioeconomic status (SES), race, and sex on schizophrenia (SCZ) diagnosis rates.
- They used a large dataset from the Mount Sinai Health System in New York City and a logistic regression model.
- The findings showed significant interactions between patient SES, race, and sex in relation to SCZ diagnosis.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers were interested in understanding how a patient's background and personal characteristics might impact their chances of being diagnosed with schizophrenia (SCZ), a serious mental health condition. They looked at factors like a patient's socioeconomic status (SES), race, and sex, and how these characteristics might interact to influence SCZ diagnosis rates.
The researchers used a large dataset of patients from a major healthcare system in New York City. They applied a statistical technique called logistic regression to analyze the data and uncover any patterns or relationships. What they found was quite interesting:
- For Black American patients, higher SES was associated with a greater likelihood of being diagnosed with SCZ.
- In contrast, for white American patients, higher SES acted as a "protective factor" and was linked to a lower probability of SCZ diagnosis.
These results suggest that the intersection of a patient's race, SES, and other demographic factors can play an important role in their healthcare experiences and outcomes. The researchers argue that building fair AI tools for healthcare requires recognizing and accounting for these complex, interconnected social and economic factors.
Technical Explanation
The researchers utilized a large cohort of patients from the Mount Sinai Health System in New York City to investigate the relationship between patient socioeconomic status (SES), race, sex, and schizophrenia (SCZ) diagnosis rates. They employed a logistic regression model to analyze the data and assess the interactions between these factors.
The results showed that patient SES, race, and sex had significant interactions in relation to SCZ diagnosis. Specifically, the researchers found that increased SES was associated with a higher probability of obtaining a SCZ diagnosis for Black American patients. Conversely, higher SES acted as a protective factor, reducing the likelihood of SCZ diagnosis for white American patients.
These findings highlight the importance of considering the intersectionality of sociodemographic factors when developing fair AI tools for healthcare applications. The researchers emphasize that further investigation is needed to reliably explain and quantify these observed health disparities.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that more work is needed to fully understand and quantify the health disparities observed in their study. While the logistic regression model revealed significant interactions between patient SES, race, and sex in relation to schizophrenia (SCZ) diagnosis, the underlying mechanisms driving these patterns are not yet clearly explained.
Additional research is required to reliably determine the factors contributing to the observed differences in SCZ diagnosis rates across sociodemographic groups. The researchers note that their study was limited to a single healthcare system in New York City, and it would be valuable to expand the analysis to other populations and regions to assess the generalizability of the findings.
Furthermore, the researchers emphasize the importance of recognizing the intersectionality of sociodemographic factors when developing fair AI tools for healthcare applications. The complex interplay between patient characteristics highlights the need for a more nuanced, holistic approach to addressing healthcare inequities.
Conclusion
This study provides valuable insights into the relationship between patient socioeconomic status (SES), race, sex, and schizophrenia (SCZ) diagnosis rates. The findings suggest that the intersection of these sociodemographic factors can significantly impact healthcare experiences and outcomes, with higher SES acting as a protective factor for white American patients but not for Black American patients.
The researchers advocate for the importance of recognizing the intersectionality of sociodemographic factors when developing fair AI tools for healthcare applications. Further research is needed to fully understand and address the complex health disparities observed in this study, but the study highlights the critical need to consider the multifaceted nature of social determinants of health when designing equitable healthcare systems and technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
👀
0
Fair Machine Learning for Healthcare Requires Recognizing the Intersectionality of Sociodemographic Factors, a Case Study
Alissa A. Valentine, Alexander W. Charney, Isotta Landi
As interest in implementing artificial intelligence (AI) in medical systems grows, discussion continues on how to evaluate the fairness of these systems, or the disparities they may perpetuate. Socioeconomic status (SES) is commonly included in machine learning models to control for health inequities, with the underlying assumption that increased SES is associated with better health. In this work, we considered a large cohort of patients from the Mount Sinai Health System in New York City to investigate the effect of patient SES, race, and sex on schizophrenia (SCZ) diagnosis rates via a logistic regression model. Within an intersectional framework, patient SES, race, and sex were found to have significant interactions. Our findings showed that increased SES is associated with a higher probability of obtaining a SCZ diagnosis in Black Americans ($beta=4.1times10^{-8}$, $SE=4.5times10^{-9}$, $p < 0.001$). Whereas high SES acts as a protective factor for SCZ diagnosis in White Americans ($beta=-4.1times10^{-8}$, $SE=6.7times10^{-9}$, $p < 0.001$). Further investigation is needed to reliably explain and quantify health disparities. Nevertheless, we advocate that building fair AI tools for the health care space requires recognizing the intersectionality of sociodemographic factors.
Read more7/23/2024
0
Quantifying the Cross-sectoral Intersecting Discrepancies within Multiple Groups Using Latent Class Analysis Towards Fairness
Yingfang Yuan, Kefan Chen, Mehdi Rizvi, Lynne Baillie, Wei Pang
The growing interest in fair AI development is evident. The ''Leave No One Behind'' initiative urges us to address multiple and intersecting forms of inequality in accessing services, resources, and opportunities, emphasising the significance of fairness in AI. This is particularly relevant as an increasing number of AI tools are applied to decision-making processes, such as resource allocation and service scheme development, across various sectors such as health, energy, and housing. Therefore, exploring joint inequalities in these sectors is significant and valuable for thoroughly understanding overall inequality and unfairness. This research introduces an innovative approach to quantify cross-sectoral intersecting discrepancies among user-defined groups using latent class analysis. These discrepancies can be used to approximate inequality and provide valuable insights to fairness issues. We validate our approach using both proprietary and public datasets, including EVENS and Census 2021 (England & Wales) datasets, to examine cross-sectoral intersecting discrepancies among different ethnic groups. We also verify the reliability of the quantified discrepancy by conducting a correlation analysis with a government public metric. Our findings reveal significant discrepancies between minority ethnic groups, highlighting the need for targeted interventions in real-world AI applications. Additionally, we demonstrate how the proposed approach can be used to provide insights into the fairness of machine learning.
Read more7/12/2024
✅
0
AI-Driven Healthcare: A Survey on Ensuring Fairness and Mitigating Bias
Sribala Vidyadhari Chinta, Zichong Wang, Xingyu Zhang, Thang Doan Viet, Ayesha Kashif, Monique Antoinette Smith, Wenbin Zhang
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly advancing in healthcare, enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of services across various specialties, including cardiology, ophthalmology, dermatology, emergency medicine, etc. AI applications have significantly improved diagnostic accuracy, treatment personalization, and patient outcome predictions by leveraging technologies such as machine learning, neural networks, and natural language processing. However, these advancements also introduce substantial ethical and fairness challenges, particularly related to biases in data and algorithms. These biases can lead to disparities in healthcare delivery, affecting diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes across different demographic groups. This survey paper examines the integration of AI in healthcare, highlighting critical challenges related to bias and exploring strategies for mitigation. We emphasize the necessity of diverse datasets, fairness-aware algorithms, and regulatory frameworks to ensure equitable healthcare delivery. The paper concludes with recommendations for future research, advocating for interdisciplinary approaches, transparency in AI decision-making, and the development of innovative and inclusive AI applications.
Read more7/30/2024
0
A tutorial on fairness in machine learning in healthcare
Jianhui Gao, Benson Chou, Zachary R. McCaw, Hilary Thurston, Paul Varghese, Chuan Hong, Jessica Gronsbell
$textbf{OBJECTIVE}$: Ensuring that machine learning (ML) algorithms are safe and effective within all patient groups, and do not disadvantage particular patients, is essential to clinical decision making and preventing the reinforcement of existing healthcare inequities. The objective of this tutorial is to introduce the medical informatics community to the common notions of fairness within ML, focusing on clinical applications and implementation in practice. $textbf{TARGET AUDIENCE}$: As gaps in fairness arise in a variety of healthcare applications, this tutorial is designed to provide an understanding of fairness, without assuming prior knowledge, to researchers and clinicians who make use of modern clinical data. $textbf{SCOPE}$: We describe the fundamental concepts and methods used to define fairness in ML, including an overview of why models in healthcare may be unfair, a summary and comparison of the metrics used to quantify fairness, and a discussion of some ongoing research. We illustrate some of the fairness methods introduced through a case study of mortality prediction in a publicly available electronic health record dataset. Finally, we provide a user-friendly R package for comprehensive group fairness evaluation, enabling researchers and clinicians to assess fairness in their own ML work.
Read more6/18/2024