Quantifying the Impact of Population Shift Across Age and Sex for Abdominal Organ Segmentation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines how changes in the age and sex distribution of the population can impact the performance of abdominal organ segmentation models.
- The researchers evaluated the performance of several state-of-the-art segmentation models across different age and sex subgroups to quantify the impact of population shift.
- Their findings highlight the importance of addressing demographic factors to ensure fairness and robustness in medical image analysis.
Plain English Explanation
Medical imaging AI models are often trained on datasets that may not fully represent the diversity of the real-world population. This can lead to biases and performance disparities across different age and sex groups.
In this study, the researchers investigated how shifts in the age and sex distribution of the population can affect the performance of abdominal organ segmentation models. Abdominal CT scans are commonly used in medical diagnosis and treatment planning, so ensuring these AI models work equally well for all patients is crucial.
The researchers evaluated several state-of-the-art segmentation models on a diverse dataset, breaking down the results by age and sex. They found that model performance can vary significantly depending on the demographic characteristics of the patients. For example, the models may struggle more with accurately segmenting organs in older adults or individuals of a certain sex.
These findings highlight the importance of considering population diversity and fairness when developing medical imaging AI. By understanding the impact of demographic factors, researchers and developers can work to build more robust and equitable AI systems that provide consistent performance for all patients, regardless of their age or sex.
Technical Explanation
The researchers evaluated the performance of several state-of-the-art abdominal organ segmentation models, including UNet, TransUNet, and nnUNet, on a diverse dataset spanning a wide range of ages and both sexes. They broke down the model performance across different age and sex subgroups to quantify the impact of population shift.
The experiments revealed that model performance can vary significantly depending on the demographic characteristics of the patients. For example, the segmentation models tended to struggle more with accurately identifying organs in older adults or individuals of a certain sex. This suggests that the training data used to develop these models may not have fully captured the diversity of the real-world population.
To address this issue, the researchers propose strategies to improve the robustness and fairness of abdominal organ segmentation models. This could involve techniques like targeted data collection, data augmentation, and model fine-tuning to ensure consistent performance across different age and sex subgroups.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that their study is limited to a single dataset and a specific set of segmentation models. It would be beneficial to expand the analysis to include a wider range of datasets, models, and demographic factors to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of population shift on abdominal organ segmentation.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential causes of the observed performance disparities, such as differences in organ size, shape, or anatomical variability across age and sex groups. Investigating these underlying factors could provide valuable insights for developing more robust and equitable segmentation models.
While the researchers propose several strategies to address the fairness and robustness issues, they do not provide a detailed implementation or evaluation of these approaches. Further research is needed to validate the effectiveness of these techniques in real-world clinical settings.
Conclusion
This study highlights the importance of considering population diversity and fairness when developing medical imaging AI systems. The researchers found that the performance of abdominal organ segmentation models can be significantly impacted by shifts in the age and sex distribution of the population.
By quantifying these demographic-based performance disparities, the study underscores the need for more inclusive and representative training data, as well as targeted techniques to improve the robustness and fairness of these AI models. Addressing these challenges is crucial to ensure that medical imaging AI can provide consistent and equitable support for all patients, regardless of their age or sex.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Quantifying the Impact of Population Shift Across Age and Sex for Abdominal Organ Segmentation
Kate v{C}evora, Ben Glocker, Wenjia Bai
Deep learning-based medical image segmentation has seen tremendous progress over the last decade, but there is still relatively little transfer into clinical practice. One of the main barriers is the challenge of domain generalisation, which requires segmentation models to maintain high performance across a wide distribution of image data. This challenge is amplified by the many factors that contribute to the diverse appearance of medical images, such as acquisition conditions and patient characteristics. The impact of shifting patient characteristics such as age and sex on segmentation performance remains relatively under-studied, especially for abdominal organs, despite that this is crucial for ensuring the fairness of the segmentation model. We perform the first study to determine the impact of population shift with respect to age and sex on abdominal CT image segmentation, by leveraging two large public datasets, and introduce a novel metric to quantify the impact. We find that population shift is a challenge similar in magnitude to cross-dataset shift for abdominal organ segmentation, and that the effect is asymmetric and dataset-dependent. We conclude that dataset diversity in terms of known patient characteristics is not necessarily equivalent to dataset diversity in terms of image features. This implies that simple population matching to ensure good generalisation and fairness may be insufficient, and we recommend that fairness research should be directed towards better understanding and quantifying medical image dataset diversity in terms of performance-relevant characteristics such as organ morphology.
Read more8/9/2024
0
Unlocking Robust Segmentation Across All Age Groups via Continual Learning
Chih-Ying Liu, Jeya Maria Jose Valanarasu, Camila Gonzalez, Curtis Langlotz, Andrew Ng, Sergios Gatidis
Most deep learning models in medical imaging are trained on adult data with unclear performance on pediatric images. In this work, we aim to address this challenge in the context of automated anatomy segmentation in whole-body Computed Tomography (CT). We evaluate the performance of CT organ segmentation algorithms trained on adult data when applied to pediatric CT volumes and identify substantial age-dependent underperformance. We subsequently propose and evaluate strategies, including data augmentation and continual learning approaches, to achieve good segmentation accuracy across all age groups. Our best-performing model, trained using continual learning, achieves high segmentation accuracy on both adult and pediatric data (Dice scores of 0.90 and 0.84 respectively).
Read more4/23/2024
0
Rethinking Abdominal Organ Segmentation (RAOS) in the clinical scenario: A robustness evaluation benchmark with challenging cases
Xiangde Luo, Zihan Li, Shaoting Zhang, Wenjun Liao, Guotai Wang
Deep learning has enabled great strides in abdominal multi-organ segmentation, even surpassing junior oncologists on common cases or organs. However, robustness on corner cases and complex organs remains a challenging open problem for clinical adoption. To investigate model robustness, we collected and annotated the RAOS dataset comprising 413 CT scans ($sim$80k 2D images, $sim$8k 3D organ annotations) from 413 patients each with 17 (female) or 19 (male) labelled organs, manually delineated by oncologists. We grouped scans based on clinical information into 1) diagnosis/radiotherapy (317 volumes), 2) partial excision without the whole organ missing (22 volumes), and 3) excision with the whole organ missing (74 volumes). RAOS provides a potential benchmark for evaluating model robustness including organ hallucination. It also includes some organs that can be very hard to access on public datasets like the rectum, colon, intestine, prostate and seminal vesicles. We benchmarked several state-of-the-art methods in these three clinical groups to evaluate performance and robustness. We also assessed cross-generalization between RAOS and three public datasets. This dataset and comprehensive analysis establish a potential baseline for future robustness research: url{https://github.com/Luoxd1996/RAOS}.
Read more6/21/2024
👨🏫
0
Strategies to Improve Real-World Applicability of Laparoscopic Anatomy Segmentation Models
Fiona R. Kolbinger, Jiangpeng He, Jinge Ma, Fengqing Zhu
Accurate identification and localization of anatomical structures of varying size and appearance in laparoscopic imaging are necessary to leverage the potential of computer vision techniques for surgical decision support. Segmentation performance of such models is traditionally reported using metrics of overlap such as IoU. However, imbalanced and unrealistic representation of classes in the training data and suboptimal selection of reported metrics have the potential to skew nominal segmentation performance and thereby ultimately limit clinical translation. In this work, we systematically analyze the impact of class characteristics (i.e., organ size differences), training and test data composition (i.e., representation of positive and negative examples), and modeling parameters (i.e., foreground-to-background class weight) on eight segmentation metrics: accuracy, precision, recall, IoU, F1 score (Dice Similarity Coefficient), specificity, Hausdorff Distance, and Average Symmetric Surface Distance. Our findings support two adjustments to account for data biases in surgical data science: First, training on datasets that are similar to the clinical real-world scenarios in terms of class distribution, and second, class weight adjustments to optimize segmentation model performance with regard to metrics of particular relevance in the respective clinical setting.
Read more4/16/2024