A quantitative model of takeover request time budget for conditionally automated driving

Read original: arXiv:2408.15682 - Published 8/29/2024 by Foghor Tanshi, Dirk Soffker
Total Score

0

A quantitative model of takeover request time budget for conditionally automated driving

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a quantitative model for determining the appropriate time budget for a driver takeover request in conditionally automated driving scenarios.
  • The model considers factors such as driver attention, reaction time, and the complexity of the driving situation to estimate the required takeover time.
  • The goal is to ensure the driver has sufficient time to safely resume control of the vehicle when the automated system requests a handover.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on conditionally automated driving, where the car can handle most driving tasks, but the human driver needs to be ready to take over control when the system requests it. The key challenge is determining how much time the driver should have to respond to a takeover request.

The researchers developed a mathematical model to calculate this "takeover time budget". The model takes into account several important factors:

  • Driver attention - how focused the driver is on the driving task at the time of the takeover request
  • Reaction time - how quickly the driver can start regaining control of the vehicle
  • Driving situation complexity - how difficult the current driving conditions are, which affects the time needed to safely resume control

By considering these elements, the model can estimate the appropriate amount of time the driver needs to take over from the automated system. The goal is to ensure the driver has sufficient time to safely resume control of the vehicle when needed.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a quantitative model for determining the takeover request time budget in conditionally automated driving scenarios. The model accounts for three key factors:

  1. Driver attention: The model considers the driver's current state of attention and vigilance, which can impact their reaction time and ability to resume control. This builds on prior research on non-driving-related tasks and their influence on driver takeovers.

  2. Driver reaction time: The time required for the driver to start regaining control of the vehicle after a takeover request. The model incorporates findings on driver response times in similar situations.

  3. Driving situation complexity: The difficulty of the current driving context, which affects the time needed for the driver to safely resume manual control. This builds on research into context-aware modeling of driver situation awareness.

By combining these factors, the model can estimate the appropriate time budget for a takeover request to ensure the driver has sufficient time to safely resume control of the vehicle. This is critical for optimizing the safety and user experience of conditionally automated driving systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a well-designed quantitative model for determining takeover request time budgets in conditionally automated driving. The inclusion of key factors like driver attention, reaction time, and driving situation complexity is a strength, as these elements significantly impact the human's ability to resume control.

However, the model does not address some potential limitations:

Additionally, the paper could benefit from more discussion on the practical implementation challenges, such as accurately measuring driver attention and situation awareness in real-world settings. Further research and user studies would help to fully validate the model's effectiveness.

Conclusion

This paper presents a valuable quantitative model for determining the appropriate time budget for driver takeover requests in conditionally automated driving. By accounting for key factors like driver attention, reaction time, and driving situation complexity, the model can help ensure the driver has sufficient time to safely resume control of the vehicle when needed.

While the model has some limitations, it represents an important step forward in optimizing the safety and user experience of conditionally automated driving systems. The insights from this research could inform the design of future advanced driver assistance technologies and contribute to the broader efforts to make partially automated vehicles more reliable and trustworthy.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

A quantitative model of takeover request time budget for conditionally automated driving
Total Score

0

A quantitative model of takeover request time budget for conditionally automated driving

Foghor Tanshi, Dirk Soffker

In conditional automation, the automated driving system assumes full control and only issues a takeover request to a human driver to resume driving in critical situations. Previous studies have concluded that the time budget required by drivers to resume driving after a takeover request varies with situations and different takeover variables. However, no comprehensive generalized approaches for estimating in advance the time budget required by drivers to takeover have been provided. In this contribution, fixed (7 s) and variable time budgets (6 s, 5 s, and 4 s) with and without visual imagery assistance were investigated for suitability in three takeover scenarios using performance measures such as average lateral displacement. The results indicate that 7 s is suitable for two of the studied scenarios based on their characteristics. Using the obtained results and known relations between takeover variables, a mathematical formula for estimating takeover request time budget is proposed. The proposed formula integrates individual stimulus response time, driving experience, scenario specific requirements and allows increased safety for takeover maneuvers. Furthermore, the visual imagery resulted in increased takeover time which invariably increases the time budget. Thus the time demand of the visualized information if applicable (such as visual imagery) should be included in the time budget.

Read more

8/29/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Non-Driving-Related Tasks Influencing Drivers' Takeover Time: A Meta-Analysis

Yan Zhang

Before the era of fully automated vehicles, human is consistently an indispensable part of the driving system. Various studies have investigated drivers' cooperation with the vehicle under different conditions. In this article, we analyzed how non-driving-related tasks (NDRT) influence takeover time (TOT) by conducting a meta-analysis on 37 related papers. NDRTs were transcoded into combinations of five basic dimensions to unify and demonstrate their effects on drivers. In order to interpret experimental data comprehensively, we implemented three methods. A synthetical analysis was conducted to compare the effect size between each study and subgroup. Studies with eligible control groups have been examined by the two-group analysis, followed by moderator analysis on seven variables. The results from the two-group analysis showed that both visual-mental-motoric and visual-mental tasks have significant negative effects on the takeover time and the previous type had a larger effect than the latter one. Moreover, the subgroup comparison and meta-regression in the meta-analysis part revealed the correlation between moderators and the effect size, in which the Driving Experience and the Automation Level affected the relation between NDRT and TOT. The findings of this paper can contribute to the improvement and new directions for further scientific research and engineering design.

Read more

5/30/2024

⛏️

Total Score

0

Text a Bit Longer or Drive Now? Resuming Driving after Texting in Conditionally Automated Cars

Nabil Al Nahin Ch, Jared Fortier, Christian P. Janssen, Orit Shaer, Caitlin Mills, Andrew L. Kun

In this study, we focus on different strategies drivers use in terms of interleaving between driving and non-driving related tasks (NDRT) while taking back control from automated driving. We conducted two driving simulator experiments to examine how different cognitive demands of texting, priorities, and takeover time budgets affect drivers' takeover strategies. We also evaluated how different takeover strategies affect takeover performance. We found that the choice of takeover strategy was influenced by the priority and takeover time budget but not by the cognitive demand of the NDRT. The takeover strategy did not have any effect on takeover quality or NDRT engagement but influenced takeover timing.

Read more

8/13/2024

The Design of Informative Take-Over Requests for Semi-Autonomous Cyber-Physical Systems: Combining Spoken Language and Visual Icons in a Drone-Controller Setting
Total Score

0

The Design of Informative Take-Over Requests for Semi-Autonomous Cyber-Physical Systems: Combining Spoken Language and Visual Icons in a Drone-Controller Setting

Ashwini Gundappa, Emilia Ellsiepen, Lukas Schmitz, Frederik Wiehr, Vera Demberg

The question of how cyber-physical systems should interact with human partners that can take over control or exert oversight is becoming more pressing, as these systems are deployed for an ever larger range of tasks. Drawing on the literatures on handing over control during semi-autonomous driving and human-robot interaction, we propose a design of a take-over request that combines an abstract pre-alert with an informative TOR: Relevant sensor information is highlighted on the controller's display, while a spoken message verbalizes the reason for the TOR. We conduct our study in the context of a semi-autonomous drone control scenario as our testbed. The goal of our online study is to assess in more detail what form a language-based TOR should take. Specifically, we compare a full sentence condition to shorter fragments, and test whether the visual highlighting should be done synchronously or asynchronously with the speech. Participants showed a higher accuracy in choosing the correct solution with our bi-modal TOR and felt that they were better able to recognize the critical situation. Using only fragments in the spoken message rather than full sentences did not lead to improved accuracy or faster reactions. Also, synchronizing the visual highlighting with the spoken message did not result in better accuracy and response times were even increased in this condition.

Read more

9/16/2024