Quantum Algorithms for Weighted Constrained Sampling and Weighted Model Counting

Read original: arXiv:2407.12816 - Published 7/19/2024 by Fabrizio Riguzzi

📈

Overview

This paper introduces a new approach for lifted weighted model counting, which aims to efficiently compute the weighted number of models that satisfy a given logical formula.
The authors propose a novel algorithm called "lifted algorithms for symmetric weighted first-order model counting" that can perform inference on complex relational data more efficiently than previous methods.
The paper also discusses connections between weighted model counting and other computational problems, such as bridging weighted first-order model counting and graph sampling and formally certified approximate model counting.

Plain English Explanation

In this paper, the researchers present a new technique for efficiently counting the number of possible solutions, or "models", that satisfy a given logical problem. This is a challenging computational task, especially when dealing with complex relational data involving multiple objects and their relationships.

The key innovation is a new algorithm called "lifted algorithms for symmetric weighted first-order model counting". This algorithm is able to take advantage of symmetries and repetitive patterns in the data to perform the model counting much more efficiently than previous approaches.

The paper also explores connections between this weighted model counting problem and other important computational problems, such as sampling from graph-structured data and approximating the number of satisfying models. By understanding these connections, the researchers hope to develop more powerful and versatile tools for working with complex relational data.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a novel algorithm for lifted weighted model counting, which aims to efficiently compute the weighted number of models that satisfy a given logical formula expressed in first-order logic.

The key ideas are:

Symmetry-aware reasoning: The algorithm exploits symmetries in the problem structure to avoid redundant computations and achieve substantial efficiency gains.
Weighted model counting: The algorithm can handle weighted models, where each model is assigned a numerical weight, rather than just counting the number of satisfying models.
Lifting: The algorithm performs inference at a "lifted" level, reasoning about entire groups of symmetric objects simultaneously, rather than individually.

The paper also discusses connections to other related problems, such as bridging weighted first-order model counting and graph sampling and formally certified approximate model counting. By understanding these connections, the researchers aim to develop a more unified computational framework for working with complex relational data.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising new approach for lifted weighted model counting, with potential applications in areas like probabilistic inference, knowledge representation, and decision-making. The key strengths of the proposed algorithm include its ability to exploit symmetries and its handling of weighted models.

However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. For example, the current algorithm is limited to a specific class of logical formulas (those with symmetric weight functions), and it may not scale well to extremely large or complex problem instances.

Additionally, while the paper discusses connections to other related problems, it does not provide a comprehensive theoretical analysis of the relationships between these different computational tasks. Further research is needed to fully understand the implications and broader applicability of the proposed techniques.

Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in the field of lifted inference and weighted model counting. By challenging and questioning certain aspects of the research, we can help drive the development of more robust and versatile tools for working with complex relational data.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel algorithm for lifted weighted model counting, which can efficiently compute the weighted number of models that satisfy a given logical formula. The key innovations include the ability to exploit symmetries in the problem structure and the handling of weighted models.

The paper also discusses connections between weighted model counting and other important computational problems, such as graph sampling and approximate model counting. By understanding these connections, the researchers hope to develop a more unified framework for working with complex relational data.

While the proposed algorithm has promising capabilities, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. Continued exploration and critical analysis of this line of work can help advance the state of the art in lifted inference and relational reasoning.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📈

Quantum Algorithms for Weighted Constrained Sampling and Weighted Model Counting

Fabrizio Riguzzi

We consider the problems of weighted constrained sampling and weighted model counting, where we are given a propositional formula and a weight for each world. The first problem consists of sampling worlds with a probability proportional to their weight given that the formula is satisfied. The latter is the problem of computing the sum of the weights of the models of the formula. Both have applications in many fields such as probabilistic reasoning, graphical models, statistical physics, statistics and hardware verification. In this article, we propose QWCS and QWMC, quantum algorithms for performing weighted constrained sampling and weighted model counting, respectively. Both are based on the quantum search/quantum model counting algorithms that are modified to take into account the weights. In the black box model of computation, where we can only query an oracle for evaluating the Boolean function given an assignment, QWCS requires $O(2^{frac{n}{2}}+1/sqrt{text{WMC}})$ oracle calls, where where $n$ is the number of Boolean variables and $text{WMC}$ is the normalized between 0 and 1 weighted model count of the formula, while a classical algorithm has a complexity of $Omega(1/text{WMC})$. QWMC takes $Theta(2^{frac{n}{2}})$ oracle calss, while classically the best complexity is $Theta(2^n)$, thus achieving a quadratic speedup.

7/19/2024

📈

Lifted Algorithms for Symmetric Weighted First-Order Model Sampling

Yuanhong Wang, Juhua Pu, Yuyi Wang, Ondv{r}ej Kuv{z}elka

Weighted model counting (WMC) is the task of computing the weighted sum of all satisfying assignments (i.e., models) of a propositional formula. Similarly, weighted model sampling (WMS) aims to randomly generate models with probability proportional to their respective weights. Both WMC and WMS are hard to solve exactly, falling under the $#mathsf{P}$-hard complexity class. However, it is known that the counting problem may sometimes be tractable, if the propositional formula can be compactly represented and expressed in first-order logic. In such cases, model counting problems can be solved in time polynomial in the domain size, and are known as domain-liftable. The following question then arises: Is it also the case for weighted model sampling? This paper addresses this question and answers it affirmatively. Specifically, we prove the domain-liftability under sampling for the two-variables fragment of first-order logic with counting quantifiers in this paper, by devising an efficient sampling algorithm for this fragment that runs in time polynomial in the domain size. We then further show that this result continues to hold even in the presence of cardinality constraints. To empirically verify our approach, we conduct experiments over various first-order formulas designed for the uniform generation of combinatorial structures and sampling in statistical-relational models. The results demonstrate that our algorithm outperforms a start-of-the-art WMS sampler by a substantial margin, confirming the theoretical results.

6/17/2024

Bridging Weighted First Order Model Counting and Graph Polynomials

Qipeng Kuang, Ondv{r}ej Kuv{z}elka, Yuanhong Wang, Yuyi Wang

The Weighted First-Order Model Counting Problem (WFOMC) asks to compute the weighted sum of models of a given first-order logic sentence over a given domain. It can be solved in time polynomial in the domain size for sentences from the two-variable fragment with counting quantifiers, known as $C^2$. This polynomial-time complexity is also retained when extending $C^2$ by one of the following axioms: linear order axiom, tree axiom, forest axiom, directed acyclic graph axiom or connectedness axiom. An interesting question remains as to which other axioms can be added to the first-order sentences in this way. We provide a new perspective on this problem by associating WFOMC with graph polynomials. Using WFOMC, we define Weak Connectedness Polynomial and Strong Connectedness Polynomials for first-order logic sentences. It turns out that these polynomials have the following interesting properties. First, they can be computed in polynomial time in the domain size for sentences from $C^2$. Second, we can use them to solve WFOMC with all of the existing axioms known to be tractable as well as with new ones such as bipartiteness, strong connectedness, being a spanning subgraph, having $k$ connected components, etc. Third, the well-known Tutte polynomial can be recovered as a special case of the Weak Connectedness Polynomial, and the Strict and Non-Strict Directed Chromatic Polynomials can be recovered from the Strong Connectedness Polynomials, which allows us to show that these important graph polynomials can be computed in time polynomial in the number of vertices for any graph that can be encoded by a fixed $C^2$ sentence and a conjunction of an arbitrary number of ground unary literals.

7/17/2024

Formally Certified Approximate Model Counting

Yong Kiam Tan, Jiong Yang, Mate Soos, Magnus O. Myreen, Kuldeep S. Meel

Approximate model counting is the task of approximating the number of solutions to an input Boolean formula. The state-of-the-art approximate model counter for formulas in conjunctive normal form (CNF), ApproxMC, provides a scalable means of obtaining model counts with probably approximately correct (PAC)-style guarantees. Nevertheless, the validity of ApproxMC's approximation relies on a careful theoretical analysis of its randomized algorithm and the correctness of its highly optimized implementation, especially the latter's stateful interactions with an incremental CNF satisfiability solver capable of natively handling parity (XOR) constraints. We present the first certification framework for approximate model counting with formally verified guarantees on the quality of its output approximation. Our approach combines: (i) a static, once-off, formal proof of the algorithm's PAC guarantee in the Isabelle/HOL proof assistant; and (ii) dynamic, per-run, verification of ApproxMC's calls to an external CNF-XOR solver using proof certificates. We detail our general approach to establish a rigorous connection between these two parts of the verification, including our blueprint for turning the formalized, randomized algorithm into a verified proof checker, and our design of proof certificates for both ApproxMC and its internal CNF-XOR solving steps. Experimentally, we show that certificate generation adds little overhead to an approximate counter implementation, and that our certificate checker is able to fully certify $84.7%$ of instances with generated certificates when given the same time and memory limits as the counter.

6/21/2024