Random Latent Exploration for Deep Reinforcement Learning

Read original: arXiv:2407.13755 - Published 7/19/2024 by Srinath Mahankali, Zhang-Wei Hong, Ayush Sekhari, Alexander Rakhlin, Pulkit Agrawal
Total Score

0

Random Latent Exploration for Deep Reinforcement Learning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

• This paper proposes a novel approach called Random Latent Exploration (RLE) for deep reinforcement learning, which aims to improve exploration and sample efficiency.

• RLE leverages a generative model to explore the latent space and generate diverse actions, encouraging the agent to discover new and more rewarding states.

• The authors demonstrate that RLE outperforms standard exploration methods in several challenging continuous control tasks, highlighting its potential to accelerate research in intrinsically motivated reinforcement learning.

Plain English Explanation

In reinforcement learning, the agent (such as a robot or software program) needs to explore its environment to discover valuable actions and maximize its rewards. However, traditional exploration methods, like random actions or epsilon-greedy, can be inefficient, leading to slow learning.

The authors of this paper introduce a new exploration technique called Random Latent Exploration (RLE). RLE uses a generative model, which is a type of machine learning model that can create new data similar to the training data. In this case, the generative model learns to create diverse actions that the agent can try out.

The key idea behind RLE is to explore the "latent space" of the generative model. The latent space is a compressed representation of the input data, which can capture hidden patterns and structures. By randomly sampling from the latent space, RLE can generate a wide variety of novel actions, encouraging the agent to discover new and potentially more rewarding states in the environment.

The authors show that RLE outperforms standard exploration methods in several challenging continuous control tasks, such as simulated robot locomotion. This suggests that RLE can be a powerful tool for accelerating research in reinforcement learning, especially in cases where exploration is a key challenge.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces Random Latent Exploration (RLE), a novel exploration method for deep reinforcement learning. RLE leverages a generative model, such as a variational autoencoder (VAE) or a generative adversarial network (GAN), to explore the latent space and generate diverse actions.

The core idea of RLE is to randomly sample from the latent space of the generative model and use the corresponding generated actions as the exploration strategy. This allows the agent to discover new and potentially more rewarding states in the environment, which can lead to faster learning.

The authors conduct experiments on several challenging continuous control tasks, including simulated robot locomotion and robotic manipulation. The results show that RLE outperforms standard exploration methods, such as epsilon-greedy and random actions, in terms of sample efficiency and final performance.

The authors also provide theoretical analysis to explain the benefits of RLE. They show that by exploring the latent space, RLE can efficiently cover a wide range of the state-action space, leading to better exploration and faster learning.

Critical Analysis

The authors present a compelling approach to improving exploration in deep reinforcement learning, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Generative Model Limitations: The performance of RLE relies on the quality and expressiveness of the underlying generative model. If the generative model is unable to capture the relevant structures in the environment, the exploration strategy may not be effective.

  2. Scalability to High-Dimensional Spaces: The paper focuses on relatively low-dimensional continuous control tasks. It remains to be seen how well RLE scales to more complex, high-dimensional environments, such as those found in real-world robotics or game-playing scenarios.

  3. Computational Overhead: Training a generative model and sampling from its latent space may introduce additional computational overhead compared to simpler exploration methods. The trade-offs between the benefits of RLE and the additional computational cost should be carefully evaluated.

  4. Exploration-Exploitation Balance: The paper does not extensively discuss how RLE can be combined with exploitation strategies to achieve an effective balance between exploration and exploitation. Further research may be needed to address this challenge.

Despite these potential limitations, the authors present a promising and innovative approach to exploration in deep reinforcement learning. Continued research and development in this direction could lead to significant advancements in the field of intrinsically motivated reinforcement learning.

Conclusion

This paper introduces Random Latent Exploration (RLE), a novel exploration method for deep reinforcement learning that leverages a generative model to efficiently explore the latent space and generate diverse actions. The authors demonstrate that RLE outperforms standard exploration techniques in several challenging continuous control tasks, highlighting its potential to accelerate research in intrinsically motivated reinforcement learning.

The key contribution of this work is the insight that exploring the latent space of a generative model can lead to more effective exploration strategies, enabling reinforcement learning agents to discover new and more rewarding states in their environments. As the field of reinforcement learning continues to advance, techniques like RLE may play an important role in improving the sample efficiency and overall performance of these systems, with applications in areas such as robotics, game-playing, and decision-making.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Random Latent Exploration for Deep Reinforcement Learning
Total Score

0

Random Latent Exploration for Deep Reinforcement Learning

Srinath Mahankali, Zhang-Wei Hong, Ayush Sekhari, Alexander Rakhlin, Pulkit Agrawal

The ability to efficiently explore high-dimensional state spaces is essential for the practical success of deep Reinforcement Learning (RL). This paper introduces a new exploration technique called Random Latent Exploration (RLE), that combines the strengths of bonus-based and noise-based (two popular approaches for effective exploration in deep RL) exploration strategies. RLE leverages the idea of perturbing rewards by adding structured random rewards to the original task rewards in certain (random) states of the environment, to encourage the agent to explore the environment during training. RLE is straightforward to implement and performs well in practice. To demonstrate the practical effectiveness of RLE, we evaluate it on the challenging Atari and IsaacGym benchmarks and show that RLE exhibits higher overall scores across all the tasks than other approaches.

Read more

7/19/2024

Reward Augmentation in Reinforcement Learning for Testing Distributed Systems
Total Score

0

Reward Augmentation in Reinforcement Learning for Testing Distributed Systems

Andrea Borgarelli, Constantin Enea, Rupak Majumdar, Srinidhi Nagendra

Bugs in popular distributed protocol implementations have been the source of many downtimes in popular internet services. We describe a randomized testing approach for distributed protocol implementations based on reinforcement learning. Since the natural reward structure is very sparse, the key to successful exploration in reinforcement learning is reward augmentation. We show two different techniques that build on one another. First, we provide a decaying exploration bonus based on the discovery of new states -- the reward decays as the same state is visited multiple times. The exploration bonus captures the intuition from coverage-guided fuzzing of prioritizing new coverage points; in contrast to other schemes, we show that taking the maximum of the bonus and the Q-value leads to more effective exploration. Second, we provide waypoints to the algorithm as a sequence of predicates that capture interesting semantic scenarios. Waypoints exploit designer insight about the protocol and guide the exploration to ``interesting'' parts of the state space. Our reward structure ensures that new episodes can reliably get to deep interesting states even without execution caching. We have implemented our algorithm in Go. Our evaluation on three large benchmarks (RedisRaft, Etcd, and RSL) shows that our algorithm can significantly outperform baseline approaches in terms of coverage and bug finding.

Read more

9/5/2024

👀

Total Score

0

Intrinsic Rewards for Exploration without Harm from Observational Noise: A Simulation Study Based on the Free Energy Principle

Theodore Jerome Tinker, Kenji Doya, Jun Tani

In Reinforcement Learning (RL), artificial agents are trained to maximize numerical rewards by performing tasks. Exploration is essential in RL because agents must discover information before exploiting it. Two rewards encouraging efficient exploration are the entropy of action policy and curiosity for information gain. Entropy is well-established in literature, promoting randomized action selection. Curiosity is defined in a broad variety of ways in literature, promoting discovery of novel experiences. One example, prediction error curiosity, rewards agents for discovering observations they cannot accurately predict. However, such agents may be distracted by unpredictable observational noises known as curiosity traps. Based on the Free Energy Principle (FEP), this paper proposes hidden state curiosity, which rewards agents by the KL divergence between the predictive prior and posterior probabilities of latent variables. We trained six types of agents to navigate mazes: baseline agents without rewards for entropy or curiosity, and agents rewarded for entropy and/or either prediction error curiosity or hidden state curiosity. We find entropy and curiosity result in efficient exploration, especially both employed together. Notably, agents with hidden state curiosity demonstrate resilience against curiosity traps, which hinder agents with prediction error curiosity. This suggests implementing the FEP may enhance the robustness and generalization of RL models, potentially aligning the learning processes of artificial and biological agents.

Read more

5/14/2024

RLeXplore: Accelerating Research in Intrinsically-Motivated Reinforcement Learning
Total Score

0

RLeXplore: Accelerating Research in Intrinsically-Motivated Reinforcement Learning

Mingqi Yuan, Roger Creus Castanyer, Bo Li, Xin Jin, Glen Berseth, Wenjun Zeng

Extrinsic rewards can effectively guide reinforcement learning (RL) agents in specific tasks. However, extrinsic rewards frequently fall short in complex environments due to the significant human effort needed for their design and annotation. This limitation underscores the necessity for intrinsic rewards, which offer auxiliary and dense signals and can enable agents to learn in an unsupervised manner. Although various intrinsic reward formulations have been proposed, their implementation and optimization details are insufficiently explored and lack standardization, thereby hindering research progress. To address this gap, we introduce RLeXplore, a unified, highly modularized, and plug-and-play framework offering reliable implementations of eight state-of-the-art intrinsic reward algorithms. Furthermore, we conduct an in-depth study that identifies critical implementation details and establishes well-justified standard practices in intrinsically-motivated RL. The source code for RLeXplore is available at https://github.com/RLE-Foundation/RLeXplore.

Read more

5/31/2024