Reward Augmentation in Reinforcement Learning for Testing Distributed Systems
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores using reinforcement learning to test distributed systems.
- It proposes a novel reward function that combines coverage-based rewards with waypoint rewards.
- The goal is to improve the effectiveness of reinforcement learning agents at exploring and testing distributed systems.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at using a type of artificial intelligence called reinforcement learning to test distributed systems. Distributed systems are complex software applications that run across multiple computers or devices, often in a coordinated way.
The key idea is to design a reward function that helps the reinforcement learning agent explore the system more effectively. A reward function is what the agent tries to maximize as it learns how to interact with the system.
The researchers propose a reward function that combines two main elements:
- Coverage-based rewards: These rewards encourage the agent to explore parts of the system it hasn't visited before, helping it find a wider range of behaviors.
- Waypoint rewards: These rewards encourage the agent to reach specific "waypoints" or milestones in the system, guiding it towards important functionality.
By using this combined reward function, the researchers aim to create reinforcement learning agents that can more thoroughly test and explore distributed systems, finding bugs and unexpected behaviors more efficiently.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a reinforcement learning approach for testing distributed systems. The key innovation is a novel reward function that combines coverage-based rewards with waypoint rewards.
The coverage-based rewards encourage the reinforcement learning agent to explore parts of the system it hasn't visited before. This helps the agent find a wider range of behaviors and potential issues. The researchers track coverage using a set of code coverage metrics.
The waypoint rewards guide the agent towards specific "waypoints" or milestones in the system's behavior. This helps the agent focus on exploring important functionality, rather than just random parts of the system.
The researchers evaluate their approach on several distributed system benchmarks, comparing it to baseline reinforcement learning methods that don't use the combined reward function. They find that the agents trained with the new reward function are able to explore the systems more effectively, finding more bugs and unexpected behaviors.
Critical Analysis
The paper introduces a promising approach for using reinforcement learning to test distributed systems. The combined reward function seems to be an effective way to balance exploration and targeted testing.
However, the paper does not discuss some potential limitations or caveats. For example, the approach may struggle with highly complex distributed systems where the state space is very large. The waypoint rewards could also be challenging to define accurately for some systems.
Additionally, the paper does not explore how the approach might scale to real-world, large-scale distributed systems. The evaluation is done on relatively simple benchmarks, and further research would be needed to understand the method's performance on more realistic, production-level distributed applications.
Overall, the research represents an interesting step forward in using reinforcement learning for distributed systems testing. But there are still open questions and areas for further study to fully understand the strengths and limitations of this approach.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel reinforcement learning method for testing distributed systems. By combining coverage-based rewards and waypoint rewards, the approach aims to create more effective reinforcement learning agents for exploring and validating the behavior of complex, distributed software applications.
The results on benchmark systems are promising, showing that the combined reward function can lead to more thorough exploration and bug discovery compared to baseline reinforcement learning methods. However, the approach still has some open questions around scalability and real-world applicability that warrant further research.
If successful, this type of reinforcement learning-based testing could become an important tool for ensuring the reliability and correctness of distributed systems, which are increasingly prevalent in modern computing and software infrastructure.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Reward Augmentation in Reinforcement Learning for Testing Distributed Systems
Andrea Borgarelli, Constantin Enea, Rupak Majumdar, Srinidhi Nagendra
Bugs in popular distributed protocol implementations have been the source of many downtimes in popular internet services. We describe a randomized testing approach for distributed protocol implementations based on reinforcement learning. Since the natural reward structure is very sparse, the key to successful exploration in reinforcement learning is reward augmentation. We show two different techniques that build on one another. First, we provide a decaying exploration bonus based on the discovery of new states -- the reward decays as the same state is visited multiple times. The exploration bonus captures the intuition from coverage-guided fuzzing of prioritizing new coverage points; in contrast to other schemes, we show that taking the maximum of the bonus and the Q-value leads to more effective exploration. Second, we provide waypoints to the algorithm as a sequence of predicates that capture interesting semantic scenarios. Waypoints exploit designer insight about the protocol and guide the exploration to ``interesting'' parts of the state space. Our reward structure ensures that new episodes can reliably get to deep interesting states even without execution caching. We have implemented our algorithm in Go. Our evaluation on three large benchmarks (RedisRaft, Etcd, and RSL) shows that our algorithm can significantly outperform baseline approaches in terms of coverage and bug finding.
Read more9/5/2024
0
Random Latent Exploration for Deep Reinforcement Learning
Srinath Mahankali, Zhang-Wei Hong, Ayush Sekhari, Alexander Rakhlin, Pulkit Agrawal
The ability to efficiently explore high-dimensional state spaces is essential for the practical success of deep Reinforcement Learning (RL). This paper introduces a new exploration technique called Random Latent Exploration (RLE), that combines the strengths of bonus-based and noise-based (two popular approaches for effective exploration in deep RL) exploration strategies. RLE leverages the idea of perturbing rewards by adding structured random rewards to the original task rewards in certain (random) states of the environment, to encourage the agent to explore the environment during training. RLE is straightforward to implement and performs well in practice. To demonstrate the practical effectiveness of RLE, we evaluate it on the challenging Atari and IsaacGym benchmarks and show that RLE exhibits higher overall scores across all the tasks than other approaches.
Read more7/19/2024
š
0
Intrinsic Rewards for Exploration without Harm from Observational Noise: A Simulation Study Based on the Free Energy Principle
Theodore Jerome Tinker, Kenji Doya, Jun Tani
In Reinforcement Learning (RL), artificial agents are trained to maximize numerical rewards by performing tasks. Exploration is essential in RL because agents must discover information before exploiting it. Two rewards encouraging efficient exploration are the entropy of action policy and curiosity for information gain. Entropy is well-established in literature, promoting randomized action selection. Curiosity is defined in a broad variety of ways in literature, promoting discovery of novel experiences. One example, prediction error curiosity, rewards agents for discovering observations they cannot accurately predict. However, such agents may be distracted by unpredictable observational noises known as curiosity traps. Based on the Free Energy Principle (FEP), this paper proposes hidden state curiosity, which rewards agents by the KL divergence between the predictive prior and posterior probabilities of latent variables. We trained six types of agents to navigate mazes: baseline agents without rewards for entropy or curiosity, and agents rewarded for entropy and/or either prediction error curiosity or hidden state curiosity. We find entropy and curiosity result in efficient exploration, especially both employed together. Notably, agents with hidden state curiosity demonstrate resilience against curiosity traps, which hinder agents with prediction error curiosity. This suggests implementing the FEP may enhance the robustness and generalization of RL models, potentially aligning the learning processes of artificial and biological agents.
Read more5/14/2024
0
Efficient Stimuli Generation using Reinforcement Learning in Design Verification
Deepak Narayan Gadde, Thomas Nalapat, Aman Kumar, Djones Lettnin, Wolfgang Kunz, Sebastian Simon
The increasing design complexity of System-on-Chips (SoCs) has led to significant verification challenges, particularly in meeting coverage targets within a timely manner. At present, coverage closure is heavily dependent on constrained random and coverage driven verification methodologies where the randomized stimuli are bounded to verify certain scenarios and to reach coverage goals. This process is said to be exhaustive and to consume a lot of project time. In this paper, a novel methodology is proposed to generate efficient stimuli with the help of Reinforcement Learning (RL) to reach the maximum code coverage of the Design Under Verification (DUV). Additionally, an automated framework is created using metamodeling to generate a SystemVerilog testbench and an RL environment for any given design. The proposed approach is applied to various designs and the produced results proves that the RL agent provides effective stimuli to achieve code coverage faster in comparison with baseline random simulations. Furthermore, various RL agents and reward schemes are analyzed in our work.
Read more6/4/2024