ReadMe++: Benchmarking Multilingual Language Models for Multi-Domain Readability Assessment

Overview

• Comprehensive evaluation of large language models for multilingual readability assessment
• Introduces ReadMe++, a new multilingual, multi-domain dataset with human-annotated sentence readability
• Benchmarks multilingual and monolingual language models in supervised, unsupervised, and few-shot prompting settings
• Explores domain generalization and cross-lingual transfer capabilities of models trained on ReadMe++

Plain English Explanation

This research paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of how well large language models, which are powerful AI systems trained on vast amounts of text, can assess the readability of sentences in multiple languages. Existing resources for evaluating readability often lack diversity in the types of content and languages covered, which limits the ability to analyze how well these models perform across different domains and languages.

To address this, the researchers introduce a new dataset called ReadMe++ that includes 9,757 sentences in Arabic, English, French, Hindi, and Russian, collected from 112 different sources. Humans have annotated these sentences with readability scores, providing a benchmark to test the performance of language models.

Using the ReadMe++ dataset, the researchers evaluate how well multilingual and single-language models perform in three different settings: supervised (where the model is trained on labeled data), unsupervised (where the model tries to assess readability without specific training), and few-shot prompting (where the model is given just a few examples to learn from). The diversity of content and languages in ReadMe++ allows the researchers to explore how well these models can generalize to new domains and transfer knowledge across languages.

The results reveal some exciting capabilities, like models trained on ReadMe++ showing superior performance in assessing readability across different domains and languages. However, the researchers also identify limitations in the state-of-the-art unsupervised methods for readability assessment. Overall, this work provides a valuable new benchmark and insights to support the development of more robust multilingual readability assessment systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of large language models for multilingual readability assessment, using a new dataset called ReadMe++ that the researchers introduce. Existing evaluation resources, such as Open Multilingual System Scoring Readability for Wikipedia, MedReadMe: A Systematic Study of Fine-Grained Sentence Readability, Tagengo: A Multilingual Chat Dataset, and MELA: A Multilingual Evaluation of Linguistic Acceptability, often lack domain and language diversity, limiting the ability for cross-domain and cross-lingual analyses.

ReadMe++ includes 9,757 sentences in Arabic, English, French, Hindi, and Russian, collected from 112 different data sources, with human annotations of readability. This benchmark is designed to encourage research on developing robust multilingual readability assessment methods.

Using ReadMe++, the researchers benchmark multilingual and monolingual language models in three settings: supervised, unsupervised, and few-shot prompting. The domain and language diversity in ReadMe++ enables them to test more effective few-shot prompting and identify shortcomings in state-of-the-art unsupervised methods for readability assessment.

The experiments also reveal exciting results, including superior domain generalization and enhanced cross-lingual transfer capabilities of models trained on ReadMe++. The researchers will make the ReadMe++ dataset publicly available and release a Python package tool for multilingual sentence readability prediction using their trained models.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that while ReadMe++ provides a valuable benchmark for evaluating multilingual readability assessment, it still has some limitations. The dataset may not capture the full complexity of real-world readability challenges, as the sentences were selected and annotated by humans rather than representing a random sample of natural language. Additionally, the researchers only evaluate a subset of large language models, and there may be other approaches or architectures that could perform even better on this task.

One area for further research would be to explore the performance of large language models in more fine-grained readability analysis, such as identifying specific linguistic features that contribute to a sentence's ease of understanding. The researchers also note that their few-shot prompting experiments could be expanded to investigate the optimal number of examples and the most effective prompting strategies for this task.

Overall, this work represents a significant contribution to the field of multilingual readability assessment, providing a new benchmark dataset and insights into the capabilities and limitations of current large language models. By encouraging further research and development in this area, the researchers aim to support the creation of more robust and accessible multilingual language technologies.

Conclusion

This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of large language models for multilingual readability assessment, introducing a new dataset called ReadMe++ that addresses limitations in existing resources. The researchers benchmark models in supervised, unsupervised, and few-shot prompting settings, revealing exciting capabilities in domain generalization and cross-lingual transfer, as well as shortcomings in state-of-the-art unsupervised methods.

By making the ReadMe++ dataset publicly available and releasing a Python package for multilingual sentence readability prediction, the researchers hope to encourage further research and development in this important area. Improving the ability of language models to accurately assess readability across diverse domains and languages has the potential to enhance the accessibility and inclusivity of a wide range of digital technologies and applications.