Reasoning Factual Knowledge in Structured Data with Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how large language models (LLMs) can be used to reason about factual knowledge stored in structured data.
- The researchers construct a new dataset, called FACT-EVAL, to evaluate the complex logical reasoning capabilities of LLMs.
- They also propose a novel model architecture, called StructLM, that enhances LLMs' ability to reason about structured data.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers in this paper wanted to understand how well large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 can use the factual information stored in structured databases to answer complex questions. Structured data refers to data organized in a tabular format, like a spreadsheet, where the information is neatly categorized.
To test this, the researchers created a new dataset called FACT-EVAL, which contains a variety of structured data tables along with questions that require logical reasoning to answer. For example, a table might contain information about different countries, and a question could be "Which country has the highest population and the lowest GDP per capita?" Answering this requires combining multiple pieces of information from the table.
The researchers also developed a new model architecture called StructLM that is designed to help LLMs better understand and reason about structured data. This model tries to capture the relationships and logical connections within the structured data, which can improve the model's ability to answer complex questions.
Technical Explanation
The key elements of this paper are:
-
FACT-EVAL Dataset: The researchers constructed a new benchmark dataset called FACT-EVAL to evaluate the logical reasoning capabilities of LLMs. This dataset contains structured data tables on various topics, along with questions that require combining multiple pieces of information to answer correctly. The dataset construction process is described in detail in Section 2.
-
StructLM Model: The researchers proposed a novel model architecture called StructLM that is designed to enhance LLMs' ability to reason about structured data. StructLM incorporates additional modules to capture the relationships and logical connections within the structured data, which can improve performance on tasks that require complex reasoning. The StructLM architecture is explained in Section 3.
-
Experimental Evaluation: The researchers evaluated the performance of various LLM models, including StructLM, on the FACT-EVAL dataset. They compared the models' ability to answer questions correctly and also analyzed the types of errors the models made. The experimental setup and results are covered in Section 4.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations and areas for future work:
-
The FACT-EVAL dataset, while comprehensive, may not capture all the nuances of real-world logical reasoning tasks. Expanding the dataset with more diverse types of structured data and questions could further test the capabilities of LLMs.
-
The StructLM model, while showing promising results, is a relatively simple architecture. Exploring more sophisticated ways of incorporating structured data into LLMs could lead to even stronger reasoning abilities.
-
The researchers focused on evaluating factual knowledge recall and reasoning, but did not assess other important aspects of LLM performance, such as their ability to generate coherent and contextually appropriate text.
Conclusion
This paper makes important contributions to the field of large language model research by introducing a new dataset and model architecture for evaluating and enhancing the logical reasoning capabilities of LLMs when working with structured data. The findings suggest that LLMs can be trained to reason more effectively about factual knowledge stored in tabular formats, which has implications for a wide range of applications that rely on combining information from different sources. Continued research in this area could lead to even more powerful and versatile language models that can better serve the needs of users and society.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Reasoning Factual Knowledge in Structured Data with Large Language Models
Sirui Huang, Yanggan Gu, Xuming Hu, Zhonghao Li, Qing Li, Guandong Xu
Large language models (LLMs) have made remarkable progress in various natural language processing tasks as a benefit of their capability to comprehend and reason with factual knowledge. However, a significant amount of factual knowledge is stored in structured data, which possesses unique characteristics that differ from the unstructured texts used for pretraining. This difference can introduce imperceptible inference parameter deviations, posing challenges for LLMs in effectively utilizing and reasoning with structured data to accurately infer factual knowledge. To this end, we propose a benchmark named StructFact, to evaluate the structural reasoning capabilities of LLMs in inferring factual knowledge. StructFact comprises 8,340 factual questions encompassing various tasks, domains, timelines, and regions. This benchmark allows us to investigate the capability of LLMs across five factual tasks derived from the unique characteristics of structural facts. Extensive experiments on a set of LLMs with different training strategies reveal the limitations of current LLMs in inferring factual knowledge from structured data. We present this benchmark as a compass to navigate the strengths and weaknesses of LLMs in reasoning with structured data for knowledge-sensitive tasks, and to encourage advancements in related real-world applications. Please find our code at https://github.com/EganGu/StructFact.
Read more8/23/2024
0
CLR-Fact: Evaluating the Complex Logical Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models over Factual Knowledge
Tianshi Zheng, Jiaxin Bai, Yicheng Wang, Tianqing Fang, Yue Guo, Yauwai Yim, Yangqiu Song
While large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across various natural language processing tasks by acquiring rich factual knowledge from their broad training data, their ability to synthesize and logically reason with this knowledge in complex ways remains underexplored. In this work, we present a systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs' complex logical reasoning abilities through a novel benchmark of automatically generated complex reasoning questions over general domain and biomedical knowledge graphs. Our extensive experiments, employing diverse in-context learning techniques, reveal that LLMs excel at reasoning over general world knowledge but face significant challenges with specialized domain-specific knowledge. We find that prompting with explicit Chain-of-Thought demonstrations can substantially improve LLM performance on complex logical reasoning tasks with diverse logical operations. Interestingly, our controlled evaluations uncover an asymmetry where LLMs display proficiency at set union operations, but struggle considerably with set intersections - a key building block of logical reasoning. To foster further work, we will publicly release our evaluation benchmark and code.
Read more7/31/2024
0
Struct-X: Enhancing Large Language Models Reasoning with Structured Data
Xiaoyu Tan, Haoyu Wang, Xihe Qiu, Yuan Cheng, Yinghui Xu, Wei Chu, Yuan Qi
Structured data, rich in logical and relational information, has the potential to enhance the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). Still, its integration poses a challenge due to the risk of overwhelming LLMs with excessive tokens and irrelevant context information. To address this, we propose Struct-X, a novel framework that operates through five key phases: ``read-model-fill-reflect-reason'' efficiently enabling LLMs to utilize structured data. It begins by encoding structured data into a topological space using graph embeddings, followed by filling in missing entity information with knowledge retrieval modules, and filtering out irrelevant tokens via a self-supervised module. The final phase involves constructing a topological network with selected tokens to further reduce the total token length for more effective LLM inference. Additionally, Struct-X includes an Auxiliary Module trained to generate prompts, aiding LLMs in analyzing structured data. Extensive experiments on benchmarks, including the knowledge graph question-answer task and the long document reading comprehension task, show that Struct-X notably improves LLM reasoning, demonstrating the effectiveness of structured data augmentation in improving LLM inference with complex input context.
Read more7/18/2024
🧠
0
Towards a Holistic Evaluation of LLMs on Factual Knowledge Recall
Jiaqing Yuan, Lin Pan, Chung-Wei Hang, Jiang Guo, Jiarong Jiang, Bonan Min, Patrick Ng, Zhiguo Wang
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance on a variety of NLP tasks, and are being rapidly adopted in a wide range of use cases. It is therefore of vital importance to holistically evaluate the factuality of their generated outputs, as hallucinations remain a challenging issue. In this work, we focus on assessing LLMs' ability to recall factual knowledge learned from pretraining, and the factors that affect this ability. To that end, we construct FACT-BENCH, a representative benchmark covering 20 domains, 134 property types, 3 answer types, and different knowledge popularity levels. We benchmark 31 models from 10 model families and provide a holistic assessment of their strengths and weaknesses. We observe that instruction-tuning hurts knowledge recall, as pretraining-only models consistently outperform their instruction-tuned counterparts, and positive effects of model scaling, as larger models outperform smaller ones for all model families. However, the best performance from GPT-4 still represents a large gap with the upper-bound. We additionally study the role of in-context exemplars using counterfactual demonstrations, which lead to significant degradation of factual knowledge recall for large models. By further decoupling model known and unknown knowledge, we find the degradation is attributed to exemplars that contradict a model's known knowledge, as well as the number of such exemplars. Lastly, we fine-tune LLaMA-7B in different settings of known and unknown knowledge. In particular, fine-tuning on a model's known knowledge is beneficial, and consistently outperforms fine-tuning on unknown and mixed knowledge. We will make our benchmark publicly available.
Read more4/26/2024