Recent Advances in OOD Detection: Problems and Approaches
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses recent advancements in out-of-distribution (OOD) detection, which is the task of identifying inputs that are different from the training data.
- OOD detection is important for building trustworthy machine learning systems that can reliably detect and handle unexpected or anomalous inputs.
- The paper covers the key problems in OOD detection and the various approaches that have been proposed to address them.
Plain English Explanation
Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is the process of identifying when a machine learning model encounters an input that is very different from the data it was trained on. This is an important capability because it allows the model to recognize when it is being asked to make predictions on something it hasn't seen before, and to avoid making unreliable or potentially harmful guesses in those cases.
For example, imagine an image recognition model that was trained to identify different types of dogs. If you show it a picture of a car, it should be able to recognize that this is not a dog and avoid trying to classify it as one. OOD detection allows the model to make this determination and either refuse to make a prediction or flag the input as being outside its normal operating range.
The key challenges in OOD detection include developing effective methods to measure the distance or difference between an input and the training data, designing models that can accurately identify OOD samples without excessive false positives, and generalizing OOD detection capabilities beyond just image recognition to other domains like medical imaging.
Addressing these challenges is important for building machine learning systems that are more robust, reliable, and trustworthy, especially as they are deployed in high-stakes applications like self-driving cars, medical diagnosis, and financial decision-making. Going beyond just vision tasks to other domains like language is also a key area of focus.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing an overview of the OOD detection problem and its importance for building trustworthy machine learning systems. It then reviews the key related work in this area, covering approaches such as:
- Density-based methods: These techniques try to estimate the probability density of the training data and use this to identify OOD samples that have low likelihood under the learned distribution.
- Reconstruction-based methods: These models train an autoencoder to reconstruct the training data, and then use the reconstruction error to detect OOD samples that cannot be well reconstructed.
- Classifier-based methods: These approaches train a binary classifier to distinguish between in-distribution and OOD samples, leveraging the decision boundary learned by the classifier.
The paper then discusses several recent advancements in OOD detection:
- Contrastive learning: Some methods use contrastive learning to learn representations that better separate in-distribution and OOD samples in the feature space.
- Adversarial training: Other approaches employ adversarial training techniques to improve the model's robustness to OOD inputs.
- Task-agnostic OOD detection: There has also been work on developing OOD detection methods that can generalize beyond a specific task or domain.
The paper also covers the evaluation of OOD detection methods, including commonly used metrics like the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the key problems and approaches in OOD detection, but it does not delve deeply into the limitations or potential issues with the existing methods.
One area that could be explored further is the trade-off between false positive and false negative rates in OOD detection. Many of the proposed techniques aim to minimize the overall error rate, but in high-stakes applications, it may be more important to avoid false negatives (i.e., failing to detect an OOD sample) than false positives. The paper could have discussed how different use cases may require different optimization strategies for OOD detection.
Additionally, the paper does not address the potential for OOD detection methods to be biased or to have blind spots, where they may fail to detect certain types of OOD inputs. This is an important consideration, especially as these techniques are applied to domains like medical imaging or autonomous systems where the consequences of errors can be severe.
Finally, the paper could have delved deeper into the computational and memory requirements of the various OOD detection approaches, as this can be a key practical consideration for deploying these methods in real-world applications.
Conclusion
Overall, the paper provides a valuable summary of the current state of research in OOD detection, highlighting the key problems and the various techniques that have been proposed to address them. As machine learning models are increasingly deployed in high-stakes applications, the ability to reliably detect and handle OOD inputs will be critical for building trustworthy and robust systems. The advancements discussed in this paper represent important steps towards that goal, but there remains significant work to be done in terms of improving the performance, robustness, and generalizability of OOD detection methods.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Recent Advances in OOD Detection: Problems and Approaches
Shuo Lu, Yingsheng Wang, Lijun Sheng, Aihua Zheng, Lingxiao He, Jian Liang
Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection aims to detect test samples outside the training category space, which is an essential component in building reliable machine learning systems. Existing reviews on OOD detection primarily focus on method taxonomy, surveying the field by categorizing various approaches. However, many recent works concentrate on non-traditional OOD detection scenarios, such as test-time adaptation, multi-modal data sources and other novel contexts. In this survey, we uniquely review recent advances in OOD detection from the problem scenario perspective for the first time. According to whether the training process is completely controlled, we divide OOD detection methods into training-driven and training-agnostic. Besides, considering the rapid development of pre-trained models, large pre-trained model-based OOD detection is also regarded as an important category and discussed separately. Furthermore, we provide a discussion of the evaluation scenarios, a variety of applications, and several future research directions. We believe this survey with new taxonomy will benefit the proposal of new methods and the expansion of more practical scenarios. A curated list of related papers is provided in the Github repository: https://github.com/shuolucs/Awesome-Out-Of-Distribution-Detection
Read more9/24/2024
0
Continual Unsupervised Out-of-Distribution Detection
Lars Doorenbos, Raphael Sznitman, Pablo M'arquez-Neila
Deep learning models excel when the data distribution during training aligns with testing data. Yet, their performance diminishes when faced with out-of-distribution (OOD) samples, leading to great interest in the field of OOD detection. Current approaches typically assume that OOD samples originate from an unconcentrated distribution complementary to the training distribution. While this assumption is appropriate in the traditional unsupervised OOD (U-OOD) setting, it proves inadequate when considering the place of deployment of the underlying deep learning model. To better reflect this real-world scenario, we introduce the novel setting of continual U-OOD detection. To tackle this new setting, we propose a method that starts from a U-OOD detector, which is agnostic to the OOD distribution, and slowly updates during deployment to account for the actual OOD distribution. Our method uses a new U-OOD scoring function that combines the Mahalanobis distance with a nearest-neighbor approach. Furthermore, we design a confidence-scaled few-shot OOD detector that outperforms previous methods. We show our method greatly improves upon strong baselines from related fields.
Read more6/5/2024
0
On the Learnability of Out-of-distribution Detection
Zhen Fang, Yixuan Li, Feng Liu, Bo Han, Jie Lu
Supervised learning aims to train a classifier under the assumption that training and test data are from the same distribution. To ease the above assumption, researchers have studied a more realistic setting: out-of-distribution (OOD) detection, where test data may come from classes that are unknown during training (i.e., OOD data). Due to the unavailability and diversity of OOD data, good generalization ability is crucial for effective OOD detection algorithms, and corresponding learning theory is still an open problem. To study the generalization of OOD detection, this paper investigates the probably approximately correct (PAC) learning theory of OOD detection that fits the commonly used evaluation metrics in the literature. First, we find a necessary condition for the learnability of OOD detection. Then, using this condition, we prove several impossibility theorems for the learnability of OOD detection under some scenarios. Although the impossibility theorems are frustrating, we find that some conditions of these impossibility theorems may not hold in some practical scenarios. Based on this observation, we next give several necessary and sufficient conditions to characterize the learnability of OOD detection in some practical scenarios. Lastly, we offer theoretical support for representative OOD detection works based on our OOD theory.
Read more4/9/2024
0
Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection and Beyond in Vision Language Model Era: A Survey
Atsuyuki Miyai, Jingkang Yang, Jingyang Zhang, Yifei Ming, Yueqian Lin, Qing Yu, Go Irie, Shafiq Joty, Yixuan Li, Hai Li, Ziwei Liu, Toshihiko Yamasaki, Kiyoharu Aizawa
Detecting out-of-distribution (OOD) samples is crucial for ensuring the safety of machine learning systems and has shaped the field of OOD detection. Meanwhile, several other problems are closely related to OOD detection, including anomaly detection (AD), novelty detection (ND), open set recognition (OSR), and outlier detection (OD). To unify these problems, a generalized OOD detection framework was proposed, taxonomically categorizing these five problems. However, Vision Language Models (VLMs) such as CLIP have significantly changed the paradigm and blurred the boundaries between these fields, again confusing researchers. In this survey, we first present a generalized OOD detection v2, encapsulating the evolution of AD, ND, OSR, OOD detection, and OD in the VLM era. Our framework reveals that, with some field inactivity and integration, the demanding challenges have become OOD detection and AD. In addition, we also highlight the significant shift in the definition, problem settings, and benchmarks; we thus feature a comprehensive review of the methodology for OOD detection, including the discussion over other related tasks to clarify their relationship to OOD detection. Finally, we explore the advancements in the emerging Large Vision Language Model (LVLM) era, such as GPT-4V. We conclude this survey with open challenges and future directions.
Read more8/1/2024