Reducing Events to Augment Log-based Anomaly Detection Models: An Empirical Study

Read original: arXiv:2409.04834 - Published 9/17/2024 by Lingzhe Zhang, Tong Jia, Kangjin Wang, Mengxi Jia, Yang Yong, Ying Li
Total Score

0

Reducing Events to Augment Log-based Anomaly Detection Models: An Empirical Study

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper investigates how reducing the number of events in log data can improve the performance of anomaly detection models.
  • The researchers conducted an empirical study to evaluate the impact of event reduction on various anomaly detection techniques.
  • They explored different event reduction strategies and assessed their effects on model accuracy, efficiency, and robustness.

Plain English Explanation

When dealing with large volumes of log data, anomaly detection can be a valuable tool for identifying unusual or problematic events. However, the sheer amount of data can make the process computationally expensive and challenging.

The researchers in this study explored whether reducing the number of events in the log data could actually improve the performance of anomaly detection models. They tested different strategies for condensing the log data, such as grouping similar events or removing less informative ones.

By applying these event reduction techniques, the researchers found that the anomaly detection models were able to achieve better accuracy, run more efficiently, and become more robust to changes in the data. This suggests that carefully curating the log data can be a valuable step in enhancing the effectiveness of anomaly detection systems.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted an empirical study to investigate the impact of log event reduction on the performance of anomaly detection models. They explored several event reduction strategies, including:

  1. Grouping similar events: Combining events with similar characteristics into higher-level "meta-events" to reduce the overall number of unique events.
  2. Removing less informative events: Identifying and excluding events that contribute little to the anomaly detection process, such as those with low frequency or low variance.

The researchers then evaluated the effects of these event reduction techniques on the accuracy, efficiency, and robustness of various anomaly detection models, including classic statistical approaches and more advanced deep learning methods.

Their results showed that the event reduction strategies could significantly improve the performance of the anomaly detection models across multiple datasets and evaluation metrics. By reducing the dimensionality of the log data, the models were able to better identify anomalous patterns and operate more efficiently, without sacrificing their ability to detect genuine anomalies.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledged several limitations and areas for further investigation in their study:

  • The effectiveness of the event reduction strategies may be highly dependent on the specific characteristics of the log data and the underlying anomaly detection task. Further research is needed to understand the broader applicability of these techniques.
  • The study focused on evaluating the impact of event reduction on model performance, but did not explore the potential trade-offs in terms of the human interpretability or explainability of the anomaly detection process.
  • The event reduction strategies were applied as a preprocessing step, but it may be beneficial to explore more integrated approaches that incorporate event reduction directly into the anomaly detection model architecture.

Additionally, one could question whether the event reduction techniques might inadvertently remove important contextual information that could be valuable for understanding the root causes of detected anomalies. Careful consideration should be given to the potential loss of such contextual details when applying these event reduction strategies.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the potential benefits of reducing the number of events in log data to enhance the performance of anomaly detection models. By leveraging event grouping and removal strategies, the researchers were able to improve the accuracy, efficiency, and robustness of various anomaly detection techniques.

These findings suggest that optimizing the log data representation can be a valuable step in developing effective anomaly detection systems, particularly when dealing with large-scale log data. Further research is needed to explore the broader applicability of these event reduction strategies and to understand their impact on the interpretability and explainability of the anomaly detection process.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Reducing Events to Augment Log-based Anomaly Detection Models: An Empirical Study
Total Score

0

Reducing Events to Augment Log-based Anomaly Detection Models: An Empirical Study

Lingzhe Zhang, Tong Jia, Kangjin Wang, Mengxi Jia, Yang Yong, Ying Li

As software systems grow increasingly intricate, the precise detection of anomalies have become both essential and challenging. Current log-based anomaly detection methods depend heavily on vast amounts of log data leading to inefficient inference and potential misguidance by noise logs. However, the quantitative effects of log reduction on the effectiveness of anomaly detection remain unexplored. Therefore, we first conduct a comprehensive study on six distinct models spanning three datasets. Through the study, the impact of log quantity and their effectiveness in representing anomalies is qualifies, uncovering three distinctive log event types that differently influence model performance. Drawing from these insights, we propose LogCleaner: an efficient methodology for the automatic reduction of log events in the context of anomaly detection. Serving as middleware between software systems and models, LogCleaner continuously updates and filters anti-events and duplicative-events in the raw generated logs. Experimental outcomes highlight LogCleaner's capability to reduce over 70% of log events in anomaly detection, accelerating the model's inference speed by approximately 300%, and universally improving the performance of models for anomaly detection.

Read more

9/17/2024

Total Score

0

On the Effectiveness of Log Representation for Log-based Anomaly Detection

Xingfang Wu, Heng Li, Foutse Khomh

Logs are an essential source of information for people to understand the running status of a software system. Due to the evolving modern software architecture and maintenance methods, more research efforts have been devoted to automated log analysis. In particular, machine learning (ML) has been widely used in log analysis tasks. In ML-based log analysis tasks, converting textual log data into numerical feature vectors is a critical and indispensable step. However, the impact of using different log representation techniques on the performance of the downstream models is not clear, which limits researchers and practitioners' opportunities of choosing the optimal log representation techniques in their automated log analysis workflows. Therefore, this work investigates and compares the commonly adopted log representation techniques from previous log analysis research. Particularly, we select six log representation techniques and evaluate them with seven ML models and four public log datasets (i.e., HDFS, BGL, Spirit and Thunderbird) in the context of log-based anomaly detection. We also examine the impacts of the log parsing process and the different feature aggregation approaches when they are employed with log representation techniques. From the experiments, we provide some heuristic guidelines for future researchers and developers to follow when designing an automated log analysis workflow. We believe our comprehensive comparison of log representation techniques can help researchers and practitioners better understand the characteristics of different log representation techniques and provide them with guidance for selecting the most suitable ones for their ML-based log analysis workflow.

Read more

4/9/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Deep Learning-based Anomaly Detection and Log Analysis for Computer Networks

Shuzhan Wang, Ruxue Jiang, Zhaoqi Wang, Yan Zhou

Computer network anomaly detection and log analysis, as an important topic in the field of network security, has been a key task to ensure network security and system reliability. First, existing network anomaly detection and log analysis methods are often challenged by high-dimensional data and complex network topologies, resulting in unstable performance and high false-positive rates. In addition, traditional methods are usually difficult to handle time-series data, which is crucial for anomaly detection and log analysis. Therefore, we need a more efficient and accurate method to cope with these problems. To compensate for the shortcomings of current methods, we propose an innovative fusion model that integrates Isolation Forest, GAN (Generative Adversarial Network), and Transformer with each other, and each of them plays a unique role. Isolation Forest is used to quickly identify anomalous data points, and GAN is used to generate synthetic data with the real data distribution characteristics to augment the training dataset, while the Transformer is used for modeling and context extraction on time series data. The synergy of these three components makes our model more accurate and robust in anomaly detection and log analysis tasks. We validate the effectiveness of this fusion model in an extensive experimental evaluation. Experimental results show that our model significantly improves the accuracy of anomaly detection while reducing the false alarm rate, which helps to detect potential network problems in advance. The model also performs well in the log analysis task and is able to quickly identify anomalous behaviors, which helps to improve the stability of the system. The significance of this study is that it introduces advanced deep learning techniques, which work anomaly detection and log analysis.

Read more

9/17/2024

Total Score

0

A Comprehensive Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Log-Based Anomaly Detection

Shan Ali, Chaima Boufaied, Domenico Bianculli, Paula Branco, Lionel Briand

Growth in system complexity increases the need for automated techniques dedicated to different log analysis tasks such as Log-based Anomaly Detection (LAD). The latter has been widely addressed in the literature, mostly by means of a variety of deep learning techniques. Despite their many advantages, that focus on deep learning techniques is somewhat arbitrary as traditional Machine Learning (ML) techniques may perform well in many cases, depending on the context and datasets. In the same vein, semi-supervised techniques deserve the same attention as supervised techniques since the former have clear practical advantages. Further, current evaluations mostly rely on the assessment of detection accuracy. However, this is not enough to decide whether or not a specific ML technique is suitable to address the LAD problem in a given context. Other aspects to consider include training and prediction times as well as the sensitivity to hyperparameter tuning, which in practice matters to engineers. In this paper, we present a comprehensive empirical study, in which we evaluate supervised and semi-supervised, traditional and deep ML techniques w.r.t. four evaluation criteria: detection accuracy, time performance, sensitivity of detection accuracy and time performance to hyperparameter tuning. The experimental results show that supervised traditional and deep ML techniques fare similarly in terms of their detection accuracy and prediction time. Moreover, overall, sensitivity analysis to hyperparameter tuning w.r.t. detection accuracy shows that supervised traditional ML techniques are less sensitive than deep learning techniques. Further, semi-supervised techniques yield significantly worse detection accuracy than supervised techniques.

Read more

5/21/2024