On the Effectiveness of Log Representation for Log-based Anomaly Detection

Read original: arXiv:2308.08736 - Published 4/9/2024 by Xingfang Wu, Heng Li, Foutse Khomh

❗

Overview

Logs provide critical information about the running status of software systems
Modern software architectures and maintenance methods have led to increased research on automated log analysis
Machine learning (ML) is widely used in log analysis tasks
Converting textual log data into numerical feature vectors is a crucial step in ML-based log analysis
The impact of different log representation techniques on downstream model performance is not well understood

Plain English Explanation

Logs are like the diary of a software system - they record important information about how the system is running. As software systems have become more complex, there's been a growing need for automated ways to analyze these logs. Machine learning has become a popular approach for this, but a key challenge is figuring out how to convert the textual log data into a format that machine learning models can work with.

There are different techniques for representing log data numerically, but it's not clear which ones work best. This study investigates and compares some common log representation methods to see how they impact the performance of machine learning models used for log-based anomaly detection. The researchers also look at how the log parsing process and feature aggregation approaches affect the results.

By providing a comprehensive comparison of log representation techniques, the goal is to give researchers and developers a better understanding of the tradeoffs involved. This can help them choose the most suitable approach when building automated log analysis workflows using machine learning.

Technical Explanation

The researchers selected six commonly used log representation techniques and evaluated them using seven different machine learning models across four public log datasets (HDFS, BGL, Spirit, and Thunderbird). The goal was to understand how the choice of log representation impacts the performance of ML-based log anomaly detection.

The six log representation techniques studied were:

Bag-of-words (BOW)
Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF)
Word2Vec
Doc2Vec
FastLog
BERT-based

The researchers also examined the effects of the log parsing process and different feature aggregation approaches when used with these log representation techniques.

Through their experiments, the researchers provide guidelines and insights to help future developers and researchers select the most suitable log representation technique for their ML-based log analysis workflows. They found that the choice of log representation can significantly impact model performance, and that the parsing process and feature aggregation methods also play an important role.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and rigorous evaluation of common log representation techniques, which is a valuable contribution to the field of automated log analysis. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

The study only considers log-based anomaly detection as the downstream task. It would be interesting to see how the log representation techniques perform on other log analysis tasks, such as log classification or log summarization.
The evaluation is limited to four public log datasets. Expanding the analysis to a wider range of log data, including proprietary datasets from industry, could provide further insights.
While the paper discusses the impacts of log parsing and feature aggregation, it does not delve deeply into optimizing these components. Exploring advanced techniques in these areas could lead to additional performance improvements.

Overall, this study represents an important step forward in understanding the role of log representation in ML-based log analysis. The insights and guidelines provided can help researchers and practitioners make more informed choices when designing their automated log analysis workflows.

Conclusion

This paper provides a comprehensive comparison of common log representation techniques and their impact on the performance of machine learning models for log-based anomaly detection. The researchers evaluated six log representation methods across four public log datasets and seven ML models, also considering the effects of log parsing and feature aggregation.

The key takeaway is that the choice of log representation can significantly influence the performance of downstream ML models. The study offers guidelines to help researchers and developers select the most suitable log representation technique for their specific needs when building automated log analysis workflows using machine learning. This work contributes to a better understanding of the tradeoffs involved in log representation and can inform future advancements in this important area of software system monitoring and maintenance.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

❗

On the Effectiveness of Log Representation for Log-based Anomaly Detection

Xingfang Wu, Heng Li, Foutse Khomh

Logs are an essential source of information for people to understand the running status of a software system. Due to the evolving modern software architecture and maintenance methods, more research efforts have been devoted to automated log analysis. In particular, machine learning (ML) has been widely used in log analysis tasks. In ML-based log analysis tasks, converting textual log data into numerical feature vectors is a critical and indispensable step. However, the impact of using different log representation techniques on the performance of the downstream models is not clear, which limits researchers and practitioners' opportunities of choosing the optimal log representation techniques in their automated log analysis workflows. Therefore, this work investigates and compares the commonly adopted log representation techniques from previous log analysis research. Particularly, we select six log representation techniques and evaluate them with seven ML models and four public log datasets (i.e., HDFS, BGL, Spirit and Thunderbird) in the context of log-based anomaly detection. We also examine the impacts of the log parsing process and the different feature aggregation approaches when they are employed with log representation techniques. From the experiments, we provide some heuristic guidelines for future researchers and developers to follow when designing an automated log analysis workflow. We believe our comprehensive comparison of log representation techniques can help researchers and practitioners better understand the characteristics of different log representation techniques and provide them with guidance for selecting the most suitable ones for their ML-based log analysis workflow.

4/9/2024

❗

A Comprehensive Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Log-Based Anomaly Detection

Shan Ali, Chaima Boufaied, Domenico Bianculli, Paula Branco, Lionel Briand

Growth in system complexity increases the need for automated techniques dedicated to different log analysis tasks such as Log-based Anomaly Detection (LAD). The latter has been widely addressed in the literature, mostly by means of a variety of deep learning techniques. Despite their many advantages, that focus on deep learning techniques is somewhat arbitrary as traditional Machine Learning (ML) techniques may perform well in many cases, depending on the context and datasets. In the same vein, semi-supervised techniques deserve the same attention as supervised techniques since the former have clear practical advantages. Further, current evaluations mostly rely on the assessment of detection accuracy. However, this is not enough to decide whether or not a specific ML technique is suitable to address the LAD problem in a given context. Other aspects to consider include training and prediction times as well as the sensitivity to hyperparameter tuning, which in practice matters to engineers. In this paper, we present a comprehensive empirical study, in which we evaluate supervised and semi-supervised, traditional and deep ML techniques w.r.t. four evaluation criteria: detection accuracy, time performance, sensitivity of detection accuracy and time performance to hyperparameter tuning. The experimental results show that supervised traditional and deep ML techniques fare similarly in terms of their detection accuracy and prediction time. Moreover, overall, sensitivity analysis to hyperparameter tuning w.r.t. detection accuracy shows that supervised traditional ML techniques are less sensitive than deep learning techniques. Further, semi-supervised techniques yield significantly worse detection accuracy than supervised techniques.

5/21/2024

Reducing Events to Augment Log-based Anomaly Detection Models: An Empirical Study

Lingzhe Zhang, Tong Jia, Kangjin Wang, Mengxi Jia, Yang Yong, Ying Li

As software systems grow increasingly intricate, the precise detection of anomalies have become both essential and challenging. Current log-based anomaly detection methods depend heavily on vast amounts of log data leading to inefficient inference and potential misguidance by noise logs. However, the quantitative effects of log reduction on the effectiveness of anomaly detection remain unexplored. Therefore, we first conduct a comprehensive study on six distinct models spanning three datasets. Through the study, the impact of log quantity and their effectiveness in representing anomalies is qualifies, uncovering three distinctive log event types that differently influence model performance. Drawing from these insights, we propose LogCleaner: an efficient methodology for the automatic reduction of log events in the context of anomaly detection. Serving as middleware between software systems and models, LogCleaner continuously updates and filters anti-events and duplicative-events in the raw generated logs. Experimental outcomes highlight LogCleaner's capability to reduce over 70% of log events in anomaly detection, accelerating the model's inference speed by approximately 300%, and universally improving the performance of models for anomaly detection.

9/17/2024

LLMParser: An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Log Parsing

Zeyang Ma, An Ran Chen, Dong Jae Kim, Tse-Hsun Chen, Shaowei Wang

Logs are important in modern software development with runtime information. Log parsing is the first step in many log-based analyses, that involve extracting structured information from unstructured log data. Traditional log parsers face challenges in accurately parsing logs due to the diversity of log formats, which directly impacts the performance of downstream log-analysis tasks. In this paper, we explore the potential of using Large Language Models (LLMs) for log parsing and propose LLMParser, an LLM-based log parser based on generative LLMs and few-shot tuning. We leverage four LLMs, Flan-T5-small, Flan-T5-base, LLaMA-7B, and ChatGLM-6B in LLMParsers. Our evaluation of 16 open-source systems shows that LLMParser achieves statistically significantly higher parsing accuracy than state-of-the-art parsers (a 96% average parsing accuracy). We further conduct a comprehensive empirical analysis on the effect of training size, model size, and pre-training LLM on log parsing accuracy. We find that smaller LLMs may be more effective than more complex LLMs; for instance where Flan-T5-base achieves comparable results as LLaMA-7B with a shorter inference time. We also find that using LLMs pre-trained using logs from other systems does not always improve parsing accuracy. While using pre-trained Flan-T5-base shows an improvement in accuracy, pre-trained LLaMA results in a decrease (decrease by almost 55% in group accuracy). In short, our study provides empirical evidence for using LLMs for log parsing and highlights the limitations and future research direction of LLM-based log parsers.

4/30/2024