ReFT: Reasoning with Reinforced Fine-Tuning

Overview

• This paper proposes a new approach called Reinforced Fine-Tuning (ReFT) to enhance the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs).
• The key idea is to use reinforcement learning to fine-tune LLMs, building on an initial supervised fine-tuning stage.
• This allows the model to learn from multiple possible reasoning paths for each problem, rather than just a single annotated path.
• Experiments show that ReFT significantly outperforms the standard supervised fine-tuning approach, with better generalization to new problems.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 have shown impressive capabilities, but they still struggle with complex reasoning tasks like math problem-solving. One approach to improve their reasoning is Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) using "chain-of-thought" annotations that provide the step-by-step reasoning. However, this approach has limitations because the training data only includes a single annotated reasoning path per problem.

The authors propose a new method called Reinforced Fine-Tuning (ReFT) that can learn from multiple possible reasoning paths. First, the model is warmed up using SFT. Then, it undergoes reinforcement learning, where the model is encouraged to generate various reasoning paths for each problem. The quality of these paths is automatically evaluated based on how well they match the final correct answer.

By learning from a richer set of reasoning examples, the ReFT model is able to better generalize its problem-solving skills. The authors show that ReFT significantly outperforms SFT on math reasoning benchmarks like GSM8K, MathQA, and SVAMP. This indicates that the reinforcement learning approach helps the model develop more robust and flexible reasoning capabilities.

Technical Explanation

The key innovation of this paper is the Reinforced Fine-Tuning (ReFT) approach, which builds on the standard Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) method.

In SFT, the language model is fine-tuned on annotated "chain-of-thought" reasoning paths provided in the training data. However, this has limited generalization ability because there is usually only a single annotated path per problem.

ReFT addresses this by using reinforcement learning to fine-tune the model. First, it goes through an SFT warmup stage. Then, during the reinforcement learning phase, the model is encouraged to generate multiple reasoning paths for each problem. These paths are automatically evaluated based on how well they match the ground-truth answer, and the model is updated to generate higher-quality paths.

The authors use the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm for the reinforcement learning stage. By learning from a diverse set of reasoning examples, the ReFT model is able to develop more generalizable problem-solving skills.

Extensive experiments on math reasoning benchmarks like GSM8K, MathQA, and SVAMP show that ReFT significantly outperforms the standard SFT approach. The authors also find that ReFT's performance can be further improved by using inference-time strategies like majority voting and re-ranking.

Critical Analysis

The ReFT approach is a clever and effective way to address the limitations of standard supervised fine-tuning for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models. By leveraging reinforcement learning, the model is able to learn from a richer set of reasoning examples, leading to better generalization.

One potential limitation of the approach is that it still relies on the availability of annotated training data, even if the annotations are used more efficiently. An interesting extension could be to explore ways to learn effective reasoning strategies without requiring any human-provided annotations, perhaps through unsupervised or self-supervised methods.

Additionally, the authors only evaluate ReFT on math reasoning tasks, so it would be valuable to see how well the approach generalizes to other types of reasoning problems, such as those involving language understanding, logical inference, or commonsense reasoning.

Overall, the ReFT method represents a promising step forward in improving the reasoning abilities of large language models, and the authors' experiments demonstrate its effectiveness. Readers are encouraged to think critically about the approach and consider how it could be further refined and applied to other domains.

Conclusion

This paper introduces Reinforced Fine-Tuning (ReFT), a novel approach for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models. By incorporating reinforcement learning into the fine-tuning process, ReFT allows the model to learn from a diverse set of reasoning paths, leading to better generalization on math reasoning tasks compared to standard supervised fine-tuning.

The key insight is that while supervised fine-tuning with annotated reasoning steps is helpful, it is limited by the fact that training data typically only includes a single annotated path per problem. ReFT addresses this by automatically generating and evaluating multiple reasoning paths during the fine-tuning stage, enabling the model to develop more robust problem-solving skills.

The authors' experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of ReFT, with significant performance gains over supervised fine-tuning on benchmark datasets. This work represents an important step forward in improving the reasoning abilities of large language models, and the principles behind ReFT could potentially be applied to enhance other types of cognitive capabilities as well.