How Abilities in Large Language Models are Affected by Supervised Fine-tuning Data Composition

Read original: arXiv:2310.05492 - Published 6/10/2024 by Guanting Dong, Hongyi Yuan, Keming Lu, Chengpeng Li, Mingfeng Xue, Dayiheng Liu, Wei Wang, Zheng Yuan, Chang Zhou, Jingren Zhou
Total Score

0

How Abilities in Large Language Models are Affected by Supervised Fine-tuning Data Composition

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores how the composition of supervised fine-tuning data affects the abilities of large language models (LLMs).
  • The researchers investigate how the choice of fine-tuning data can enhance or diminish the performance of LLMs on various tasks.
  • They provide insights into the relationship between fine-tuning data and the resulting capabilities of LLMs.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. These models are often "fine-tuned" on specific datasets to enhance their abilities for particular tasks, like question answering or text summarization.

This paper examines how the composition of the datasets used for fine-tuning can impact the final capabilities of the LLM. The researchers found that the choice of fine-tuning data is critical - it can either improve or diminish the model's performance on different types of tasks.

For example, fine-tuning an LLM on a dataset focused on scientific content might boost its ability to understand and generate technical writing, but could potentially weaken its skills in creative writing or casual conversation. The researchers provide insights into these tradeoffs and how to best design fine-tuning datasets to optimize an LLM's overall abilities.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the relationship between the composition of supervised fine-tuning data and the resulting capabilities of large language models (LLMs). The researchers fine-tuned the GPT-3 model on various datasets and evaluated its performance across a broad range of tasks.

They found that the choice of fine-tuning data had a significant impact on the model's abilities. Fine-tuning on datasets focused on specific domains, such as scientific writing or commonsense reasoning, enhanced the model's performance on related tasks but often diminished its capabilities in other areas.

The researchers also observed that datasets with diverse content and instructions led to more well-rounded LLM abilities, while datasets with narrow or biased content resulted in more specialized and limited capabilities.

These findings highlight the importance of carefully designing fine-tuning datasets to achieve the desired balance of abilities in large language models. The researchers provide insights into how to optimize the composition of fine-tuning data to enhance an LLM's overall performance.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable insights into the impact of fine-tuning data composition on the capabilities of large language models. However, it's important to note that the research was conducted using the GPT-3 model, and the results may not fully generalize to other LLMs or future model architectures.

Additionally, the paper focuses on the broad effects of fine-tuning data, but does not delve deeply into the specific mechanisms by which the data composition influences the model's abilities. Further research may be needed to understand the underlying cognitive processes and architectural changes that occur during fine-tuning.

The researchers also acknowledge that their evaluation of model capabilities is limited to the specific tasks and datasets used in their experiments. The impact of fine-tuning data on real-world applications or unseen tasks may require additional investigation.

Despite these limitations, the paper provides a valuable foundation for understanding the nuances of supervised fine-tuning in large language models. Its insights can inform the design of more effective and versatile LLM systems, which could have significant implications for a wide range of applications.

Conclusion

This paper sheds light on the critical role that the composition of supervised fine-tuning data plays in shaping the capabilities of large language models. The researchers demonstrate that the choice of fine-tuning data can either enhance or diminish an LLM's performance on various tasks, depending on the content and diversity of the dataset.

These findings have important implications for the development and deployment of LLMs, as they highlight the need to carefully design fine-tuning datasets to achieve the desired balance of abilities. By understanding the relationship between fine-tuning data and model capabilities, researchers and practitioners can work towards creating more versatile and capable LLM systems that can be tailored to specific applications and user needs.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

How Abilities in Large Language Models are Affected by Supervised Fine-tuning Data Composition
Total Score

0

How Abilities in Large Language Models are Affected by Supervised Fine-tuning Data Composition

Guanting Dong, Hongyi Yuan, Keming Lu, Chengpeng Li, Mingfeng Xue, Dayiheng Liu, Wei Wang, Zheng Yuan, Chang Zhou, Jingren Zhou

Large language models (LLMs) with enormous pre-training tokens and parameters emerge diverse abilities, including math reasoning, code generation, and instruction following. These abilities are further enhanced by supervised fine-tuning (SFT). While the open-source community has explored ad-hoc SFT for enhancing individual capabilities, proprietary LLMs exhibit versatility across various skills. Therefore, understanding the facilitation of multiple abilities via SFT is paramount. In this study, we specifically focuses on the interplay of data composition between mathematical reasoning, code generation, and general human-aligning abilities during SFT. We propose four intriguing research questions to explore the association between model performance and various factors including data amount, composition ratio, model size and SFT strategies. Our experiments reveal that distinct capabilities scale differently and larger models generally show superior performance with same amount of data. Mathematical reasoning and code generation consistently improve with increasing data amount, whereas general abilities plateau after roughly a thousand samples. Moreover, we observe data composition appears to enhance various abilities under limited data conditions, yet can lead to performance conflicts when data is plentiful. Our findings also suggest the amount of composition data influences performance more than the composition ratio. In analysis of SFT strategies, we find that sequentially learning multiple skills risks catastrophic forgetting. Our proposed Dual-stage Mixed Fine-tuning (DMT) strategy offers a promising solution to learn multiple abilities with different scaling patterns.

Read more

6/10/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Fine-tuning large language models for domain adaptation: Exploration of training strategies, scaling, model merging and synergistic capabilities

Wei Lu, Rachel K. Luu, Markus J. Buehler

The advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) for domain applications in fields such as materials science and engineering depends on the development of fine-tuning strategies that adapt models for specialized, technical capabilities. In this work, we explore the effects of Continued Pretraining (CPT), Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), and various preference-based optimization approaches, including Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Odds Ratio Preference Optimization (ORPO), on fine-tuned LLM performance. Our analysis shows how these strategies influence model outcomes and reveals that the merging of multiple fine-tuned models can lead to the emergence of capabilities that surpass the individual contributions of the parent models. We find that model merging leads to new functionalities that neither parent model could achieve alone, leading to improved performance in domain-specific assessments. Experiments with different model architectures are presented, including Llama 3.1 8B and Mistral 7B models, where similar behaviors are observed. Exploring whether the results hold also for much smaller models, we use a tiny LLM with 1.7 billion parameters and show that very small LLMs do not necessarily feature emergent capabilities under model merging, suggesting that model scaling may be a key component. In open-ended yet consistent chat conversations between a human and AI models, our assessment reveals detailed insights into how different model variants perform and show that the smallest model achieves a high intelligence score across key criteria including reasoning depth, creativity, clarity, and quantitative precision. Other experiments include the development of image generation prompts based on disparate biological material design concepts, to create new microstructures, architectural concepts, and urban design based on biological materials-inspired construction principles.

Read more

9/6/2024

Unveiling the Impact of Coding Data Instruction Fine-Tuning on Large Language Models Reasoning
Total Score

0

Unveiling the Impact of Coding Data Instruction Fine-Tuning on Large Language Models Reasoning

Xinlu Zhang, Zhiyu Zoey Chen, Xi Ye, Xianjun Yang, Lichang Chen, William Yang Wang, Linda Ruth Petzold

Instruction Fine-Tuning (IFT) significantly enhances the zero-shot capabilities of pretrained Large Language Models (LLMs). While coding data is known to boost reasoning abilities during LLM pretraining, its role in activating internal reasoning capacities during IFT remains understudied. This paper investigates a key question: How does coding data impact LLMs' reasoning capacities during the IFT stage? To explore this, we thoroughly examine the impact of coding data across different coding data proportions, model families, sizes, and reasoning domains, from various perspectives. Specifically, we create three IFT datasets with increasing coding data proportions, fine-tune six LLM backbones across different families and scales on these datasets, evaluate the tuned models' performance across twelve tasks in three reasoning domains, and analyze the outcomes from three broad-to-granular perspectives: overall, domain-level, and task-specific. Our holistic analysis provides valuable insights in each perspective. First, coding data tuning enhances the overall reasoning capabilities of LLMs across different model families and scales. Moreover, the effect of coding data varies among different domains but shows consistent trends across model families and scales within each domain. Additionally, coding data generally yields comparable task-specific benefits across different model families, with the optimal coding data proportions in IFT datasets being task-specific.

Read more

6/3/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Optimizing Language Model's Reasoning Abilities with Weak Supervision

Yongqi Tong, Sizhe Wang, Dawei Li, Yifan Wang, Simeng Han, Zi Lin, Chengsong Huang, Jiaxin Huang, Jingbo Shang

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated proficiency in handling complex queries, much of the past work has depended on extensively annotated datasets by human experts. However, this reliance on fully-supervised annotations poses scalability challenges, particularly as models and data requirements grow. To mitigate this, we explore the potential of enhancing LLMs' reasoning abilities with minimal human supervision. In this work, we introduce self-reinforcement, which begins with Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) of the model using a small collection of annotated questions. Then it iteratively improves LLMs by learning from the differences in responses from the SFT and unfinetuned models on unlabeled questions. Our approach provides an efficient approach without relying heavily on extensive human-annotated explanations. However, current reasoning benchmarks typically only include golden-reference answers or rationales. Therefore, we present textsc{PuzzleBen}, a weakly supervised benchmark that comprises 25,147 complex questions, answers, and human-generated rationales across various domains, such as brainteasers, puzzles, riddles, parajumbles, and critical reasoning tasks. A unique aspect of our dataset is the inclusion of 10,000 unannotated questions, enabling us to explore utilizing fewer supersized data to boost LLMs' inference capabilities. Our experiments underscore the significance of textsc{PuzzleBen}, as well as the effectiveness of our methodology as a promising direction in future endeavors. Our dataset and code will be published soon on texttt{Anonymity Link}.

Read more

5/8/2024