On the Relationship Between Monotone and Squared Probabilistic Circuits
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the relationship between two types of probabilistic circuits: monotone circuits and squared circuits.
- Monotone circuits are a class of probabilistic circuits that maintain a certain monotonicity property, while squared circuits are obtained by squaring the output of a probabilistic circuit.
- The paper investigates the connection between these two types of circuits and provides insights into their expressiveness and the computational complexity of operations on them.
Plain English Explanation
Monotone Circuits
Monotone circuits are a special type of probabilistic circuit where the output values always increase as the input values increase. This means that if you change the input values to make them larger, the output value will never decrease.
Squared Circuits
Squared circuits are created by taking a probabilistic circuit and squaring its output. This can create a new circuit with different properties and capabilities than the original.
The Relationship
This paper explores the connection between these two types of circuits. It looks at how the monotonicity of the original circuit relates to the properties of the squared circuit. It also investigates the computational complexity of working with these circuits, such as evaluating them or learning their parameters from data.
The findings provide insights into the strengths and limitations of each type of circuit, which can help researchers and practitioners choose the right tool for their machine learning and probabilistic modeling tasks.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by defining the concept of monotone probabilistic circuits, which are circuits where the output value is a monotonically increasing function of the input values. It then introduces the idea of squared probabilistic circuits, which are obtained by squaring the output of a probabilistic circuit.
The main result of the paper is a characterization of the relationship between monotone and squared probabilistic circuits. Specifically, the authors show that a circuit is monotone if and only if its squared version satisfies certain properties related to the smooth min-max function.
This connection allows the authors to derive insights about the expressiveness and computational complexity of operations on both types of circuits. For example, they show that evaluating a squared circuit is no harder than evaluating the original monotone circuit, but learning the parameters of a squared circuit is more challenging than learning the parameters of a monotone circuit.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough theoretical analysis of the relationship between monotone and squared probabilistic circuits. The results seem technically sound and the proofs are rigorous. However, the paper does not explore any empirical validation of the theoretical insights, such as comparing the performance of monotone and squared circuits on real-world datasets or applications.
Additionally, the paper focuses on the mathematical properties of these circuits, but does not discuss potential practical implications or use cases. It would be valuable to see how the insights from this work could inform the design of more effective probabilistic models or influence the choice of circuit architecture for specific machine learning problems.
Conclusion
This paper offers a detailed analysis of the connection between monotone and squared probabilistic circuits. The key finding is that a circuit is monotone if and only if its squared version satisfies certain properties related to the smooth min-max function. This result provides insights into the expressiveness and computational complexity of these circuit types, which can inform the development of more effective probabilistic models and machine learning systems.
While the theoretical analysis is rigorous, the paper lacks empirical validation and discussion of practical applications. Further research could explore the performance of these circuits on real-world tasks and investigate how the insights from this work can be leveraged to solve important problems in machine learning and probabilistic modeling.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
On the Relationship Between Monotone and Squared Probabilistic Circuits
Benjie Wang, Guy Van den Broeck
Probabilistic circuits are a unifying representation of functions as computation graphs of weighted sums and products. Their primary application is in probabilistic modeling, where circuits with non-negative weights (monotone circuits) can be used to represent and learn density/mass functions, with tractable marginal inference. Recently, it was proposed to instead represent densities as the square of the circuit function (squared circuits); this allows the use of negative weights while retaining tractability, and can be exponentially more compact than monotone circuits. Unfortunately, we show the reverse also holds, meaning that monotone circuits and squared circuits are incomparable in general. This raises the question of whether we can reconcile, and indeed improve upon the two modeling approaches. We answer in the positive by proposing InceptionPCs, a novel type of circuit that naturally encompasses both monotone circuits and squared circuits as special cases, and employs complex parameters. Empirically, we validate that InceptionPCs can outperform both monotone and squared circuits on image datasets.
Read more8/6/2024
0
Sum of Squares Circuits
Lorenzo Loconte, Stefan Mengel, Antonio Vergari
Designing expressive generative models that support exact and efficient inference is a core question in probabilistic ML. Probabilistic circuits (PCs) offer a framework where this tractability-vs-expressiveness trade-off can be analyzed theoretically. Recently, squared PCs encoding subtractive mixtures via negative parameters have emerged as tractable models that can be exponentially more expressive than monotonic PCs, i.e., PCs with positive parameters only. In this paper, we provide a more precise theoretical characterization of the expressiveness relationships among these models. First, we prove that squared PCs can be less expressive than monotonic ones. Second, we formalize a novel class of PCs -- sum of squares PCs -- that can be exponentially more expressive than both squared and monotonic PCs. Around sum of squares PCs, we build an expressiveness hierarchy that allows us to precisely unify and separate different tractable model classes such as Born Machines and PSD models, and other recently introduced tractable probabilistic models by using complex parameters. Finally, we empirically show the effectiveness of sum of squares circuits in performing distribution estimation.
Read more8/22/2024
🏅
0
Polynomial Semantics of Tractable Probabilistic Circuits
Oliver Broadrick, Honghua Zhang, Guy Van den Broeck
Probabilistic circuits compute multilinear polynomials that represent multivariate probability distributions. They are tractable models that support efficient marginal inference. However, various polynomial semantics have been considered in the literature (e.g., network polynomials, likelihood polynomials, generating functions, and Fourier transforms). The relationships between circuit representations of these polynomial encodings of distributions is largely unknown. In this paper, we prove that for distributions over binary variables, each of these probabilistic circuit models is equivalent in the sense that any circuit for one of them can be transformed into a circuit for any of the others with only a polynomial increase in size. They are therefore all tractable for marginal inference on the same class of distributions. Finally, we explore the natural extension of one such polynomial semantics, called probabilistic generating circuits, to categorical random variables, and establish that inference becomes #P-hard.
Read more4/30/2024
🤖
0
Probabilistic Generating Circuits -- Demystified
Sanyam Agarwal, Markus Blaser
Zhang et al. (ICML 2021, PLMR 139, pp. 12447-1245) introduced probabilistic generating circuits (PGCs) as a probabilistic model to unify probabilistic circuits (PCs) and determinantal point processes (DPPs). At a first glance, PGCs store a distribution in a very different way, they compute the probability generating polynomial instead of the probability mass function and it seems that this is the main reason why PGCs are more powerful than PCs or DPPs. However, PGCs also allow for negative weights, whereas classical PCs assume that all weights are nonnegative. One of the main insights of our paper is that the negative weights are responsible for the power of PGCs and not the different representation. PGCs are PCs in disguise, in particular, we show how to transform any PGC into a PC with negative weights with only polynomial blowup. PGCs were defined by Zhang et al. only for binary random variables. As our second main result, we show that there is a good reason for this: we prove that PGCs for categorial variables with larger image size do not support tractable marginalization unless NP = P. On the other hand, we show that we can model categorial variables with larger image size as PC with negative weights computing set-multilinear polynomials. These allow for tractable marginalization. In this sense, PCs with negative weights strictly subsume PGCs.
Read more4/5/2024