ReLExS: Reinforcement Learning Explanations for Stackelberg No-Regret Learners
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper examines a novel approach to learning Stackelberg equilibria, which are a type of game-theoretic solution where one player (the "leader") commits to a strategy first, and the other player(s) (the "followers") then respond optimally.
- The researchers propose a "no-regret" learning algorithm that allows the leader to converge to the Stackelberg equilibrium without full knowledge of the followers' utility functions.
- The algorithm is evaluated on a newsvendor problem, where the leader (the retailer) sets the wholesale price and the followers (the customers) decide how much to purchase.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at a type of strategic decision-making called a Stackelberg game, where one player (the "leader") makes a decision first, and the other player(s) (the "followers") then respond to that decision.
In these games, the goal is to find the Stackelberg equilibrium, which is the best strategy for the leader given the followers' optimal responses. However, the leader often doesn't know the exact details of how the followers will respond.
The researchers develop a "no-regret" learning algorithm that allows the leader to converge to the Stackelberg equilibrium without needing full information about the followers. This is demonstrated on a newsvendor problem, where a retailer (the leader) sets wholesale prices and customers (the followers) decide how much to buy.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a novel algorithm for learning Stackelberg equilibria in settings where the leader does not have full information about the followers' utility functions. The key idea is to use a "no-regret" learning approach, where the leader updates their strategy in a way that minimizes their maximum possible regret.
Specifically, the leader uses an online mirror descent algorithm to update their strategy, while the followers best-respond to the leader's strategy. The researchers prove that this algorithm converges to the Stackelberg equilibrium under mild assumptions.
They evaluate the algorithm on a newsvendor problem, where the leader (the retailer) sets the wholesale price and the followers (the customers) decide how much to purchase. The results show that the no-regret algorithm outperforms alternative approaches in terms of converging to the Stackelberg equilibrium and maximizing the leader's utility.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach for learning Stackelberg equilibria in settings with incomplete information. The no-regret algorithm is theoretically grounded and empirically validated on a relevant application.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations. For example, the analysis assumes that the followers best-respond to the leader's strategy, which may not always be realistic. Additionally, the newsvendor problem used in the evaluation is relatively simple, and it would be valuable to see how the algorithm performs on more complex, real-world Stackelberg games.
Further research could also investigate the robustness of the algorithm to noise, uncertainty, or adversarial followers, as well as explore extensions to more general game-theoretic settings beyond Stackelberg games.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel no-regret learning algorithm for computing Stackelberg equilibria in settings with incomplete information. The algorithm is theoretically grounded and empirically validated on a newsvendor problem, demonstrating its potential to improve decision-making in a variety of strategic interactions. While the paper has some limitations, it represents an important step forward in the field of Stackelberg game learning and may inspire further advancements in this area.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
ReLExS: Reinforcement Learning Explanations for Stackelberg No-Regret Learners
Xiangge Huang, Jingyuan Li, Jiaqing Xie
With the constraint of a no regret follower, will the players in a two-player Stackelberg game still reach Stackelberg equilibrium? We first show when the follower strategy is either reward-average or transform-reward-average, the two players can always get the Stackelberg Equilibrium. Then, we extend that the players can achieve the Stackelberg equilibrium in the two-player game under the no regret constraint. Also, we show a strict upper bound of the follower's utility difference between with and without no regret constraint. Moreover, in constant-sum two-player Stackelberg games with non-regret action sequences, we ensure the total optimal utility of the game remains also bounded.
Read more8/27/2024
0
No-Regret Learning for Stackelberg Equilibrium Computation in Newsvendor Pricing Games
Larkin Liu, Yuming Rong
We introduce the application of online learning in a Stackelberg game pertaining to a system with two learning agents in a dyadic exchange network, consisting of a supplier and retailer, specifically where the parameters of the demand function are unknown. In this game, the supplier is the first-moving leader, and must determine the optimal wholesale price of the product. Subsequently, the retailer who is the follower, must determine both the optimal procurement amount and selling price of the product. In the perfect information setting, this is known as the classical price-setting Newsvendor problem, and we prove the existence of a unique Stackelberg equilibrium when extending this to a two-player pricing game. In the framework of online learning, the parameters of the reward function for both the follower and leader must be learned, under the assumption that the follower will best respond with optimism under uncertainty. A novel algorithm based on contextual linear bandits with a measurable uncertainty set is used to provide a confidence bound on the parameters of the stochastic demand. Consequently, optimal finite time regret bounds on the Stackelberg regret, along with convergence guarantees to an approximate Stackelberg equilibrium, are provided.
Read more5/21/2024
➖
0
Regret Minimization in Stackelberg Games with Side Information
Keegan Harris, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Maria-Florina Balcan
Algorithms for playing in Stackelberg games have been deployed in real-world domains including airport security, anti-poaching efforts, and cyber-crime prevention. However, these algorithms often fail to take into consideration the additional information available to each player (e.g. traffic patterns, weather conditions, network congestion), a salient feature of reality which may significantly affect both players' optimal strategies. We formalize such settings as Stackelberg games with side information, in which both players observe an external context before playing. The leader commits to a (context-dependent) strategy, and the follower best-responds to both the leader's strategy and the context. We focus on the online setting in which a sequence of followers arrive over time, and the context may change from round-to-round. In sharp contrast to the non-contextual version, we show that it is impossible for the leader to achieve good performance (measured by regret) in the full adversarial setting. Motivated by our impossibility result, we show that no-regret learning is possible in two natural relaxations: the setting in which the sequence of followers is chosen stochastically and the sequence of contexts is adversarial, and the setting in which the sequence of contexts is stochastic and the sequence of followers is chosen by an adversary.
Read more5/24/2024
🗣️
0
Impact of Decentralized Learning on Player Utilities in Stackelberg Games
Kate Donahue, Nicole Immorlica, Meena Jagadeesan, Brendan Lucier, Aleksandrs Slivkins
When deployed in the world, a learning agent such as a recommender system or a chatbot often repeatedly interacts with another learning agent (such as a user) over time. In many such two-agent systems, each agent learns separately and the rewards of the two agents are not perfectly aligned. To better understand such cases, we examine the learning dynamics of the two-agent system and the implications for each agent's objective. We model these systems as Stackelberg games with decentralized learning and show that standard regret benchmarks (such as Stackelberg equilibrium payoffs) result in worst-case linear regret for at least one player. To better capture these systems, we construct a relaxed regret benchmark that is tolerant to small learning errors by agents. We show that standard learning algorithms fail to provide sublinear regret, and we develop algorithms to achieve near-optimal $O(T^{2/3})$ regret for both players with respect to these benchmarks. We further design relaxed environments under which faster learning ($O(sqrt{T})$) is possible. Altogether, our results take a step towards assessing how two-agent interactions in sequential and decentralized learning environments affect the utility of both agents.
Read more6/24/2024