Regret Minimization in Stackelberg Games with Side Information

Overview

• This paper explores the challenges of Stackelberg games, a type of strategic game, in real-world settings where players have access to additional information that can impact their optimal strategies.
• The researchers formalize these settings as Stackelberg games with side information, where both players observe an external context before making their moves.
• They focus on the online setting, where a sequence of followers interact with the leader over time, and the context may change from round to round.

Plain English Explanation

In many real-world scenarios, such as airport security, anti-poaching efforts, and cyber-crime prevention, algorithms for playing Stackelberg games have been deployed. These algorithms, however, often fail to consider the additional information available to each player, such as traffic patterns, weather conditions, or network congestion. This additional information can significantly affect the optimal strategies of both players.

To address this, the researchers in this paper have formalized these settings as Stackelberg games with side information. In these games, both the leader (who commits to a strategy) and the follower (who best responds to the leader's strategy and the context) have access to an external context before making their moves. The researchers focus on the online setting, where a sequence of followers interact with the leader over time, and the context may change from round to round.

Surprisingly, the researchers show that in the fully adversarial setting, it is impossible for the leader to achieve good performance (measured by regret) in these Stackelberg games with side information. This is in sharp contrast to the non-contextual version of these games, where good performance is achievable.

Technical Explanation

The researchers formalize Stackelberg games with side information as follows: both the leader and the follower observe an external context before the follower makes their move. The leader commits to a (context-dependent) strategy, and the follower best-responds to both the leader's strategy and the context.

In the online setting, a sequence of followers arrive over time, and the context may change from round to round. The researchers show that in this fully adversarial setting, it is impossible for the leader to achieve good performance (measured by regret). This is a significant departure from the non-contextual version of Stackelberg games, where no-regret learning is possible.

Motivated by this impossibility result, the researchers explore two natural relaxations where no-regret learning is possible for the leader:

1. The setting where the sequence of followers is chosen stochastically, and the sequence of contexts is adversarial.
2. The setting where the sequence of contexts is stochastic, and the sequence of followers is chosen by an adversary.

These results highlight the importance of considering the information available to players in Stackelberg games, and the challenges that arise when this information can change over time in an adversarial manner.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that their impossibility result for the fully adversarial setting is quite strong, and they explore more tractable relaxations where no-regret learning is possible. However, the question remains whether these relaxations capture the true nature of many real-world Stackelberg game scenarios.

Additionally, the researchers do not discuss the potential computational complexity of the algorithms they propose for the relaxed settings. In some cases, achieving no-regret learning can be computationally intractable, so further analysis of the algorithmic efficiency would be valuable.

It would also be interesting to see the researchers explore other possible relaxations or extensions of the Stackelberg game model with side information, such as cases where the leader has limited adaptivity or the leader and follower have different informational assumptions.

Conclusion

This paper highlights the challenges of Stackelberg games in real-world settings where players have access to additional information that can significantly impact their optimal strategies. The researchers show that in the fully adversarial setting, it is impossible for the leader to achieve good performance, in contrast to the non-contextual version of these games.

By exploring relaxed settings where no-regret learning is possible, the researchers provide a foundation for further research into Stackelberg games with side information. These findings have important implications for the deployment of Stackelberg game algorithms in domains like security, conservation, and cyber-crime prevention, where contextual information can play a crucial role in determining optimal strategies.