Reliable Communication in Hybrid Authentication and Trust Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines reliable communication in hybrid authentication and trust models.
- It explores how to ensure trustworthy communication in systems that use a combination of authentication methods and trust-based approaches.
- The key focus is on maintaining reliable communication in the face of potential security threats or unreliable network conditions.
Plain English Explanation
In many real-world communication systems, a combination of authentication techniques and trust-based approaches are used to verify the identity and reliability of the parties involved. This is known as a "hybrid authentication and trust model." For example, in a financial system, users may need to provide a password (authentication) and the system may also consider past transaction history and other factors to assess trustworthiness.
The challenge is ensuring that communication remains reliable and secure in these hybrid models, even when faced with potential security threats or unreliable network conditions. The paper investigates methods to maintain trustworthy communication by linking to relevant section leveraging both authentication and trust-based mechanisms.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by introducing the concept of hybrid authentication and trust models and the importance of reliable communication in such systems. It then presents a formal model for analyzing the problem, including definitions of authentication, trust, and reliable communication.
The core of the technical contribution is a set of protocols designed to enable reliable communication in hybrid authentication and trust models. These protocols combine authentication checks with trust-based evaluations to verify the identity and dependability of communicating parties. The authors analyze the properties of these protocols, including their security guarantees and communication complexity.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful approach to the challenge of reliable communication in hybrid authentication and trust models. The proposed protocols seem well-designed and the analysis of their properties is thorough.
However, the authors acknowledge certain limitations of their work, such as the need for further research on dynamic trust updates and the handling of malicious behavior by a subset of participants. Additionally, the experimental evaluation is limited, and more extensive testing would be helpful to validate the protocols' real-world performance.
Conclusion
This paper tackles an important problem in the design of secure and reliable communication systems. By combining authentication checks and trust-based assessments, the proposed protocols offer a promising approach to ensuring trustworthy interactions in hybrid models.
While further research is needed to address the identified limitations, this work makes a valuable contribution to the field of secure and reliable communication systems. The insights and techniques presented here could inform the development of more robust and trustworthy communication architectures in a variety of applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Reliable Communication in Hybrid Authentication and Trust Models
Rowdy Chotkan, Bart Cox, Vincent Rahli, J'er'emie Decouchant
Reliable communication is a fundamental distributed communication abstraction that allows any two nodes of a network to communicate with each other. It is necessary for more powerful communication primitives, such as broadcast and consensus. Using different authentication models, two classical protocols implement reliable communication in unknown and sufficiently connected networks. In the first one, network links are authenticated, and processes rely on dissemination paths to authenticate messages. In the second one, processes generate digital signatures that are flooded in the network. This work considers the hybrid system model that combines authenticated links and authenticated processes. We additionally aim to leverage the possible presence of trusted nodes and trusted components in networks, which have been assumed in the scientific literature and in practice. We first extend the two classical reliable communication protocols to leverage trusted nodes. We then propose DualRC, a novel algorithm that enables reliable communication in the hybrid authentication model by manipulating both dissemination paths and digital signatures, and leverages the possible presence of trusted nodes (e.g., network gateways) and trusted components (e.g., Intel SGX enclaves). We provide correctness verification algorithms to assess whether our algorithms implement reliable communication for all nodes on a given network.
Read more8/16/2024
🤿
0
Asymmetric Distributed Trust
Orestis Alpos, Christian Cachin, Bjorn Tackmann, Luca Zanolini
Quorum systems are a key abstraction in distributed fault-tolerant computing for capturing trust assumptions. They can be found at the core of many algorithms for implementing reliable broadcasts, shared memory, consensus and other problems. This paper introduces asymmetric Byzantine quorum systems that model subjective trust. Every process is free to choose which combinations of other processes it trusts and which ones it considers faulty. Asymmetric quorum systems strictly generalize standard Byzantine quorum systems, which have only one global trust assumption for all processes. This work also presents protocols that implement abstractions of shared memory, broadcast primitives, and a consensus protocol among processes prone to Byzantine faults and asymmetric trust. The model and protocols pave the way for realizing more elaborate algorithms with asymmetric trust.
Read more5/3/2024
0
Byzantine Reliable Broadcast with Low Communication and Time Complexity
Thomas Locher
Byzantine reliable broadcast is a fundamental problem in distributed computing, which has been studied extensively over the past decades. State-of-the-art algorithms are predominantly based on the approach to share encoded fragments of the broadcast message, yielding an asymptotically optimal communication complexity when the message size exceeds the network size, a condition frequently encountered in practice. However, algorithms following the standard coding approach incur an overhead factor of at least 3, which can already be a burden for bandwidth-constrained applications. Minimizing this overhead is an important objective with immediate benefits to protocols that use a reliable broadcast routine as a building block. This paper introduces a novel mechanism to lower the communication and computational complexity. Two algorithms are presented that employ this mechanism to reliably broadcast messages in an asynchronous network where less than a third of all nodes are Byzantine. The first algorithm reduces the overhead factor to 2 and has a time complexity of 3 if the sender is honest, whereas the second algorithm attains an optimal time complexity of 2 with the same overhead factor in the absence of equivocation. Moreover, an optimization for real-world implementations is proposed, reducing the overhead factor to 3/2 under normal operation. Lastly, a lower bound is proved that an overhead factor lower than 3/2 cannot be achieved for a relevant class of reliable broadcast algorithms.
Read more4/15/2024
0
The Role of Confidence for Trust-based Resilient Consensus (Extended Version)
Luca Ballotta. Michal Yemini
We consider a multi-agent system where agents aim to achieve a consensus despite interactions with malicious agents that communicate misleading information. Physical channels supporting communication in cyberphysical systems offer attractive opportunities to detect malicious agents, nevertheless, trustworthiness indications coming from the channel are subject to uncertainty and need to be treated with this in mind. We propose a resilient consensus protocol that incorporates trust observations from the channel and weighs them with a parameter that accounts for how confident an agent is regarding its understanding of the legitimacy of other agents in the network, with no need for the initial observation window $T_0$ that has been utilized in previous works. Analytical and numerical results show that (i) our protocol achieves a resilient consensus in the presence of malicious agents and (ii) the steady-state deviation from nominal consensus can be minimized by a suitable choice of the confidence parameter that depends on the statistics of trust observations.
Read more4/12/2024