Resilience in Online Federated Learning: Mitigating Model-Poisoning Attacks via Partial Sharing

Read original: arXiv:2403.13108 - Published 8/19/2024 by Ehsan Lari, Reza Arablouei, Vinay Chakravarthi Gogineni, Stefan Werner
Total Score

0

Resilience in Online Federated Learning: Mitigating Model-Poisoning Attacks via Partial Sharing

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Online federated learning is susceptible to model poisoning attacks by Byzantine clients
  • This paper analyzes the impact of partial model sharing on the resilience of federated learning against such attacks
  • The researchers conducted experiments on a linear regression task, comparing full model sharing and partial model sharing

Plain English Explanation

Online federated learning is a way for multiple devices or organizations to train a shared machine learning model together without sharing their full datasets. However, this system can be vulnerable to attacks where some of the participants (called "Byzantine clients") intentionally submit bad model updates to try to corrupt the final model.

This paper examines whether having the clients only share part of their model, instead of the full model, can help make the federated learning system more resilient against these model poisoning attacks. The researchers tested this idea using a simple linear regression task, comparing the performance when clients shared their full models versus when they only shared part of their models.

Technical Explanation

The paper explores the impact of partial model sharing on the resilience of online federated learning against model poisoning attacks by Byzantine clients. The researchers conducted experiments on a linear regression task, comparing the performance under full model sharing and partial model sharing.

In the full model sharing setting, each client shares their entire local model update with the server. In the partial model sharing setting, clients only share a subset of their model parameters. The server then aggregates the received updates to compute the global model update.

The key findings were that partial model sharing can improve the resilience of federated learning against model poisoning attacks, compared to the full model sharing approach. The partial sharing strategy was able to maintain good model performance even with a significant fraction of Byzantine clients, by limiting the impact of their malicious updates.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable analysis of the tradeoffs involved in mitigating model poisoning attacks in federated learning. The partial model sharing approach shows promise as a practical defense mechanism, as it can be implemented without requiring significant changes to the federated learning workflow.

However, the paper does not address several important practical considerations. For example, it is unclear how to determine the optimal subset of model parameters to share, as this may depend on the specific task and model architecture. Additionally, the linear regression setup used in the experiments may not fully capture the complexity of real-world machine learning problems.

Further research is needed to understand the robustness of partial model sharing under more diverse attack scenarios and more complex models. Exploring adaptive attacks that target the partial sharing mechanism would also be an important direction for future work.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates that partial model sharing can improve the resilience of online federated learning against model poisoning attacks by Byzantine clients. The experimental results on a linear regression task suggest that this approach can maintain good model performance even with a significant fraction of malicious participants.

While the findings are promising, more research is needed to fully understand the practical implications and limitations of this defense strategy. Continued efforts to address the security and reliability challenges of federated learning will be crucial as this technology becomes more widely adopted.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Resilience in Online Federated Learning: Mitigating Model-Poisoning Attacks via Partial Sharing
Total Score

0

Resilience in Online Federated Learning: Mitigating Model-Poisoning Attacks via Partial Sharing

Ehsan Lari, Reza Arablouei, Vinay Chakravarthi Gogineni, Stefan Werner

Federated learning (FL) allows training machine learning models on distributed data without compromising privacy. However, FL is vulnerable to model-poisoning attacks where malicious clients tamper with their local models to manipulate the global model. In this work, we investigate the resilience of the partial-sharing online FL (PSO-Fed) algorithm against such attacks. PSO-Fed reduces communication overhead by allowing clients to share only a fraction of their model updates with the server. We demonstrate that this partial sharing mechanism has the added advantage of enhancing PSO-Fed's robustness to model-poisoning attacks. Through theoretical analysis, we show that PSO-Fed maintains convergence even under Byzantine attacks, where malicious clients inject noise into their updates. Furthermore, we derive a formula for PSO-Fed's mean square error, considering factors like stepsize, attack probability, and the number of malicious clients. Interestingly, we find a non-trivial optimal stepsize that maximizes PSO-Fed's resistance to these attacks. Extensive numerical experiments confirm our theoretical findings and showcase PSO-Fed's superior performance against model-poisoning attacks compared to other leading FL algorithms.

Read more

8/19/2024

Poisoning with A Pill: Circumventing Detection in Federated Learning
Total Score

0

Poisoning with A Pill: Circumventing Detection in Federated Learning

Hanxi Guo, Hao Wang, Tao Song, Tianhang Zheng, Yang Hua, Haibing Guan, Xiangyu Zhang

Without direct access to the client's data, federated learning (FL) is well-known for its unique strength in data privacy protection among existing distributed machine learning techniques. However, its distributive and iterative nature makes FL inherently vulnerable to various poisoning attacks. To counteract these threats, extensive defenses have been proposed to filter out malicious clients, using various detection metrics. Based on our analysis of existing attacks and defenses, we find that there is a lack of attention to model redundancy. In neural networks, various model parameters contribute differently to the model's performance. However, existing attacks in FL manipulate all the model update parameters with the same strategy, making them easily detectable by common defenses. Meanwhile, the defenses also tend to analyze the overall statistical features of the entire model updates, leaving room for sophisticated attacks. Based on these observations, this paper proposes a generic and attack-agnostic augmentation approach designed to enhance the effectiveness and stealthiness of existing FL poisoning attacks against detection in FL, pointing out the inherent flaws of existing defenses and exposing the necessity of fine-grained FL security. Specifically, we employ a three-stage methodology that strategically constructs, generates, and injects poison (generated by existing attacks) into a pill (a tiny subnet with a novel structure) during the FL training, named as pill construction, pill poisoning, and pill injection accordingly. Extensive experimental results show that FL poisoning attacks enhanced by our method can bypass all the popular defenses, and can gain an up to 7x error rate increase, as well as on average a more than 2x error rate increase on both IID and non-IID data, in both cross-silo and cross-device FL systems.

Read more

7/23/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

Mitigating Malicious Attacks in Federated Learning via Confidence-aware Defense

Qilei Li, Ahmed M. Abdelmoniem

Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning diagram that enables multiple clients to collaboratively train a global model without sharing their private local data. However, FL systems are vulnerable to attacks that are happening in malicious clients through data poisoning and model poisoning, which can deteriorate the performance of aggregated global model. Existing defense methods typically focus on mitigating specific types of poisoning and are often ineffective against unseen types of attack. These methods also assume an attack happened moderately while is not always holds true in real. Consequently, these methods can significantly fail in terms of accuracy and robustness when detecting and addressing updates from attacked malicious clients. To overcome these challenges, in this work, we propose a simple yet effective framework to detect malicious clients, namely Confidence-Aware Defense (CAD), that utilizes the confidence scores of local models as criteria to evaluate the reliability of local updates. Our key insight is that malicious attacks, regardless of attack type, will cause the model to deviate from its previous state, thus leading to increased uncertainty when making predictions. Therefore, CAD is comprehensively effective for both model poisoning and data poisoning attacks by accurately identifying and mitigating potential malicious updates, even under varying degrees of attacks and data heterogeneity. Experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly enhances the robustness of FL systems against various types of attacks across various scenarios by achieving higher model accuracy and stability.

Read more

8/20/2024

Multi-Model based Federated Learning Against Model Poisoning Attack: A Deep Learning Based Model Selection for MEC Systems
Total Score

0

Multi-Model based Federated Learning Against Model Poisoning Attack: A Deep Learning Based Model Selection for MEC Systems

Somayeh Kianpisheh, Chafika Benzaid, Tarik Taleb

Federated Learning (FL) enables training of a global model from distributed data, while preserving data privacy. However, the singular-model based operation of FL is open with uploading poisoned models compatible with the global model structure and can be exploited as a vulnerability to conduct model poisoning attacks. This paper proposes a multi-model based FL as a proactive mechanism to enhance the opportunity of model poisoning attack mitigation. A master model is trained by a set of slave models. To enhance the opportunity of attack mitigation, the structure of client models dynamically change within learning epochs, and the supporter FL protocol is provided. For a MEC system, the model selection problem is modeled as an optimization to minimize loss and recognition time, while meeting a robustness confidence. In adaption with dynamic network condition, a deep reinforcement learning based model selection is proposed. For a DDoS attack detection scenario, results illustrate a competitive accuracy gain under poisoning attack with the scenario that the system is without attack, and also a potential of recognition time improvement.

Read more

9/14/2024