Responsible AI for Test Equity and Quality: The Duolingo English Test as a Case Study
0
🤖
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- AI creates opportunities and risks for assessments
- Responsible AI (RAI) practices aim to mitigate risks associated with AI
- This chapter examines the role of RAI in ensuring test quality and equity
- It presents a case study on the Duolingo English Test (DET), an AI-powered English language assessment
Plain English Explanation
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in assessments can bring both benefits and challenges. On one hand, AI can help make assessments more efficient, such as generating test questions or scoring spoken and written responses. On the other hand, AI also poses risks, such as the potential for bias in the content it generates.
Responsible AI (RAI) practices aim to address these risks and ensure that AI is used in a safe and ethical manner. This chapter focuses on the critical role of RAI in achieving two important goals: test quality (making sure test scores accurately reflect what they are supposed to measure) and test equity (ensuring fairness for all test takers).
To illustrate these concepts, the chapter presents a case study of the Duolingo English Test (DET), an AI-powered English language assessment. It discusses the RAI standards developed for the DET, how they were created, and how they relate to broader principles of responsible AI. The chapter also provides specific examples of RAI practices used in the DET and how they help address key ethical principles, such as validity, reliability, fairness, privacy, security, transparency, and accountability.
Technical Explanation
The chapter explores the opportunities and risks presented by the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in educational assessments. It highlights how AI can introduce efficiencies, such as automated item generation and scoring of spoken and written responses, while also posing risks, such as the potential for bias in AI-generated content.
To address these risks, the chapter examines the critical role of Responsible AI (RAI) practices in ensuring test quality (the appropriateness of test score inferences) and test equity (fairness to all test takers). The chapter presents a case study of the Duolingo English Test (DET), an AI-powered, high-stakes English language assessment, to illustrate these concepts.
The chapter discusses the DET's RAI standards, their development, and their relationship to domain-agnostic RAI principles. It provides examples of specific RAI practices used in the DET and demonstrates how these practices address key ethical principles, such as validity, reliability, fairness, privacy, security, transparency, and accountability, to ensure test quality and equity.
Critical Analysis
The chapter provides a comprehensive examination of the role of Responsible AI (RAI) in ensuring the quality and equity of assessments that leverage artificial intelligence (AI). The case study of the Duolingo English Test (DET) offers a concrete example of how RAI principles can be applied in practice.
One potential limitation of the chapter is that it focuses on a single case study, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. It would be valuable to see additional case studies or a more comprehensive analysis of RAI practices across a range of AI-powered assessments.
Additionally, the chapter does not delve deeply into the specific technical details of the DET's AI systems or the detailed implementation of the RAI practices. While the high-level overview is informative, some readers may be interested in a more technical exploration of these aspects.
Overall, the chapter provides a strong foundation for understanding the importance of RAI in the context of educational assessments and offers a useful starting point for further research and discussion in this area.
Conclusion
This chapter highlights the critical role of Responsible AI (RAI) practices in ensuring the quality and equity of assessments that leverage artificial intelligence (AI). By presenting a case study of the Duolingo English Test (DET), an AI-powered English language assessment, the chapter demonstrates how specific RAI practices can be implemented to address key ethical principles, such as validity, reliability, fairness, privacy, security, transparency, and accountability.
The insights provided in this chapter have important implications for the broader field of educational measurement and assessment, as the use of AI continues to grow. By prioritizing responsible AI practices, educators and assessment developers can unlock the benefits of AI while mitigating the risks, ultimately ensuring that assessments are fair, accurate, and equitable for all test takers.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
0
Responsible AI for Test Equity and Quality: The Duolingo English Test as a Case Study
Jill Burstein, Geoffrey T. LaFlair, Kevin Yancey, Alina A. von Davier, Ravit Dotan
Artificial intelligence (AI) creates opportunities for assessments, such as efficiencies for item generation and scoring of spoken and written responses. At the same time, it poses risks (such as bias in AI-generated item content). Responsible AI (RAI) practices aim to mitigate risks associated with AI. This chapter addresses the critical role of RAI practices in achieving test quality (appropriateness of test score inferences), and test equity (fairness to all test takers). To illustrate, the chapter presents a case study using the Duolingo English Test (DET), an AI-powered, high-stakes English language assessment. The chapter discusses the DET RAI standards, their development and their relationship to domain-agnostic RAI principles. Further, it provides examples of specific RAI practices, showing how these practices meaningfully address the ethical principles of validity and reliability, fairness, privacy and security, and transparency and accountability standards to ensure test equity and quality.
Read more9/14/2024
0
Responsible AI Question Bank: A Comprehensive Tool for AI Risk Assessment
Sung Une Lee, Harsha Perera, Yue Liu, Boming Xia, Qinghua Lu, Liming Zhu
The rapid growth of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has underscored the urgent need for responsible AI practices. Despite increasing interest, a comprehensive AI risk assessment toolkit remains lacking. This study introduces our Responsible AI (RAI) Question Bank, a comprehensive framework and tool designed to support diverse AI initiatives. By integrating AI ethics principles such as fairness, transparency, and accountability into a structured question format, the RAI Question Bank aids in identifying potential risks, aligning with emerging regulations like the EU AI Act, and enhancing overall AI governance. A key benefit of the RAI Question Bank is its systematic approach to linking lower-level risk questions to higher-level ones and related themes, preventing siloed assessments and ensuring a cohesive evaluation process. Case studies illustrate the practical application of the RAI Question Bank in assessing AI projects, from evaluating risk factors to informing decision-making processes. The study also demonstrates how the RAI Question Bank can be used to ensure compliance with standards, mitigate risks, and promote the development of trustworthy AI systems. This work advances RAI by providing organizations with a valuable tool to navigate the complexities of ethical AI development and deployment while ensuring comprehensive risk management.
Read more8/23/2024
0
Using Case Studies to Teach Responsible AI to Industry Practitioners
Julia Stoyanovich, Rodrigo Kreis de Paula, Armanda Lewis, Chloe Zheng
Responsible AI (RAI) is the science and the practice of making the design, development, and use of AI socially sustainable: of reaping the benefits of innovation while controlling the risks. Naturally, industry practitioners play a decisive role in our collective ability to achieve the goals of RAI. Unfortunately, we do not yet have consolidated educational materials and effective methodologies for teaching RAI to practitioners. In this paper, we propose a novel stakeholder-first educational approach that uses interactive case studies to achieve organizational and practitioner -level engagement and advance learning of RAI. We discuss a partnership with Meta, an international technology company, to co-develop and deliver RAI workshops to a diverse audience within the company. Our assessment results indicate that participants found the workshops engaging and reported a positive shift in understanding and motivation to apply RAI to their work.
Read more7/25/2024
👀
0
The Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Educational Measurement: Opportunities and Ethical Challenges
Okan Bulut, Maggie Beiting-Parrish, Jodi M. Casabianca, Sharon C. Slater, Hong Jiao, Dan Song, Christopher M. Ormerod, Deborah Gbemisola Fabiyi, Rodica Ivan, Cole Walsh, Oscar Rios, Joshua Wilson, Seyma N. Yildirim-Erbasli, Tarid Wongvorachan, Joyce Xinle Liu, Bin Tan, Polina Morilova
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in educational measurement has revolutionized assessment methods, enabling automated scoring, rapid content analysis, and personalized feedback through machine learning and natural language processing. These advancements provide timely, consistent feedback and valuable insights into student performance, thereby enhancing the assessment experience. However, the deployment of AI in education also raises significant ethical concerns regarding validity, reliability, transparency, fairness, and equity. Issues such as algorithmic bias and the opacity of AI decision-making processes pose risks of perpetuating inequalities and affecting assessment outcomes. Responding to these concerns, various stakeholders, including educators, policymakers, and organizations, have developed guidelines to ensure ethical AI use in education. The National Council of Measurement in Education's Special Interest Group on AI in Measurement and Education (AIME) also focuses on establishing ethical standards and advancing research in this area. In this paper, a diverse group of AIME members examines the ethical implications of AI-powered tools in educational measurement, explores significant challenges such as automation bias and environmental impact, and proposes solutions to ensure AI's responsible and effective use in education.
Read more6/28/2024