Rethinking Digitalization and Climate: Don't Predict, Mitigate

Overview

• Digitalization is a key part of the transition to a green economy.
• Current research focuses on measuring and predicting the climate impact of digitalization using life-cycle assessments and scenario models.
• The paper argues that this approach is flawed due to three underlying assumptions that are problematic.

Plain English Explanation

The paper suggests that the common approach of trying to quantify the digital carbon footprint and predict the climate effects of digitalization is misguided. It challenges three key assumptions behind these efforts:

1. The digital carbon footprint can be quantified: The paper argues this is inherently uncertain and unpredictable.
2. There will be a "business-as-usual" trajectory with episodic change leading to a new stable state: The reality of digitalization is more complex, with ongoing rapid change.
3. Investments in digitalization will be delivered as planned: In reality, the costs, timelines, and benefits of digital projects often differ from initial projections.

Instead of focusing on prediction, the paper proposes rethinking the approach to focus on mitigating the climate impacts of digitalization based on the inherent uncertainty.

Technical Explanation

The paper challenges the prevailing research approach of using life-cycle assessments and baseline scenario methodologies to quantify and predict the climate effects of digitalization. It identifies three implicit assumptions underlying these methods:

1. Quantifiability of the digital carbon footprint: The paper argues this is an inherently uncertain and unpredictable metric.
2. Business-as-usual trajectory with episodic change: It suggests the reality of digitalization involves ongoing rapid change, rather than a stable state.
3. Realization of planned digital investments: In practice, the costs, timelines, and benefits of digital projects often deviate from initial business cases.

The paper builds on uncertainty literature to propose a shift in approach from prediction to mitigation, acknowledging the limits of forecasting the climate impact of digitalization.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case that the current research focus on predicting the climate effects of digitalization is flawed due to the problematic nature of the underlying assumptions. However, it provides limited empirical evidence to support its claims about the inherent unpredictability of the digital carbon footprint and the challenges of realizing planned digital investments.

While the paper rightly points out the complexity and uncertainty involved, it could be strengthened by acknowledging the potential value of quantitative assessments and scenario analysis, even if they cannot provide precise forecasts. Additionally, the paper could explore more specific suggestions for how to shift the research and practice towards a mitigation-focused approach, beyond the general call to "rethink" the problem.

Conclusion

This paper challenges the prevailing research approach to the climate impact of digitalization, arguing that attempts to quantify and predict these effects are based on faulty assumptions. Instead, it proposes a shift in focus from prediction to mitigation, acknowledging the inherent uncertainty involved. This shift in perspective could help guide more effective strategies for reducing the environmental impact of digital technologies and supporting the green transition.