Assessing Climate Transition Risks in the Colombian Processed Food Sector: A Fuzzy Logic and Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach

Read original: arXiv:2404.16055 - Published 4/26/2024 by Juan F. P'erez-P'erez, Pablo Isaza G'omez, Isis Bonet, Mar'ia Solange S'anchez-Pinz'on, Fabio Caraffini, Christian Lochmuller
Total Score

0

🔍

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Identifying and assessing climate-related risks is a growing challenge for organizations
  • This study focuses on identifying and assessing the main climate transition risks in the Colombian processed food sector
  • The approach uses Fuzzy Logic and compares it to multi-criteria decision-making methods to classify different climate transition risks

Plain English Explanation

Climate change is becoming an increasingly important issue for businesses to consider. Identifying and assessing the climate-related risks that organizations face can be difficult, as these risks can come from many different sources. This study looked at the main climate transition risks facing the Colombian processed food sector.

Transition risks, which are the risks associated with the shift to a low-carbon economy, can be vague and hard to define. To address this, the researchers used a technique called Fuzzy Logic, as well as various multi-criteria decision-making methods, to classify the different climate transition risks that this organization might be exposed to. This allowed them to use everyday language to describe the risks and their potential consequences.

The results showed that the most critical risks for this organization were:

  1. Price volatility and availability of raw materials
  2. The need to shift to less carbon-intensive production or consumption patterns
  3. Increases in carbon taxes
  4. Technological changes and the associated costs of development or implementation

These risks were found to be at a "critical" level, meaning they are the most significant for this organization. This highlights the importance of the investments needed for organizations to meet regulatory requirements, which are a key driver of climate-related risks at the financial level.

Technical Explanation

This study employed a multi-criteria decision-making approach, including Fuzzy Logic, to identify and assess the main climate transition risks facing the Colombian processed food sector. Transition risks, which are the risks associated with the shift to a low-carbon economy, can be difficult to define and categorize.

The researchers used linguistic expressions to capture the vagueness and uncertainty inherent in climate transition risks. They compared the results of the Fuzzy Logic approach to other multi-criteria decision-making methods, such as Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), to classify the different climate transition risks the organization might face.

The results showed that the most critical risks for the organization were price volatility and raw materials availability, the need to shift to less carbon-intensive production or consumption patterns, increases in carbon taxes, and technological changes and associated costs. These risks were found to be at a "critical" level, indicating they are the most significant for the organization.

These findings highlight the importance of the investments needed for organizations to meet regulatory requirements, which are a key driver of climate-related risks at the financial level. The study demonstrates the value of using Fuzzy Logic and multi-criteria decision-making techniques to better understand and assess complex climate-related risks.

Critical Analysis

The study provides a useful framework for organizations to identify and assess their climate transition risks, particularly in sectors like the Colombian processed food industry. The use of Fuzzy Logic and multi-criteria decision-making methods allows for a more nuanced and contextual analysis of these risks, which can be difficult to quantify using traditional risk assessment approaches.

However, the study is limited to a single case study in the Colombian context. Further research would be needed to understand how these climate transition risks might differ in other regions or industries. Additionally, the study does not delve into the specific strategies or actions organizations can take to mitigate these risks, which would be valuable information for decision-makers.

Overall, this study offers a valuable contribution to the growing body of research on climate risk assessment and management. By highlighting the critical climate transition risks facing the Colombian processed food sector, it provides a model for other organizations to follow in assessing and addressing their own climate-related vulnerabilities.

Conclusion

This study presents a novel approach to identifying and assessing climate transition risks in the Colombian processed food sector. By using Fuzzy Logic and multi-criteria decision-making methods, the researchers were able to classify the most critical risks facing the organization, including price volatility, shifts in production and consumption patterns, carbon taxes, and technological changes.

The findings underscore the importance of organizations making investments to meet regulatory requirements, which are a key driver of climate-related financial risks. While the study is limited to a single case, it offers a valuable framework for other organizations to follow in assessing and managing their own climate transition risks.

As the impacts of climate change continue to escalate, the ability to accurately identify and mitigate climate-related risks will be increasingly vital for businesses across all sectors. This study represents an important step forward in developing effective strategies for navigating the complex landscape of climate transition risks.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔍

Total Score

0

Assessing Climate Transition Risks in the Colombian Processed Food Sector: A Fuzzy Logic and Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach

Juan F. P'erez-P'erez, Pablo Isaza G'omez, Isis Bonet, Mar'ia Solange S'anchez-Pinz'on, Fabio Caraffini, Christian Lochmuller

Climate risk assessment is becoming increasingly important. For organisations, identifying and assessing climate-related risks is challenging, as they can come from multiple sources. This study identifies and assesses the main climate transition risks in the colombian processed food sector. As transition risks are vague, our approach uses Fuzzy Logic and compares it to various multi-criteria decision-making methods to classify the different climate transition risks an organisation may be exposed to. This approach allows us to use linguistic expressions for risk analysis and to better describe risks and their consequences. The results show that the risks ranked as the most critical for this organisation in their order were price volatility and raw materials availability, the change to less carbon-intensive production or consumption patterns, the increase in carbon taxes and technological change, and the associated development or implementation costs. These risks show a critical risk level, which implies that they are the most significant risks for the organisation in the case study. These results highlight the importance of investments needed to meet regulatory requirements, which are the main drivers for organisations at the financial level.

Read more

4/26/2024

Cross-Country Comparative Analysis of Climate Resilience and Localized Mapping in Data-Sparse Regions
Total Score

0

New!Cross-Country Comparative Analysis of Climate Resilience and Localized Mapping in Data-Sparse Regions

Ronald Katende

Climate resilience across sectors varies significantly in low-income countries (LICs), with agriculture being the most vulnerable to climate change. Existing studies typically focus on individual countries, offering limited insights into broader cross-country patterns of adaptation and vulnerability. This paper addresses these gaps by introducing a framework for cross-country comparative analysis of sectoral climate resilience using meta-analysis and cross-country panel data techniques. The study identifies shared vulnerabilities and adaptation strategies across LICs, enabling more effective policy design. Additionally, a novel localized climate-agriculture mapping technique is developed, integrating sparse agricultural data with high-resolution satellite imagery to generate fine-grained maps of agricultural productivity under climate stress. Spatial interpolation methods, such as kriging, are used to address data gaps, providing detailed insights into regional agricultural productivity and resilience. The findings offer policymakers tools to prioritize climate adaptation efforts and optimize resource allocation both regionally and nationally.

Read more

9/16/2024

🎲

Total Score

0

Rethinking Digitalization and Climate: Don't Predict, Mitigate

Daria Gritsenko, Jon Aaen, Bent Flyvbjerg

Digitalization is a core component of the green transition. Today's focus is on quantifying and pre-dicting the climate effects of digitalization through various life-cycle assessments and baseline sce-nario methodologies. Here we argue that this is a mistake. Most attempts at prediction are based on three implicit assumptions: (a) the digital carbon footprint can be quantified, (b) business-as-usual with episodic change leading to a new era of stability, and (c) investments in digitalization will be delivered within the cost, timeframe, and benefits described in their business cases. We problema-tize each assumption within the context of digitalization and argue that the digital carbon footprint is inherently unpredictable. We build on uncertainty literature to show that even if you cannot predict, you can still mitigate. On that basis, we propose to rethink practice on the digital carbon footprint from prediction to mitigation.

Read more

7/23/2024

Representation Learning of Complex Assemblies, An Effort to Improve Corporate Scope 3 Emissions Calculation
Total Score

0

Representation Learning of Complex Assemblies, An Effort to Improve Corporate Scope 3 Emissions Calculation

Ajay Chatterjee, Srikanth Ranganathan

Climate change is a pressing global concern for governments, corporations, and citizens alike. This concern underscores the necessity for these entities to accurately assess the climate impact of manufacturing goods and providing services. Tools like process life cycle analysis (pLCA) are used to evaluate the climate impact of production, use, and disposal, from raw material mining through end-of-life. pLCA further enables practitioners to look deeply into material choices or manufacturing processes for individual parts, sub-assemblies, assemblies, and the final product. Reliable and detailed data on the life cycle stages and processes of the product or service under study are not always available or accessible, resulting in inaccurate assessment of climate impact. To overcome the data limitation and enhance the effectiveness of pLCA to generate an improved environmental impact profile, we are adopting an innovative strategy to identify alternative parts, products, and components that share similarities in terms of their form, function, and performance to serve as qualified substitutes. Focusing on enterprise electronics hardware, we propose a semi-supervised learning-based framework to identify substitute parts that leverages product bill of material (BOM) data and a small amount of component-level qualified substitute data (positive samples) to generate machine knowledge graph (MKG) and learn effective embeddings of the components that constitute electronic hardware. Our methodology is grounded in attributed graph embeddings and introduces a strategy to generate biased negative samples to significantly enhance the training process. We demonstrate improved performance and generalization over existing published models.

Read more

9/9/2024