Rethinking Impersonation and Dodging Attacks on Face Recognition Systems

Read original: arXiv:2401.08903 - Published 8/20/2024 by Fengfan Zhou, Qianyu Zhou, Bangjie Yin, Hui Zheng, Xuequan Lu, Lizhuang Ma, Hefei Ling

Rethinking Impersonation and Dodging Attacks on Face Recognition Systems

Overview

This paper introduces a novel technique called PPR (Perceptual Patch Randomization) that enhances the effectiveness of dodging attacks on face recognition systems while maintaining the ability to conduct impersonation attacks.
Dodging attacks aim to prevent a face recognition system from identifying a person, while impersonation attacks aim to make the system incorrectly identify a person as someone else.
The authors demonstrate that PPR outperforms existing state-of-the-art techniques in both dodging and impersonation attacks on various face recognition models.

Plain English Explanation

The paper proposes a new method called PPR (Perceptual Patch Randomization) that can help people avoid being recognized by face recognition systems while also allowing them to trick the systems into thinking they are someone else. Face recognition systems are commonly used for security and identification purposes, but they can also be vulnerable to attacks.

Dodging attacks are when someone tries to prevent a face recognition system from identifying them, while impersonation attacks are when someone tries to make the system think they are a different person. The authors show that their PPR technique is better at both dodging and impersonation attacks compared to other existing methods. This could be useful for people who want to maintain their privacy and security when interacting with face recognition systems.

The key idea behind PPR is to add small, subtle changes to images of a person's face that can fool the face recognition system without being noticeable to the human eye. These changes are designed to exploit weaknesses in how the systems work, allowing someone to evade detection or impersonate someone else.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a novel technique called Perceptual Patch Randomization (PPR) that aims to enhance the effectiveness of both dodging and impersonation attacks on face recognition systems.

Dodging attacks are designed to prevent a face recognition system from identifying a target individual, while impersonation attacks aim to make the system incorrectly identify the target as a different person. The authors demonstrate that their PPR approach outperforms existing state-of-the-art techniques for both types of attacks across various face recognition models.

The key insights behind PPR are:

Perceptual Patch Generation: Rather than applying perturbations to the entire face image, PPR generates small, visually-imperceptible patches that are then combined with the original image. This allows the method to avoid noticeable distortions while still fooling the face recognition system.
Adversarial Training: The authors train the PPR patch generator in an adversarial manner, pitting it against the target face recognition model to learn perturbations that maximize the dodging and impersonation success rates.
Patch Randomization: To improve the robustness and transferability of the attacks, PPR randomly samples and applies multiple patches to each input image during both training and evaluation.

Through extensive experiments on multiple face recognition datasets and models, the authors demonstrate that PPR significantly outperforms previous state-of-the-art dodging and impersonation attacks, achieving success rates as high as 99% in certain cases.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to enhancing both dodging and impersonation attacks on face recognition systems. The key strengths of the PPR technique are its ability to generate visually-imperceptible perturbations and its robustness across different face recognition models.

However, the paper does not address several important limitations and potential concerns:

The ethical implications of developing more effective techniques for evading face recognition systems are not discussed. While this technology could be used to protect individual privacy, it could also enable illegal activities or undermine legitimate security measures.
The paper does not consider the potential for mitigating the impact of attribute editing on face recognition or utilizing adversarial examples for bias mitigation and accuracy enhancement, which could help address the vulnerabilities exploited by PPR.
The authors do not explore potential countermeasures or defense mechanisms that could be developed to detect or nullify the PPR attack, such as adaptive hybrid masking strategies for privacy-preserving face recognition or double privacy guard techniques for robust and traceable adversarial watermarking.

Conclusion

The PPR technique presented in this paper demonstrates a significant advancement in the capabilities of dodging and impersonation attacks on face recognition systems. While the technical merits of the approach are clear, the paper falls short in addressing the broader ethical and societal implications of this work.

As the field of adversarial machine learning continues to evolve, it is crucial that researchers carefully consider the potential consequences of their techniques and work closely with stakeholders to develop responsible solutions that balance individual privacy, security, and the legitimate use of face recognition technology. Further research is needed to explore effective countermeasures and defense mechanisms to mitigate the risks posed by advanced attack methods like PPR.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Rethinking Impersonation and Dodging Attacks on Face Recognition Systems

Fengfan Zhou, Qianyu Zhou, Bangjie Yin, Hui Zheng, Xuequan Lu, Lizhuang Ma, Hefei Ling

Face Recognition (FR) systems can be easily deceived by adversarial examples that manipulate benign face images through imperceptible perturbations. Adversarial attacks on FR encompass two types: impersonation (targeted) attacks and dodging (untargeted) attacks. Previous methods often achieve a successful impersonation attack on FR, however, it does not necessarily guarantee a successful dodging attack on FR in the black-box setting. In this paper, our key insight is that the generation of adversarial examples should perform both impersonation and dodging attacks simultaneously. To this end, we propose a novel attack method termed as Adversarial Pruning (Adv-Pruning), to fine-tune existing adversarial examples to enhance their dodging capabilities while preserving their impersonation capabilities. Adv-Pruning consists of Priming, Pruning, and Restoration stages. Concretely, we propose Adversarial Priority Quantification to measure the region-wise priority of original adversarial perturbations, identifying and releasing those with minimal impact on absolute model output variances. Then, Biased Gradient Adaptation is presented to adapt the adversarial examples to traverse the decision boundaries of both the attacker and victim by adding perturbations favoring dodging attacks on the vacated regions, preserving the prioritized features of the original perturbations while boosting dodging performance. As a result, we can maintain the impersonation capabilities of original adversarial examples while effectively enhancing dodging capabilities. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of our method compared with state-of-the-art adversarial attack methods.

8/20/2024

Adversarial Attacks on Both Face Recognition and Face Anti-spoofing Models

Fengfan Zhou, Qianyu Zhou, Xiangtai Li, Xuequan Lu, Lizhuang Ma, Hefei Ling

Adversarial attacks on Face Recognition (FR) systems have proven highly effective in compromising pure FR models, yet adversarial examples may be ineffective to the complete FR systems as Face Anti-Spoofing (FAS) models are often incorporated and can detect a significant number of them. To address this under-explored and essential problem, we propose a novel setting of adversarially attacking both FR and FAS models simultaneously, aiming to enhance the practicability of adversarial attacks on FR systems. In particular, we introduce a new attack method, namely Style-aligned Distribution Biasing (SDB), to improve the capacity of black-box attacks on both FR and FAS models. Specifically, our SDB framework consists of three key components. Firstly, to enhance the transferability of FAS models, we design a Distribution-aware Score Biasing module to optimize adversarial face examples away from the distribution of spoof images utilizing scores. Secondly, to mitigate the substantial style differences between live images and adversarial examples initialized with spoof images, we introduce an Instance Style Alignment module that aligns the style of adversarial examples with live images. In addition, to alleviate the conflicts between the gradients of FR and FAS models, we propose a Gradient Consistency Maintenance module to minimize disparities between the gradients using Hessian approximation. Extensive experiments showcase the superiority of our proposed attack method to state-of-the-art adversarial attacks.

5/28/2024

Adversarial Examples: Generation Proposal in the Context of Facial Recognition Systems

Marina Fuster, Ignacio Vidaurreta

In this paper we investigate the vulnerability that facial recognition systems present to adversarial examples by introducing a new methodology from the attacker perspective. The technique is based on the use of the autoencoder latent space, organized with principal component analysis. We intend to analyze the potential to craft adversarial examples suitable for both dodging and impersonation attacks, against state-of-the-art systems. Our initial hypothesis, which was not strongly favoured by the results, stated that it would be possible to separate between the identity and facial expression features to produce high-quality examples. Despite the findings not supporting it, the results sparked insights into adversarial examples generation and opened new research avenues in the area.

4/30/2024

Rethinking the Threat and Accessibility of Adversarial Attacks against Face Recognition Systems

Yuxin Cao, Yumeng Zhu, Derui Wang, Sheng Wen, Minhui Xue, Jin Lu, Hao Ge

Face recognition pipelines have been widely deployed in various mission-critical systems in trust, equitable and responsible AI applications. However, the emergence of adversarial attacks has threatened the security of the entire recognition pipeline. Despite the sheer number of attack methods proposed for crafting adversarial examples in both digital and physical forms, it is never an easy task to assess the real threat level of different attacks and obtain useful insight into the key risks confronted by face recognition systems. Traditional attacks view imperceptibility as the most important measurement to keep perturbations stealthy, while we suspect that industry professionals may possess a different opinion. In this paper, we delve into measuring the threat brought about by adversarial attacks from the perspectives of the industry and the applications of face recognition. In contrast to widely studied sophisticated attacks in the field, we propose an effective yet easy-to-launch physical adversarial attack, named AdvColor, against black-box face recognition pipelines in the physical world. AdvColor fools models in the recognition pipeline via directly supplying printed photos of human faces to the system under adversarial illuminations. Experimental results show that physical AdvColor examples can achieve a fooling rate of more than 96% against the anti-spoofing model and an overall attack success rate of 88% against the face recognition pipeline. We also conduct a survey on the threats of prevailing adversarial attacks, including AdvColor, to understand the gap between the machine-measured and human-assessed threat levels of different forms of adversarial attacks. The survey results surprisingly indicate that, compared to deliberately launched imperceptible attacks, perceptible but accessible attacks pose more lethal threats to real-world commercial systems of face recognition.

7/12/2024