Rethinking Medical Anomaly Detection in Brain MRI: An Image Quality Assessment Perspective

Read original: arXiv:2408.08228 - Published 8/16/2024 by Zixuan Pan, Jun Xia, Zheyu Yan, Guoyue Xu, Yawen Wu, Zhenge Jia, Jianxu Chen, Yiyu Shi
Total Score

0

Rethinking Medical Anomaly Detection in Brain MRI: An Image Quality Assessment Perspective

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Rethinks medical anomaly detection in brain MRI from an image quality assessment perspective
  • Proposes a new framework that leverages image quality assessment (IQA) to enhance anomaly detection in brain MRI
  • Demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed approach through extensive experiments

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores a new way to detect abnormalities or anomalies in brain MRI scans. Traditional anomaly detection methods often focus solely on finding unusual patterns in the brain images. However, the researchers argue that the quality of the MRI images themselves can also play a crucial role in accurately identifying anomalies.

The proposed framework incorporates <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/study-adequacy-common-iqa-measures-medical-images">image quality assessment (IQA)</a> techniques to enhance the anomaly detection process. By evaluating factors like noise, contrast, and sharpness of the MRI images, the system can better distinguish between true anomalies and artifacts caused by poor image quality.

The researchers demonstrate the benefits of their approach through extensive experiments, showing that it outperforms conventional anomaly detection methods in terms of accuracy and reliability. This suggests that considering image quality is an important, but often overlooked, aspect of medical anomaly detection that can lead to more robust and trustworthy results.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a novel framework that leverages <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/study-why-we-need-to-reassess-full">image quality assessment (IQA)</a> to enhance anomaly detection in brain MRI. The key idea is to incorporate IQA metrics as additional features to improve the performance of anomaly detection models.

The proposed framework consists of two main components:

  1. IQA Module: This module evaluates the quality of input MRI images using various IQA metrics, such as noise, contrast, and sharpness. The IQA features are then concatenated with the original image features.

  2. Anomaly Detection Module: This module uses the combined features (original image features + IQA features) to detect anomalies in the brain MRI scans. The researchers experiment with different anomaly detection models, including <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/leveraging-mahalanobis-distance-to-enhance-unsupervised-brain">Mahalanobis distance-based methods</a> and <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/s-iqa-image-quality-assessment-compressive-sampling">denoising diffusion probabilistic models (DDPMs)</a>.

The key insight is that by considering image quality, the anomaly detection model can better distinguish true anomalies from artifacts caused by poor image quality. This leads to improved detection accuracy and reliability, as demonstrated through extensive experiments on various brain MRI datasets.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling case for incorporating image quality assessment into medical anomaly detection, highlighting the limitations of existing approaches that solely focus on finding unusual patterns in the image data.

One potential limitation of the study is the reliance on a limited set of IQA metrics. The researchers acknowledge that there may be other IQA measures or combinations thereof that could further enhance the anomaly detection performance. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/charting-path-forward-ct-image-quality-assessment">Exploring a wider range of IQA techniques</a> could be an area for future research.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential clinical implications of the proposed framework. While the technical results are promising, more research is needed to understand how this approach would translate to real-world medical decision-making and its impact on patient outcomes.

Conclusion

The paper presents a novel approach to medical anomaly detection in brain MRI that integrates image quality assessment. By considering factors like noise, contrast, and sharpness, the proposed framework can better distinguish true anomalies from artifacts caused by poor image quality, leading to improved detection accuracy and reliability.

The findings of this study suggest that a more holistic approach to medical anomaly detection, one that incorporates image quality assessment, could be a valuable step towards developing more robust and trustworthy diagnostic tools. As the field of medical imaging continues to evolve, this research highlights the importance of considering image quality as a crucial factor in enhancing the performance and reliability of anomaly detection systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Rethinking Medical Anomaly Detection in Brain MRI: An Image Quality Assessment Perspective
Total Score

0

Rethinking Medical Anomaly Detection in Brain MRI: An Image Quality Assessment Perspective

Zixuan Pan, Jun Xia, Zheyu Yan, Guoyue Xu, Yawen Wu, Zhenge Jia, Jianxu Chen, Yiyu Shi

Reconstruction-based methods, particularly those leveraging autoencoders, have been widely adopted to perform anomaly detection in brain MRI. While most existing works try to improve detection accuracy by proposing new model structures or algorithms, we tackle the problem through image quality assessment, an underexplored perspective in the field. We propose a fusion quality loss function that combines Structural Similarity Index Measure loss with l1 loss, offering a more comprehensive evaluation of reconstruction quality. Additionally, we introduce a data pre-processing strategy that enhances the average intensity ratio (AIR) between normal and abnormal regions, further improving the distinction of anomalies. By fusing the aforementioned two methods, we devise the image quality assessment (IQA) approach. The proposed IQA approach achieves significant improvements (>10%) in terms of Dice coefficient (DICE) and Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC) on the BraTS21 (T2, FLAIR) and MSULB datasets when compared with state-of-the-art methods. These results highlight the importance of invoking the comprehensive image quality assessment in medical anomaly detection and provide a new perspective for future research in this field.

Read more

8/16/2024

A study of why we need to reassess full reference image quality assessment with medical images
Total Score

0

A study of why we need to reassess full reference image quality assessment with medical images

Anna Breger, Ander Biguri, Malena Sabat'e Landman, Ian Selby, Nicole Amberg, Elisabeth Brunner, Janek Grohl, Sepideh Hatamikia, Clemens Karner, Lipeng Ning, Soren Dittmer, Michael Roberts, AIX-COVNET Collaboration, Carola-Bibiane Schonlieb

Image quality assessment (IQA) is not just indispensable in clinical practice to ensure high standards, but also in the development stage of novel algorithms that operate on medical images with reference data. This paper provides a structured and comprehensive collection of examples where the two most common full reference (FR) image quality measures prove to be unsuitable for the assessment of novel algorithms using different kinds of medical images, including real-world MRI, CT, OCT, X-Ray, digital pathology and photoacoustic imaging data. In particular, the FR-IQA measures PSNR and SSIM are known and tested for working successfully in many natural imaging tasks, but discrepancies in medical scenarios have been noted in the literature. Inconsistencies arising in medical images are not surprising, as they have very different properties than natural images which have not been targeted nor tested in the development of the mentioned measures, and therefore might imply wrong judgement of novel methods for medical images. Therefore, improvement is urgently needed in particular in this era of AI to increase explainability, reproducibility and generalizability in machine learning for medical imaging and beyond. On top of the pitfalls we will provide ideas for future research as well as suggesting guidelines for the usage of FR-IQA measures applied to medical images.

Read more

5/30/2024

A study on the adequacy of common IQA measures for medical images
Total Score

0

A study on the adequacy of common IQA measures for medical images

Anna Breger, Clemens Karner, Ian Selby, Janek Grohl, Soren Dittmer, Edward Lilley, Judith Babar, Jake Beckford, Thomas R Else, Timothy J Sadler, Shahab Shahipasand, Arthikkaa Thavakumar, Michael Roberts, Carola-Bibiane Schonlieb

Image quality assessment (IQA) is standard practice in the development stage of novel machine learning algorithms that operate on images. The most commonly used IQA measures have been developed and tested for natural images, but not in the medical setting. Reported inconsistencies arising in medical images are not surprising, as they have different properties than natural images. In this study, we test the applicability of common IQA measures for medical image data by comparing their assessment to manually rated chest X-ray (5 experts) and photoacoustic image data (2 experts). Moreover, we include supplementary studies on grayscale natural images and accelerated brain MRI data. The results of all experiments show a similar outcome in line with previous findings for medical imaging: PSNR and SSIM in the default setting are in the lower range of the result list and HaarPSI outperforms the other tested measures in the overall performance. Also among the top performers in our medical experiments are the full reference measures FSIM, GMSD, LPIPS and MS-SSIM. Generally, the results on natural images yield considerably higher correlations, suggesting that the additional employment of tailored IQA measures for medical imaging algorithms is needed.

Read more

8/21/2024

Leveraging the Mahalanobis Distance to enhance Unsupervised Brain MRI Anomaly Detection
Total Score

0

Leveraging the Mahalanobis Distance to enhance Unsupervised Brain MRI Anomaly Detection

Finn Behrendt, Debayan Bhattacharya, Robin Mieling, Lennart Maack, Julia Kruger, Roland Opfer, Alexander Schlaefer

Unsupervised Anomaly Detection (UAD) methods rely on healthy data distributions to identify anomalies as outliers. In brain MRI, a common approach is reconstruction-based UAD, where generative models reconstruct healthy brain MRIs, and anomalies are detected as deviations between input and reconstruction. However, this method is sensitive to imperfect reconstructions, leading to false positives that impede the segmentation. To address this limitation, we construct multiple reconstructions with probabilistic diffusion models. We then analyze the resulting distribution of these reconstructions using the Mahalanobis distance to identify anomalies as outliers. By leveraging information about normal variations and covariance of individual pixels within this distribution, we effectively refine anomaly scoring, leading to improved segmentation. Our experimental results demonstrate substantial performance improvements across various data sets. Specifically, compared to relying solely on single reconstructions, our approach achieves relative improvements of 15.9%, 35.4%, 48.0%, and 4.7% in terms of AUPRC for the BRATS21, ATLAS, MSLUB and WMH data sets, respectively.

Read more

7/18/2024