A study on the adequacy of common IQA measures for medical images
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the adequacy of common image quality assessment (IQA) measures for evaluating medical images.
- The researchers investigate whether these commonly used IQA measures are appropriate for assessing the quality of medical images, which have unique characteristics and requirements compared to natural images.
- They conduct experiments to compare the performance of various IQA measures on medical images and provide insights into the limitations of these measures in the medical imaging domain.
Plain English Explanation
When we take medical images, like X-rays or MRIs, we want to make sure the image quality is good enough for doctors to accurately diagnose and treat patients. The researchers behind this paper looked at the common ways we measure image quality, called IQA measures, and checked if they work well for medical images.
Medical images have some unique properties that make them different from regular photos or other types of images. The researchers wondered if the standard IQA measures, which were designed for non-medical images, are really the best way to assess the quality of medical images.
To find out, they ran some experiments comparing how well different IQA measures scored the quality of medical images. Their results showed that the common IQA measures don't always do a great job of capturing what's important for medical images.
The researchers think we need to rethink how we evaluate the quality of medical images and develop new ways of measuring image quality that are tailored to the unique needs of the medical field. This could help ensure doctors get the highest quality images to make accurate diagnoses and provide the best care for patients.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the adequacy of common image quality assessment (IQA) measures for evaluating medical images. The researchers hypothesize that the unique characteristics of medical images, such as their focus on subtle details and diagnostic relevance, may not be well captured by the IQA measures designed for natural images.
To test this hypothesis, the authors conduct experiments comparing the performance of several IQA measures, including PSNR, SSIM, and FSIM, on a dataset of medical images. They generate distorted versions of the medical images and use the IQA measures to assess the quality of the distorted images. The authors then compare the IQA scores to subjective quality ratings provided by medical experts.
The results of the experiments suggest that the common IQA measures do not always align well with the experts' quality assessments for medical images. The researchers found that the IQA measures may fail to capture the diagnostic relevance and subtle details that are crucial for medical image quality.
Based on these findings, the authors conclude that the adequacy of common IQA measures for medical images is limited. They argue that new IQA approaches tailored to the unique requirements of medical imaging are needed to ensure accurate and reliable quality assessment of medical images.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution by highlighting the limitations of common IQA measures in the context of medical imaging. The researchers have identified an important gap in the literature and have conducted a thorough investigation to support their conclusions.
One potential limitation of the study is the relatively small dataset of medical images used in the experiments. While the authors have made efforts to ensure the diversity of the image content, a larger and more comprehensive dataset could strengthen the generalizability of the findings.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed discussion of potential alternative IQA approaches that could be more suitable for medical images. The authors acknowledge the need for new IQA measures tailored to medical imaging, but do not delve into specific recommendations or directions for future research in this area.
Overall, the paper raises important questions about the adequacy of current IQA measures for medical images and underscores the need for further research and development of more appropriate quality assessment tools for the medical imaging domain.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the limitations of commonly used image quality assessment (IQA) measures when applied to medical images. The researchers' experiments demonstrate that these IQA measures, which were primarily designed for natural images, do not always align well with the quality assessments made by medical experts.
The findings suggest that the unique characteristics of medical images, such as their focus on subtle details and diagnostic relevance, are not adequately captured by the standard IQA measures. This gap highlights the need for the development of new IQA approaches tailored specifically to the requirements of medical imaging.
By addressing this issue, the research community can work towards ensuring that medical images are evaluated and processed in a way that best supports accurate diagnoses and effective patient care. The insights provided in this paper lay the groundwork for further research and innovation in the field of medical image quality assessment.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A study on the adequacy of common IQA measures for medical images
Anna Breger, Clemens Karner, Ian Selby, Janek Grohl, Soren Dittmer, Edward Lilley, Judith Babar, Jake Beckford, Thomas R Else, Timothy J Sadler, Shahab Shahipasand, Arthikkaa Thavakumar, Michael Roberts, Carola-Bibiane Schonlieb
Image quality assessment (IQA) is standard practice in the development stage of novel machine learning algorithms that operate on images. The most commonly used IQA measures have been developed and tested for natural images, but not in the medical setting. Reported inconsistencies arising in medical images are not surprising, as they have different properties than natural images. In this study, we test the applicability of common IQA measures for medical image data by comparing their assessment to manually rated chest X-ray (5 experts) and photoacoustic image data (2 experts). Moreover, we include supplementary studies on grayscale natural images and accelerated brain MRI data. The results of all experiments show a similar outcome in line with previous findings for medical imaging: PSNR and SSIM in the default setting are in the lower range of the result list and HaarPSI outperforms the other tested measures in the overall performance. Also among the top performers in our medical experiments are the full reference measures FSIM, GMSD, LPIPS and MS-SSIM. Generally, the results on natural images yield considerably higher correlations, suggesting that the additional employment of tailored IQA measures for medical imaging algorithms is needed.
Read more8/21/2024
0
A study of why we need to reassess full reference image quality assessment with medical images
Anna Breger, Ander Biguri, Malena Sabat'e Landman, Ian Selby, Nicole Amberg, Elisabeth Brunner, Janek Grohl, Sepideh Hatamikia, Clemens Karner, Lipeng Ning, Soren Dittmer, Michael Roberts, AIX-COVNET Collaboration, Carola-Bibiane Schonlieb
Image quality assessment (IQA) is not just indispensable in clinical practice to ensure high standards, but also in the development stage of novel algorithms that operate on medical images with reference data. This paper provides a structured and comprehensive collection of examples where the two most common full reference (FR) image quality measures prove to be unsuitable for the assessment of novel algorithms using different kinds of medical images, including real-world MRI, CT, OCT, X-Ray, digital pathology and photoacoustic imaging data. In particular, the FR-IQA measures PSNR and SSIM are known and tested for working successfully in many natural imaging tasks, but discrepancies in medical scenarios have been noted in the literature. Inconsistencies arising in medical images are not surprising, as they have very different properties than natural images which have not been targeted nor tested in the development of the mentioned measures, and therefore might imply wrong judgement of novel methods for medical images. Therefore, improvement is urgently needed in particular in this era of AI to increase explainability, reproducibility and generalizability in machine learning for medical imaging and beyond. On top of the pitfalls we will provide ideas for future research as well as suggesting guidelines for the usage of FR-IQA measures applied to medical images.
Read more9/25/2024
0
Rethinking Medical Anomaly Detection in Brain MRI: An Image Quality Assessment Perspective
Zixuan Pan, Jun Xia, Zheyu Yan, Guoyue Xu, Yawen Wu, Zhenge Jia, Jianxu Chen, Yiyu Shi
Reconstruction-based methods, particularly those leveraging autoencoders, have been widely adopted to perform anomaly detection in brain MRI. While most existing works try to improve detection accuracy by proposing new model structures or algorithms, we tackle the problem through image quality assessment, an underexplored perspective in the field. We propose a fusion quality loss function that combines Structural Similarity Index Measure loss with l1 loss, offering a more comprehensive evaluation of reconstruction quality. Additionally, we introduce a data pre-processing strategy that enhances the average intensity ratio (AIR) between normal and abnormal regions, further improving the distinction of anomalies. By fusing the aforementioned two methods, we devise the image quality assessment (IQA) approach. The proposed IQA approach achieves significant improvements (>10%) in terms of Dice coefficient (DICE) and Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC) on the BraTS21 (T2, FLAIR) and MSULB datasets when compared with state-of-the-art methods. These results highlight the importance of invoking the comprehensive image quality assessment in medical anomaly detection and provide a new perspective for future research in this field.
Read more8/16/2024
0
S-IQA Image Quality Assessment With Compressive Sampling
Ronghua Liao, Chen Hui, Lang Yuan, Haiqi Zhu, Feng Jiang
No-Reference Image Quality Assessment (NR-IQA) aims at estimating image quality in accordance with subjective human perception. However, most methods focus on exploring increasingly complex networks to improve the final performance,accompanied by limitations on input images. Especially when applied to high-resolution (HR) images, these methods offen have to adjust the size of original image to meet model input.To further alleviate the aforementioned issue, we propose two networks for NR-IQA with Compressive Sampling (dubbed CL-IQA and CS-IQA). They consist of four components: (1) The Compressed Sampling Module (CSM) to sample the image (2)The Adaptive Embedding Module (AEM). The measurements are embedded by AEM to extract high-level features. (3) The Vision Transformer and Scale Swin TranBlocksformer Moudle(SSTM) to extract deep features. (4) The Dual Branch (DB) to get final quality score. Experiments show that our proposed methods outperform other methods on various datasets with less data usage.
Read more9/12/2024