A review on data-driven constitutive laws for solids

Read original: arXiv:2405.03658 - Published 5/7/2024 by Jan Niklas Fuhg, Govinda Anantha Padmanabha, Nikolaos Bouklas, Bahador Bahmani, WaiChing Sun, Nikolaos N. Vlassis, Moritz Flaschel, Pietro Carrara, Laura De Lorenzis
Total Score

0

🏋️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This review article explores state-of-the-art data-driven techniques to discover, encode, and emulate constitutive laws that describe the behavior of solids.
  • The paper aims to provide a taxonomy of a wide range of methodologies developed in recent decades and discuss their benefits and drawbacks for interpreting and forecasting mechanical behavior across different scales.
  • The authors distinguish between machine-learning-based and model-free methods, further categorizing them based on interpretability and the learning process/type of data required.
  • Key issues of generalization and trustworthiness are discussed, along with relevant aspects such as data sampling, experimental design, verification, and validation.

Plain English Explanation

The provided paper is a review that examines advanced data-driven techniques used to understand and predict the mechanical behavior of solid materials. These techniques can be used to uncover the underlying laws or rules that govern how solids respond to different forces and stresses.

The researchers aim to organize and categorize the various methodologies that have been developed in recent years, discussing their strengths and weaknesses for interpreting and forecasting mechanical properties at different scales. They distinguish between approaches that use machine learning algorithms and those that are more "model-free," and further break down the techniques based on how interpretable they are and the type of data they require to learn.

A key focus is on addressing the challenges of ensuring these data-driven models can generalize well and be trusted to make accurate predictions. The paper also touches on important practical considerations like how to effectively sample data, design experiments, and verify and validate the models.

By providing this comprehensive overview, the authors hope to give researchers and engineers a roadmap for navigating the evolving landscape of data-driven techniques for mechanics and materials science.

Technical Explanation

The review article examines a wide range of data-driven techniques that can be used to discover, encode, and emulate constitutive laws - the mathematical relationships that describe the path-independent and path-dependent mechanical response of solid materials.

The authors organize these methodologies into a taxonomy, distinguishing between machine-learning-based approaches and more "model-free" techniques. They further categorize the methods based on their level of interpretability and the type of learning process/data they require.

For the machine-learning-based methods, the researchers discuss how the models can leverage large datasets to learn the underlying rules or laws governing material behavior, often without relying on pre-defined constitutive models. In contrast, the model-free techniques may directly extract constitutive parameters from experimental data.

A key focus is on the challenges of ensuring these data-driven models can generalize well to new situations and be trusted to make accurate predictions. The authors also cover relevant practical considerations, such as effective data sampling, experimental design, verification, and validation.

Critical Analysis

The review provides a comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art in data-driven techniques for mechanics and materials science. By organizing the methodologies into a taxonomy, the authors give researchers a clear framework for understanding the landscape and the trade-offs between different approaches.

One potential limitation is that the paper focuses primarily on solids, while many real-world mechanical systems also involve fluids or fluid-solid interactions. Extending the taxonomy to cover these more complex, multi-physics scenarios could be an area for future work.

Additionally, while the paper discusses the challenges of generalization and trustworthiness, it does not delve deeply into specific solutions or best practices. Readers may seek out additional resources to understand how to effectively address these critical issues in their own research and applications.

Overall, this review serves as a valuable reference for researchers and engineers working to advance the field of data-driven mechanics. By highlighting the current state-of-the-art and key areas for further development, the authors help guide the community towards more robust, reliable, and impactful data-driven models.

Conclusion

This comprehensive review article provides an organized taxonomy of state-of-the-art data-driven techniques for discovering, encoding, and emulating constitutive laws that describe the mechanical behavior of solids. By categorizing the methodologies based on their interpretability and learning process/data requirements, the authors give researchers and engineers a clear roadmap for navigating this rapidly evolving field.

The discussion of the benefits and drawbacks of different approaches, as well as the challenges of generalization and trustworthiness, helps inform the development of more robust, reliable, and impactful data-driven models. While the focus is on solids, the insights provided could also inspire future work to extend these techniques to more complex, multi-physics systems.

Overall, this review serves as an invaluable resource for the mechanics and materials science community, helping to advance the state-of-the-art in data-driven methods for interpreting and forecasting material behavior across different scales.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🏋️

Total Score

0

A review on data-driven constitutive laws for solids

Jan Niklas Fuhg, Govinda Anantha Padmanabha, Nikolaos Bouklas, Bahador Bahmani, WaiChing Sun, Nikolaos N. Vlassis, Moritz Flaschel, Pietro Carrara, Laura De Lorenzis

This review article highlights state-of-the-art data-driven techniques to discover, encode, surrogate, or emulate constitutive laws that describe the path-independent and path-dependent response of solids. Our objective is to provide an organized taxonomy to a large spectrum of methodologies developed in the past decades and to discuss the benefits and drawbacks of the various techniques for interpreting and forecasting mechanics behavior across different scales. Distinguishing between machine-learning-based and model-free methods, we further categorize approaches based on their interpretability and on their learning process/type of required data, while discussing the key problems of generalization and trustworthiness. We attempt to provide a road map of how these can be reconciled in a data-availability-aware context. We also touch upon relevant aspects such as data sampling techniques, design of experiments, verification, and validation.

Read more

5/7/2024

⛏️

Total Score

0

Learning Physics-Consistent Material Behavior Without Prior Knowledge

Zhichao Han, Mohit Pundir, Olga Fink, David S. Kammer

Accurately modeling the mechanical behavior of materials is crucial for numerous engineering applications. The quality of these models depends directly on the accuracy of the constitutive law that defines the stress-strain relation. Discovering these constitutive material laws remains a significant challenge, in particular when only material deformation data is available. To address this challenge, unsupervised machine learning methods have been proposed. However, existing approaches have several limitations: they either fail to ensure that the learned constitutive relations are consistent with physical principles, or they rely on a predefined library of constitutive relations or manually crafted input features. These dependencies require significant expertise and specialized domain knowledge. Here, we introduce a machine learning approach called uLED, which overcomes the limitations by using the input convex neural network (ICNN) as the surrogate constitutive model. We improve the optimization strategy for training ICNN, allowing it to be trained end-to-end using direct strain invariants as input across various materials. Furthermore, we utilize the nodal force equilibrium at the internal domain as the training objective, which enables us to learn the constitutive relation solely from temporal displacement recordings. We validate the effectiveness of the proposed method on a diverse range of material laws. We demonstrate that it is robust to a significant level of noise and that it converges to the ground truth with increasing data resolution. We also show that the model can be effectively trained using a displacement field from a subdomain of the test specimen and that the learned constitutive relation from one material sample is transferable to other samples with different geometries. The developed methodology provides an effective tool for discovering constitutive relations.

Read more

7/31/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Symmetry-enforcing neural networks with applications to constitutive modeling

K'evin Garanger, Julie Kraus, Julian J. Rimoli

The use of machine learning techniques to homogenize the effective behavior of arbitrary microstructures has been shown to be not only efficient but also accurate. In a recent work, we demonstrated how to combine state-of-the-art micromechanical modeling and advanced machine learning techniques to homogenize complex microstructures exhibiting non-linear and history dependent behaviors (Logarzo et al., 2021). The resulting homogenized model, termed smart constitutive law (SCL), enables the adoption of microstructurally informed constitutive laws into finite element solvers at a fraction of the computational cost required by traditional concurrent multiscale approaches. In this work, the capabilities of SCLs are expanded via the introduction of a novel methodology that enforces material symmetries at the neuron level, applicable across various neural network architectures. This approach utilizes tensor-based features in neural networks, facilitating the concise and accurate representation of symmetry-preserving operations, and is general enough to be extend to problems beyond constitutive modeling. Details on the construction of these tensor-based neural networks and their application in learning constitutive laws are presented for both elastic and inelastic materials. The superiority of this approach over traditional neural networks is demonstrated in scenarios with limited data and strong symmetries, through comprehensive testing on various materials, including isotropic neo-Hookean materials and tensegrity lattice metamaterials. This work is concluded by a discussion on the potential of this methodology to discover symmetry bases in materials and by an outline of future research directions.

Read more

8/16/2024

Learning force laws in many-body systems
Total Score

0

Learning force laws in many-body systems

Wentao Yu, Eslam Abdelaleem, Ilya Nemenman, Justin C. Burton

Scientific laws describing natural systems may be more complex than our intuition can handle, thus how we discover laws must change. Machine learning (ML) models can analyze large quantities of data, but their structure should match the underlying physical constraints to provide useful insight. While progress has been made using simulated data where the underlying physics is known, training and validating ML models on experimental data requires fundamentally new approaches. Here we demonstrate and experimentally validate an ML approach that incorporates physical intuition to infer force laws in dusty plasma, a complex, many-body system. Trained on 3D particle trajectories, the model accounts for inherent symmetries, non-identical particles, and learns the effective non-reciprocal forces between particles with exquisite accuracy (R^2>0.99). We validate the model by inferring particle masses in two independent yet consistent ways. The model's accuracy enables precise measurements of particle charge and screening length, discovering violations of common theoretical assumptions. Our ability to identify new physics from experimental data demonstrates how ML-powered approaches can guide new routes of scientific discovery in many-body systems. Furthermore, we anticipate our ML approach to be a starting point for inferring laws from dynamics in a wide range of many-body systems, from colloids to living organisms.

Read more

9/11/2024