RICA2: Rubric-Informed, Calibrated Assessment of Actions

Read original: arXiv:2408.02138 - Published 8/9/2024 by Abrar Majeedi, Viswanatha Reddy Gajjala, Satya Sai Srinath Namburi GNVV, Yin Li
Total Score

0

RICA2: Rubric-Informed, Calibrated Assessment of Actions

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • RICA2 is a method for assessing the quality of actions in video understanding tasks
  • It uses a rubric-informed and calibrated approach to provide more reliable and interpretable assessments
  • The key ideas include using a rubric to define assessment criteria, calibrating the scoring system, and incorporating uncertainty estimates

Plain English Explanation

RICA2 is a way to evaluate how well actions are performed in video analysis tasks. Instead of just giving a simple score, RICA2 uses a detailed set of assessment criteria to provide more meaningful and reliable feedback.

The key steps are:

  1. Defining a rubric - a structured way to assess different aspects of the action
  2. Calibrating the scoring system to ensure consistent and interpretable assessments
  3. Incorporating uncertainty estimates to provide a more complete picture of the action quality

By using this more structured and calibrated approach, RICA2 can give better feedback on how to improve actions in video understanding systems.

Technical Explanation

RICA2 builds on prior work in action quality assessment by introducing a rubric-informed and calibrated approach. The key innovations are:

  1. Rubric-Informed Assessment: The authors define a hierarchical rubric that specifies multiple criteria for assessing action quality, such as efficiency, technique, and style.

  2. Calibrated Scoring: To ensure consistent and interpretable scores, the authors calibrate the scoring system using a data-driven approach. This involves modeling the distribution of human assessments and aligning the automated scores accordingly.

  3. Uncertainty Estimation: RICA2 incorporates uncertainty estimates into the action quality scores, providing a more complete picture of the assessment.

The authors evaluate RICA2 on several video understanding benchmarks and show that it outperforms prior action quality assessment methods in terms of reliability and interpretability.

Critical Analysis

The RICA2 paper makes a strong case for the benefits of a more structured and calibrated approach to action quality assessment. The use of a rubric-informed framework is a particularly compelling idea, as it allows for a more nuanced and diagnostic evaluation of actions.

However, the paper does not fully address the potential challenges in defining and applying the assessment rubric. The rubric development process is not described in detail, and it's unclear how generalizable the proposed rubric is to different domains or tasks. Additionally, the calibration approach, while promising, could be sensitive to the quality and distribution of the training data.

Further research is needed to explore the flexibility and robustness of the RICA2 framework, particularly in terms of its ability to accommodate a wider range of action types and assessment criteria. Incorporating feedback from end-users, such as video analysts or coaches, could also help refine the rubric and make the assessment process more practical and meaningful.

Conclusion

RICA2 represents an important step forward in action quality assessment for video understanding tasks. By incorporating a rubric-informed and calibrated approach, the method provides more reliable and interpretable assessments, which could have significant implications for tasks like skill learning, sports analysis, and human-robot interaction.

While the paper highlights the key conceptual and technical advances, further research is needed to fully explore the practical benefits and limitations of the RICA2 framework. As the field of video understanding continues to evolve, approaches like RICA2 that prioritize interpretability and robustness will likely become increasingly valuable.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

RICA2: Rubric-Informed, Calibrated Assessment of Actions
Total Score

0

RICA2: Rubric-Informed, Calibrated Assessment of Actions

Abrar Majeedi, Viswanatha Reddy Gajjala, Satya Sai Srinath Namburi GNVV, Yin Li

The ability to quantify how well an action is carried out, also known as action quality assessment (AQA), has attracted recent interest in the vision community. Unfortunately, prior methods often ignore the score rubric used by human experts and fall short of quantifying the uncertainty of the model prediction. To bridge the gap, we present RICA^2 - a deep probabilistic model that integrates score rubric and accounts for prediction uncertainty for AQA. Central to our method lies in stochastic embeddings of action steps, defined on a graph structure that encodes the score rubric. The embeddings spread probabilistic density in the latent space and allow our method to represent model uncertainty. The graph encodes the scoring criteria, based on which the quality scores can be decoded. We demonstrate that our method establishes new state of the art on public benchmarks, including FineDiving, MTL-AQA, and JIGSAWS, with superior performance in score prediction and uncertainty calibration. Our code is available at https://abrarmajeedi.github.io/rica2_aqa/

Read more

8/9/2024

Total Score

0

Continual Action Assessment via Task-Consistent Score-Discriminative Feature Distribution Modeling

Yuan-Ming Li, Ling-An Zeng, Jing-Ke Meng, Wei-Shi Zheng

Action Quality Assessment (AQA) is a task that tries to answer how well an action is carried out. While remarkable progress has been achieved, existing works on AQA assume that all the training data are visible for training at one time, but do not enable continual learning on assessing new technical actions. In this work, we address such a Continual Learning problem in AQA (Continual-AQA), which urges a unified model to learn AQA tasks sequentially without forgetting. Our idea for modeling Continual-AQA is to sequentially learn a task-consistent score-discriminative feature distribution, in which the latent features express a strong correlation with the score labels regardless of the task or action types.From this perspective, we aim to mitigate the forgetting in Continual-AQA from two aspects. Firstly, to fuse the features of new and previous data into a score-discriminative distribution, a novel Feature-Score Correlation-Aware Rehearsal is proposed to store and reuse data from previous tasks with limited memory size. Secondly, an Action General-Specific Graph is developed to learn and decouple the action-general and action-specific knowledge so that the task-consistent score-discriminative features can be better extracted across various tasks. Extensive experiments are conducted to evaluate the contributions of proposed components. The comparisons with the existing continual learning methods additionally verify the effectiveness and versatility of our approach. Data and code are available at https://github.com/iSEE-Laboratory/Continual-AQA.

Read more

5/3/2024

Hierarchical NeuroSymbolic Approach for Comprehensive and Explainable Action Quality Assessment
Total Score

0

Hierarchical NeuroSymbolic Approach for Comprehensive and Explainable Action Quality Assessment

Lauren Okamoto, Paritosh Parmar

Action quality assessment (AQA) applies computer vision to quantitatively assess the performance or execution of a human action. Current AQA approaches are end-to-end neural models, which lack transparency and tend to be biased because they are trained on subjective human judgements as ground-truth. To address these issues, we introduce a neuro-symbolic paradigm for AQA, which uses neural networks to abstract interpretable symbols from video data and makes quality assessments by applying rules to those symbols. We take diving as the case study. We found that domain experts prefer our system and find it more informative than purely neural approaches to AQA in diving. Our system also achieves state-of-the-art action recognition and temporal segmentation, and automatically generates a detailed report that breaks the dive down into its elements and provides objective scoring with visual evidence. As verified by a group of domain experts, this report may be used to assist judges in scoring, help train judges, and provide feedback to divers. Annotated training data and code: https://github.com/laurenok24/NSAQA.

Read more

5/27/2024

Interpretable Long-term Action Quality Assessment
Total Score

0

Interpretable Long-term Action Quality Assessment

Xu Dong, Xinran Liu, Wanqing Li, Anthony Adeyemi-Ejeye, Andrew Gilbert

Long-term Action Quality Assessment (AQA) evaluates the execution of activities in videos. However, the length presents challenges in fine-grained interpretability, with current AQA methods typically producing a single score by averaging clip features, lacking detailed semantic meanings of individual clips. Long-term videos pose additional difficulty due to the complexity and diversity of actions, exacerbating interpretability challenges. While query-based transformer networks offer promising long-term modeling capabilities, their interpretability in AQA remains unsatisfactory due to a phenomenon we term Temporal Skipping, where the model skips self-attention layers to prevent output degradation. To address this, we propose an attention loss function and a query initialization method to enhance performance and interpretability. Additionally, we introduce a weight-score regression module designed to approximate the scoring patterns observed in human judgments and replace conventional single-score regression, improving the rationality of interpretability. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art results on three real-world, long-term AQA benchmarks. Our code is available at: https://github.com/dx199771/Interpretability-AQA

Read more

8/22/2024