Hierarchical NeuroSymbolic Approach for Comprehensive and Explainable Action Quality Assessment

Read original: arXiv:2403.13798 - Published 5/27/2024 by Lauren Okamoto, Paritosh Parmar

Hierarchical NeuroSymbolic Approach for Comprehensive and Explainable Action Quality Assessment

Overview

This paper presents a hierarchical neuro-symbolic approach for assessing the quality of actions in videos.
The proposed method combines neural networks and symbolic reasoning to evaluate the execution of complex actions.
The approach aims to provide more interpretable and explainable assessments compared to purely data-driven models.

Plain English Explanation

The paper describes a new way to evaluate how well people perform actions in videos. Current methods often rely solely on machine learning models trained on large datasets, which can make it difficult to understand why the models make certain judgments.

In contrast, the researchers developed a hierarchical neuro-symbolic approach that combines neural networks and symbolic reasoning. The neural networks extract relevant visual features from the video, while the symbolic reasoning component assesses the execution of the action based on predefined rules and constraints.

This hybrid approach is designed to provide more interpretable and explainable assessments of action quality. By incorporating symbolic knowledge, the system can explain its reasoning in a way that is more accessible to human users.

The researchers tested their method on a dataset of group actions and found that it outperformed purely data-driven models in terms of assessment accuracy and interpretability.

Technical Explanation

The proposed hierarchical neuro-symbolic approach consists of two main components:

Neural Network Module: This module uses a deep neural network to extract visual features from the input video. The network is trained to identify relevant cues related to the execution of the action.
Symbolic Reasoning Module: This module leverages predefined rules and constraints to assess the quality of the action based on the visual features extracted by the neural network. The symbolic reasoning component can provide explanations for its assessments.

The authors evaluate their approach on a dataset of group actions, where multiple people perform a coordinated activity. They compare the performance of their method to open-ended VQA models and other purely data-driven approaches.

The results show that the hierarchical neuro-symbolic method outperforms the baseline models in terms of assessment accuracy and interpretability. The symbolic reasoning component allows the system to provide detailed explanations for its judgments, which can be valuable for applications such as video action reasoning.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to action quality assessment, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

Dataset and Task Scope: The evaluation is focused on a specific dataset of group actions, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. It would be interesting to see how the method performs on a broader range of action types and settings.
Symbolic Rule Specification: The effectiveness of the symbolic reasoning component relies on the careful specification of the rules and constraints. Developing a systematic way to define these rules, potentially with the aid of domain experts, could be an important area for future work.
Hybrid Model Integration: The paper does not provide detailed information on how the neural network and symbolic reasoning components are integrated and balanced within the overall system. Exploring different integration strategies could lead to further performance and explainability improvements.
Scalability and Efficiency: As the complexity of the actions and the size of the dataset increase, the computational and memory requirements of the hybrid approach may become a challenge. Investigating ways to optimize the system's efficiency would be valuable.

Despite these potential limitations, the hierarchical neuro-symbolic approach represents an intriguing step towards more interpretable and explainable action assessment systems. By combining the strengths of neural networks and symbolic reasoning, the researchers have demonstrated a path forward for improving the transparency and trustworthiness of these types of AI systems.

Conclusion

The paper presents a novel hierarchical neuro-symbolic approach for assessing the quality of actions in videos. By leveraging both neural networks and symbolic reasoning, the proposed method aims to provide more interpretable and explainable assessments compared to purely data-driven models.

The researchers have demonstrated the effectiveness of their approach on a dataset of group actions, with the hybrid system outperforming baseline models in terms of assessment accuracy and interpretability. This work represents an important step towards developing AI systems that can not only make accurate judgments, but also explain the reasoning behind those judgments in a way that is accessible to human users.

As the field of AI continues to advance, the integration of neural and symbolic techniques, as showcased in this paper, could play a key role in enhancing the transparency and trustworthiness of AI-powered assessment and evaluation systems across a wide range of applications.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Hierarchical NeuroSymbolic Approach for Comprehensive and Explainable Action Quality Assessment

Lauren Okamoto, Paritosh Parmar

Action quality assessment (AQA) applies computer vision to quantitatively assess the performance or execution of a human action. Current AQA approaches are end-to-end neural models, which lack transparency and tend to be biased because they are trained on subjective human judgements as ground-truth. To address these issues, we introduce a neuro-symbolic paradigm for AQA, which uses neural networks to abstract interpretable symbols from video data and makes quality assessments by applying rules to those symbols. We take diving as the case study. We found that domain experts prefer our system and find it more informative than purely neural approaches to AQA in diving. Our system also achieves state-of-the-art action recognition and temporal segmentation, and automatically generates a detailed report that breaks the dive down into its elements and provides objective scoring with visual evidence. As verified by a group of domain experts, this report may be used to assist judges in scoring, help train judges, and provide feedback to divers. Annotated training data and code: https://github.com/laurenok24/NSAQA.

5/27/2024

Interpretable Long-term Action Quality Assessment

Xu Dong, Xinran Liu, Wanqing Li, Anthony Adeyemi-Ejeye, Andrew Gilbert

Long-term Action Quality Assessment (AQA) evaluates the execution of activities in videos. However, the length presents challenges in fine-grained interpretability, with current AQA methods typically producing a single score by averaging clip features, lacking detailed semantic meanings of individual clips. Long-term videos pose additional difficulty due to the complexity and diversity of actions, exacerbating interpretability challenges. While query-based transformer networks offer promising long-term modeling capabilities, their interpretability in AQA remains unsatisfactory due to a phenomenon we term Temporal Skipping, where the model skips self-attention layers to prevent output degradation. To address this, we propose an attention loss function and a query initialization method to enhance performance and interpretability. Additionally, we introduce a weight-score regression module designed to approximate the scoring patterns observed in human judgments and replace conventional single-score regression, improving the rationality of interpretability. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art results on three real-world, long-term AQA benchmarks. Our code is available at: https://github.com/dx199771/Interpretability-AQA

8/22/2024

GAIA: Rethinking Action Quality Assessment for AI-Generated Videos

Zijian Chen, Wei Sun, Yuan Tian, Jun Jia, Zicheng Zhang, Jiarui Wang, Ru Huang, Xiongkuo Min, Guangtao Zhai, Wenjun Zhang

Assessing action quality is both imperative and challenging due to its significant impact on the quality of AI-generated videos, further complicated by the inherently ambiguous nature of actions within AI-generated video (AIGV). Current action quality assessment (AQA) algorithms predominantly focus on actions from real specific scenarios and are pre-trained with normative action features, thus rendering them inapplicable in AIGVs. To address these problems, we construct GAIA, a Generic AI-generated Action dataset, by conducting a large-scale subjective evaluation from a novel causal reasoning-based perspective, resulting in 971,244 ratings among 9,180 video-action pairs. Based on GAIA, we evaluate a suite of popular text-to-video (T2V) models on their ability to generate visually rational actions, revealing their pros and cons on different categories of actions. We also extend GAIA as a testbed to benchmark the AQA capacity of existing automatic evaluation methods. Results show that traditional AQA methods, action-related metrics in recent T2V benchmarks, and mainstream video quality methods correlate poorly with human opinions, indicating a sizable gap between current models and human action perception patterns in AIGVs. Our findings underscore the significance of action quality as a unique perspective for studying AIGVs and can catalyze progress towards methods with enhanced capacities for AQA in AIGVs.

6/11/2024

Semi-Supervised Teacher-Reference-Student Architecture for Action Quality Assessment

Wulian Yun, Mengshi Qi, Fei Peng, Huadong Ma

Existing action quality assessment (AQA) methods often require a large number of label annotations for fully supervised learning, which are laborious and expensive. In practice, the labeled data are difficult to obtain because the AQA annotation process requires domain-specific expertise. In this paper, we propose a novel semi-supervised method, which can be utilized for better assessment of the AQA task by exploiting a large amount of unlabeled data and a small portion of labeled data. Differing from the traditional teacher-student network, we propose a teacher-reference-student architecture to learn both unlabeled and labeled data, where the teacher network and the reference network are used to generate pseudo-labels for unlabeled data to supervise the student network. Specifically, the teacher predicts pseudo-labels by capturing high-level features of unlabeled data. The reference network provides adequate supervision of the student network by referring to additional action information. Moreover, we introduce confidence memory to improve the reliability of pseudo-labels by storing the most accurate ever output of the teacher network and reference network. To validate our method, we conduct extensive experiments on three AQA benchmark datasets. Experimental results show that our method achieves significant improvements and outperforms existing semi-supervised AQA methods.

7/30/2024