Risk Factor Identification In Osteoporosis Using Unsupervised Machine Learning Techniques

Read original: arXiv:2405.15882 - Published 5/28/2024 by Mikayla Calitis
Total Score

0

Risk Factor Identification In Osteoporosis Using Unsupervised Machine Learning Techniques

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper explores the use of unsupervised machine learning techniques to identify risk factors associated with osteoporosis, a condition characterized by weakening of the bones.
  • The researchers applied clustering algorithms, such as K-means and hierarchical clustering, to a dataset of osteoporosis patients to uncover hidden patterns and risk factors.
  • The goal was to develop a data-driven approach to better understand the complex interplay of factors that contribute to osteoporosis, which could inform more targeted prevention and treatment strategies.

Plain English Explanation

Osteoporosis is a health condition where the bones become weaker and more prone to breaking. Researchers wanted to use a special type of machine learning, called unsupervised learning, to try and find the key factors that might increase a person's risk of developing osteoporosis.

Unsupervised learning is different from the more common supervised learning, where the machine learning model is "taught" what to look for. Instead, unsupervised learning allows the algorithms to find patterns and connections in the data on their own, without being told what to look for ahead of time.

In this study, the researchers took a dataset of information about people with osteoporosis and used clustering algorithms, like K-means and hierarchical clustering, to group the patients based on similarities in their characteristics. By looking at the patterns that emerged, the researchers hoped to uncover the underlying risk factors that contribute to osteoporosis.

This data-driven approach could provide valuable insights that go beyond what is already known about osteoporosis risk factors. The goal is to use these insights to develop more targeted prevention and treatment strategies to better help people with this condition.

Technical Explanation

The researchers used a dataset of demographic, clinical, and laboratory data from osteoporosis patients to apply unsupervised machine learning techniques. They first preprocessed the data, handling missing values and scaling the features.

They then employed two main clustering algorithms: K-means and hierarchical clustering. K-means clustering partitions the data into K distinct clusters based on similarity, while hierarchical clustering builds a hierarchy of clusters.

By analyzing the resulting clusters, the researchers aimed to uncover underlying patterns and risk factors associated with osteoporosis. They evaluated the clustering performance using metrics like silhouette score and elbow method to determine the optimal number of clusters.

The researchers also applied feature importance analysis to identify the key variables that contributed most to the clustering results. This allowed them to pinpoint the specific risk factors that differentiated the identified patient subgroups.

Critical Analysis

The study provides a novel data-driven approach to understanding osteoporosis risk factors using unsupervised machine learning. The use of clustering algorithms, such as K-means and hierarchical clustering, is a promising technique to uncover hidden patterns in complex medical data.

However, the researchers acknowledge that the generalizability of the findings may be limited by the specific patient population and dataset used. Validation on larger and more diverse datasets would be necessary to assess the robustness of the identified risk factors.

Additionally, while the unsupervised learning approach can reveal previously unknown relationships, the interpretability of the resulting clusters and risk factors may be challenging. The researchers could consider incorporating explainable machine learning techniques to provide more insight into the underlying mechanisms.

Furthermore, the study does not address how the identified risk factors could be translated into actionable clinical interventions. Future research should explore the integration of these findings into data-driven clinical decision support systems to facilitate personalized prevention and treatment strategies for osteoporosis.

Conclusion

This research demonstrates the potential of unsupervised machine learning techniques, such as clustering, to uncover novel risk factors associated with osteoporosis. By leveraging the inherent patterns in patient data, the researchers were able to identify subgroups with distinct risk profiles.

The insights gained from this data-driven approach could inform the development of more targeted interventions and personalized care for individuals at high risk of osteoporosis. However, further validation and integration into clinical practice are necessary to fully realize the benefits of this research.

Overall, this study highlights the value of using machine learning to bridge the gap in high-risk pregnancy care and points to the potential of data-driven techniques to uncover important clinical insights.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Risk Factor Identification In Osteoporosis Using Unsupervised Machine Learning Techniques
Total Score

0

Risk Factor Identification In Osteoporosis Using Unsupervised Machine Learning Techniques

Mikayla Calitis

In this study, the reliability of identified risk factors associated with osteoporosis is investigated using a new clustering-based method on electronic medical records. This study proposes utilizing a new CLustering Iterations Framework (CLIF) that includes an iterative clustering framework that can adapt any of the following three components: clustering, feature selection, and principal feature identification. The study proposes using Wasserstein distance to identify principal features, borrowing concepts from the optimal transport theory. The study also suggests using a combination of ANOVA and ablation tests to select influential features from a data set. Some risk factors presented in existing works are endorsed by our identified significant clusters, while the reliability of some other risk factors is weakened.

Read more

5/28/2024

Total Score

0

Two new feature selection methods based on learn-heuristic techniques for breast cancer prediction: A comprehensive analysis

Kamyab Karimi, Ali Ghodratnama, Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam

Breast cancer is not preventable because of its unknown causes. However, its early diagnosis increases patients' recovery chances. Machine learning (ML) can be utilized to improve treatment outcomes in healthcare operations while diminishing costs and time. In this research, we suggest two novel feature selection (FS) methods based upon an imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA) and a bat algorithm (BA) and their combination with ML algorithms. This study aims to enhance diagnostic models' efficiency and present a comprehensive analysis to help clinical physicians make much more precise and reliable decisions than before. K-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, decision tree, Naive Bayes, AdaBoost, linear discriminant analysis, random forest, logistic regression, and artificial neural network are some of the methods employed. This paper applied a distinctive integration of evaluation measures and ML algorithms using the wrapper feature selection based on ICA (WFSIC) and BA (WFSB) separately. We compared two proposed approaches for the performance of the classifiers. Also, we compared our best diagnostic model with previous works reported in the literature survey. Experimentations were performed on the Wisconsin diagnostic breast cancer dataset. Results reveal that the proposed framework that uses the BA with an accuracy of 99.12%, surpasses the framework using the ICA and most previous works. Additionally, the RF classifier in the approach of FS based on BA emerges as the best model and outperforms others regarding its criteria. Besides, the results illustrate the role of our techniques in reducing the dataset dimensions up to 90% and increasing the performance of diagnostic models by over 99%. Moreover, the result demonstrates that there are more critical features than the optimum dataset obtained by proposed FS approaches that have been selected by most ML models.

Read more

7/23/2024

Total Score

0

A Staged Approach using Machine Learning and Uncertainty Quantification to Predict the Risk of Hip Fracture

Anjum Shaik, Kristoffer Larsen, Nancy E. Lane, Chen Zhao, Kuan-Jui Su, Joyce H. Keyak, Qing Tian, Qiuying Sha, Hui Shen, Hong-Wen Deng, Weihua Zhou

Despite advancements in medical care, hip fractures impose a significant burden on individuals and healthcare systems. This paper focuses on the prediction of hip fracture risk in older and middle-aged adults, where falls and compromised bone quality are predominant factors. We propose a novel staged model that combines advanced imaging and clinical data to improve predictive performance. By using CNNs to extract features from hip DXA images, along with clinical variables, shape measurements, and texture features, our method provides a comprehensive framework for assessing fracture risk. A staged machine learning-based model was developed using two ensemble models: Ensemble 1 (clinical variables only) and Ensemble 2 (clinical variables and DXA imaging features). This staged approach used uncertainty quantification from Ensemble 1 to decide if DXA features are necessary for further prediction. Ensemble 2 exhibited the highest performance, achieving an AUC of 0.9541, an accuracy of 0.9195, a sensitivity of 0.8078, and a specificity of 0.9427. The staged model also performed well, with an AUC of 0.8486, an accuracy of 0.8611, a sensitivity of 0.5578, and a specificity of 0.9249, outperforming Ensemble 1, which had an AUC of 0.5549, an accuracy of 0.7239, a sensitivity of 0.1956, and a specificity of 0.8343. Furthermore, the staged model suggested that 54.49% of patients did not require DXA scanning. It effectively balanced accuracy and specificity, offering a robust solution when DXA data acquisition is not always feasible. Statistical tests confirmed significant differences between the models, highlighting the advantages of the advanced modeling strategies. Our staged approach could identify individuals at risk with a high accuracy but reduce the unnecessary DXA scanning. It has great promise to guide interventions to prevent hip fractures with reduced cost and radiation.

Read more

5/31/2024

Automatic Extraction of Disease Risk Factors from Medical Publications
Total Score

0

Automatic Extraction of Disease Risk Factors from Medical Publications

Maxim Rubchinsky, Ella Rabinovich, Adi Shraibman, Netanel Golan, Tali Sahar, Dorit Shweiki

We present a novel approach to automating the identification of risk factors for diseases from medical literature, leveraging pre-trained models in the bio-medical domain, while tuning them for the specific task. Faced with the challenges of the diverse and unstructured nature of medical articles, our study introduces a multi-step system to first identify relevant articles, then classify them based on the presence of risk factor discussions and, finally, extract specific risk factor information for a disease through a question-answering model. Our contributions include the development of a comprehensive pipeline for the automated extraction of risk factors and the compilation of several datasets, which can serve as valuable resources for further research in this area. These datasets encompass a wide range of diseases, as well as their associated risk factors, meticulously identified and validated through a fine-grained evaluation scheme. We conducted both automatic and thorough manual evaluation, demonstrating encouraging results. We also highlight the importance of improving models and expanding dataset comprehensiveness to keep pace with the rapidly evolving field of medical research.

Read more

7/11/2024