Risk-Sensitive Diffusion for Perturbation-Robust Optimization

Read original: arXiv:2402.02081 - Published 4/8/2024 by Yangming Li, Max Ruiz Luyten, Mihaela van der Schaar
Total Score

0

๐Ÿ› ๏ธ

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Score-based generative models (SGMs) optimize a model towards a score function, but noisy samples can introduce another objective function that can wrongly optimize the model.
  • This paper introduces a new setting where each noisy sample is paired with a risk vector indicating the data quality, and proposes a risk-sensitive stochastic differential equation (SDE) to minimize the negative impact of noisy samples on optimization.
  • The authors prove that zero instability is only possible with Gaussian perturbation, and provide optimal coefficients for non-Gaussian cases to minimize the misguidance of noisy samples.
  • The paper extends diffusion models to risk-sensitive versions and derives a risk-free loss for efficient computation, and presents numerical experiments to validate the theory.

Plain English Explanation

Score-based generative models LINK are a type of machine learning model that try to optimize towards a "score function" - a measure of how good the generated samples are. However, the authors of this paper show that when the data samples used to train these models are noisy (i.e., contain errors or inaccuracies), it can actually lead the model to optimize towards the wrong objective, rather than the intended score function.

To address this problem, the researchers propose a new approach where each noisy data sample is paired with a "risk vector" - a measure of how much noise or error is in that particular sample. They then introduce a new type of mathematical model called a "risk-sensitive SDE" that can take this risk information into account and try to minimize the negative impact of the noisy samples on the optimization process.

Specifically, the authors prove that if the noise in the samples is caused by a normal (Gaussian) distribution, then it's possible to completely eliminate the negative effects. For other types of noise distributions, they provide the optimal mathematical parameters to minimize the mistaken optimization caused by the noisy data.

To put this into practice, the researchers extend a popular type of generative model called diffusion models to incorporate this risk-sensitive approach. They also develop a more efficient way to train these models that avoids the issues caused by noisy data. Finally, they conduct experiments to confirm that their theoretical results hold up in real-world applications.

Technical Explanation

The core idea of score-based generative models (SGMs) LINK is to optimize a model's parameters towards a score function that measures the quality of the generated samples. However, the authors show that when the training data contains noisy samples, it can lead the model to optimize towards a different, unintended objective function, rather than the desired score function.

To address this issue, the researchers introduce a new setting where each noisy data sample is accompanied by a "risk vector" that indicates the level of noise or error in that particular sample. They then propose a novel type of stochastic differential equation (SDE) called "risk-sensitive SDE" that can incorporate this risk information to minimize the negative impact of noisy samples on the optimization process.

Theoretically, the authors prove that if the noise in the samples follows a Gaussian (normal) distribution, then it is possible to achieve a "zero instability" measure, meaning the noisy samples have no detrimental effect on the optimization. For non-Gaussian noise distributions, they derive the optimal coefficients for the risk-sensitive SDE that can minimize the misguidance caused by the noisy samples.

To apply this risk-sensitive approach in practice, the researchers extend the popular diffusion models LINK to their "risk-sensitive" versions and develop a "risk-free" loss function that is computationally efficient to optimize. They also conduct numerical experiments LINK to validate their theoretical results and demonstrate the robustness of their approach to noisy samples.

Critical Analysis

The paper addresses an important issue in score-based generative models, where noisy training data can lead to suboptimal model optimization. The proposed risk-sensitive SDE approach provides a principled way to mitigate this problem, with strong theoretical guarantees for the Gaussian noise case and practical solutions for non-Gaussian noise.

One potential limitation is that the assumption of having access to a "risk vector" for each data sample may not always be realistic in real-world applications. The authors mention that this setting is common in medical and sensor data, but it may be more challenging to obtain such precise quality metadata for other types of data.

Additionally, while the paper derives the optimal coefficients for the risk-sensitive SDE in the non-Gaussian case, it's unclear how sensitive the performance is to the accuracy of these coefficients in practice. Further research LINK could explore the robustness of the approach to imperfect estimates of the risk parameters.

Overall, the paper presents a well-designed and theoretically grounded solution to a relevant problem in the field of generative modeling. The risk-sensitive SDE concept and its practical implementation in diffusion models are valuable contributions that could inspire further research in this direction.

Conclusion

This paper tackles the issue of noisy training data negatively impacting the optimization of score-based generative models. By introducing a risk-sensitive SDE framework that incorporates per-sample risk information, the authors demonstrate how to mitigate the detrimental effects of noisy samples and achieve robust optimization towards the desired score function.

The theoretical guarantees for the Gaussian noise case and the practical solutions for non-Gaussian noise make this a significant advancement in the field of generative modeling. The risk-sensitive extensions of diffusion models and the efficient risk-free loss function provide a pathway for applying these ideas in real-world applications.

While the reliance on risk vector metadata may be a limitation in some scenarios, the core concepts presented in this paper open up new research directions in developing more resilient and reliable generative models. As the use of these models continues to grow, ensuring their robustness to noisy data will be crucial for their widespread adoption and impact.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on ๐• โ†’

Related Papers

๐Ÿ› ๏ธ

Total Score

0

Risk-Sensitive Diffusion for Perturbation-Robust Optimization

Yangming Li, Max Ruiz Luyten, Mihaela van der Schaar

The essence of score-based generative models (SGM) is to optimize a score-based model towards the score function. However, we show that noisy samples incur another objective function, rather than the one with score function, which will wrongly optimize the model. To address this problem, we first consider a new setting where every noisy sample is paired with a risk vector, indicating the data quality (e.g., noise level). This setting is very common in real-world applications, especially for medical and sensor data. Then, we introduce risk-sensitive SDE, a type of stochastic differential equation (SDE) parameterized by the risk vector. With this tool, we aim to minimize a measure called perturbation instability, which we define to quantify the negative impact of noisy samples on optimization. We will prove that zero instability measure is only achievable in the case where noisy samples are caused by Gaussian perturbation. For non-Gaussian cases, we will also provide its optimal coefficients that minimize the misguidance of noisy samples. To apply risk-sensitive SDE in practice, we extend widely used diffusion models to their risk-sensitive versions and derive a risk-free loss that is efficient for computation. We also have conducted numerical experiments to confirm the validity of our theorems and show that they let SGM be robust to noisy samples for optimization.

Read more

4/8/2024

๐Ÿ‘€

Total Score

0

A Geometric Perspective on Diffusion Models

Defang Chen, Zhenyu Zhou, Jian-Ping Mei, Chunhua Shen, Chun Chen, Can Wang

Recent years have witnessed significant progress in developing effective training and fast sampling techniques for diffusion models. A remarkable advancement is the use of stochastic differential equations (SDEs) and their marginal-preserving ordinary differential equations (ODEs) to describe data perturbation and generative modeling in a unified framework. In this paper, we carefully inspect the ODE-based sampling of a popular variance-exploding SDE and reveal several intriguing structures of its sampling dynamics. We discover that the data distribution and the noise distribution are smoothly connected with a quasi-linear sampling trajectory and another implicit denoising trajectory that even converges faster. Meanwhile, the denoising trajectory governs the curvature of the corresponding sampling trajectory and its finite differences yield various second-order samplers used in practice. Furthermore, we establish a theoretical relationship between the optimal ODE-based sampling and the classic mean-shift (mode-seeking) algorithm, with which we can characterize the asymptotic behavior of diffusion models and identify the empirical score deviation. Code is available at url{https://github.com/zju-pi/diff-sampler}.

Read more

8/26/2024

๐Ÿงช

Total Score

0

Score-based Diffusion Models via Stochastic Differential Equations -- a Technical Tutorial

Wenpin Tang, Hanyang Zhao

This is an expository article on the score-based diffusion models, with a particular focus on the formulation via stochastic differential equations (SDE). After a gentle introduction, we discuss the two pillars in the diffusion modeling -- sampling and score matching, which encompass the SDE/ODE sampling, score matching efficiency, the consistency models, and reinforcement learning. Short proofs are given to illustrate the main idea of the stated results. The article is primarily a technical introduction to the field, and practitioners may also find some analysis useful in designing new models or algorithms.

Read more

6/26/2024

๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿซ

Total Score

0

Score-based generative models are provably robust: an uncertainty quantification perspective

Nikiforos Mimikos-Stamatopoulos, Benjamin J. Zhang, Markos A. Katsoulakis

Through an uncertainty quantification (UQ) perspective, we show that score-based generative models (SGMs) are provably robust to the multiple sources of error in practical implementation. Our primary tool is the Wasserstein uncertainty propagation (WUP) theorem, a model-form UQ bound that describes how the $L^2$ error from learning the score function propagates to a Wasserstein-1 ($mathbf{d}_1$) ball around the true data distribution under the evolution of the Fokker-Planck equation. We show how errors due to (a) finite sample approximation, (b) early stopping, (c) score-matching objective choice, (d) score function parametrization expressiveness, and (e) reference distribution choice, impact the quality of the generative model in terms of a $mathbf{d}_1$ bound of computable quantities. The WUP theorem relies on Bernstein estimates for Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman partial differential equations (PDE) and the regularizing properties of diffusion processes. Specifically, PDE regularity theory shows that stochasticity is the key mechanism ensuring SGM algorithms are provably robust. The WUP theorem applies to integral probability metrics beyond $mathbf{d}_1$, such as the total variation distance and the maximum mean discrepancy. Sample complexity and generalization bounds in $mathbf{d}_1$ follow directly from the WUP theorem. Our approach requires minimal assumptions, is agnostic to the manifold hypothesis and avoids absolute continuity assumptions for the target distribution. Additionally, our results clarify the trade-offs among multiple error sources in SGMs.

Read more

5/27/2024