Fed-Credit: Robust Federated Learning with Credibility Management
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a novel federated learning (FL) system called Fed-Credit that aims to improve the robustness of FL against potential attacks, such as data poisoning.
- Fed-Credit introduces a "credibility management" mechanism to evaluate the trustworthiness of client updates and selectively aggregate them during the FL process.
- The goal is to enhance the privacy preservation and security of federated learning in the face of malicious clients or non-IID data distributions.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new system called Fed-Credit that aims to make federated learning more robust and secure. Federated learning is a way of training AI models without needing to gather all the training data in one place, which can help protect people's privacy. However, federated learning systems can be vulnerable to attacks where malicious clients try to sabotage the training process.
Fed-Credit addresses this by evaluating how trustworthy each client's contributions are during the training process. It has a "credibility management" mechanism that checks if a client's updates are legitimate before incorporating them into the model. This helps defend against attacks like data poisoning, where clients try to sneak in bad data to corrupt the model.
The goal is to make federated learning more secure and private, even when dealing with untrustworthy clients or data that is not evenly distributed across clients (known as non-IID data).
Technical Explanation
The Fed-Credit system works by having a central server that coordinates the federated learning process. During each training round, clients send their local model updates to the server. Fed-Credit then evaluates the "credibility" of each client's update before aggregating them into the global model.
The credibility evaluation is based on a few key factors:
- Data Quality: The server checks if the client's training data aligns with the global data distribution, to detect data poisoning attempts.
- Update Consistency: The server compares each client's update with the historical updates from that client to identify suspicious deviations.
- Contribution Importance: The server assigns higher weights to clients whose updates contribute more significantly to improving the global model.
By selectively aggregating the credible updates, Fed-Credit is able to mitigate the impact of malicious or unreliable clients and improve the overall robustness of the federated learning process.
The paper also explores techniques to preserve the privacy of edge devices in the federated learning setting, such as differential privacy and secure multi-party computation.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to enhancing the robustness of federated learning systems. The credibility management mechanism seems well-designed to detect and mitigate various types of attacks, such as data poisoning.
However, the authors acknowledge that Fed-Credit may introduce some computational and communication overhead, which could limit its practical applicability, especially for resource-constrained edge devices. Further research is needed to optimize the efficiency of the credibility evaluation process.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential privacy implications of the credibility management mechanism. While the proposed privacy-preserving techniques are promising, there may be concerns about the server's ability to infer sensitive information about clients' data distributions or model updates.
Overall, Fed-Credit represents a valuable contribution to the field of secure and private federated learning. The authors have identified an important challenge and proposed an innovative solution, but more work is needed to address the practical and privacy-related limitations.
Conclusion
The Fed-Credit system introduced in this paper is a significant step forward in enhancing the robustness of federated learning against various attacks and malicious behaviors. By implementing a credibility management mechanism, Fed-Credit is able to selectively aggregate client updates, improving the overall security and privacy of the federated learning process.
While the paper highlights some potential drawbacks and areas for further research, the core ideas behind Fed-Credit have the potential to make federated learning a more reliable and trustworthy paradigm for training AI models in a distributed and privacy-preserving manner. As the use of federated learning continues to grow, solutions like Fed-Credit will become increasingly important for ensuring the integrity and security of these systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Fed-Credit: Robust Federated Learning with Credibility Management
Jiayan Chen, Zhirong Qian, Tianhui Meng, Xitong Gao, Tian Wang, Weijia Jia
Aiming at privacy preservation, Federated Learning (FL) is an emerging machine learning approach enabling model training on decentralized devices or data sources. The learning mechanism of FL relies on aggregating parameter updates from individual clients. However, this process may pose a potential security risk due to the presence of malicious devices. Existing solutions are either costly due to the use of compute-intensive technology, or restrictive for reasons of strong assumptions such as the prior knowledge of the number of attackers and how they attack. Few methods consider both privacy constraints and uncertain attack scenarios. In this paper, we propose a robust FL approach based on the credibility management scheme, called Fed-Credit. Unlike previous studies, our approach does not require prior knowledge of the nodes and the data distribution. It maintains and employs a credibility set, which weighs the historical clients' contributions based on the similarity between the local models and global model, to adjust the global model update. The subtlety of Fed-Credit is that the time decay and attitudinal value factor are incorporated into the dynamic adjustment of the reputation weights and it boasts a computational complexity of O(n) (n is the number of the clients). We conducted extensive experiments on the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets under 5 types of attacks. The results exhibit superior accuracy and resilience against adversarial attacks, all while maintaining comparatively low computational complexity. Among these, on the Non-IID CIFAR-10 dataset, our algorithm exhibited performance enhancements of 19.5% and 14.5%, respectively, in comparison to the state-of-the-art algorithm when dealing with two types of data poisoning attacks.
Read more5/21/2024
🔎
0
Mitigating Malicious Attacks in Federated Learning via Confidence-aware Defense
Qilei Li, Ahmed M. Abdelmoniem
Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning diagram that enables multiple clients to collaboratively train a global model without sharing their private local data. However, FL systems are vulnerable to attacks that are happening in malicious clients through data poisoning and model poisoning, which can deteriorate the performance of aggregated global model. Existing defense methods typically focus on mitigating specific types of poisoning and are often ineffective against unseen types of attack. These methods also assume an attack happened moderately while is not always holds true in real. Consequently, these methods can significantly fail in terms of accuracy and robustness when detecting and addressing updates from attacked malicious clients. To overcome these challenges, in this work, we propose a simple yet effective framework to detect malicious clients, namely Confidence-Aware Defense (CAD), that utilizes the confidence scores of local models as criteria to evaluate the reliability of local updates. Our key insight is that malicious attacks, regardless of attack type, will cause the model to deviate from its previous state, thus leading to increased uncertainty when making predictions. Therefore, CAD is comprehensively effective for both model poisoning and data poisoning attacks by accurately identifying and mitigating potential malicious updates, even under varying degrees of attacks and data heterogeneity. Experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly enhances the robustness of FL systems against various types of attacks across various scenarios by achieving higher model accuracy and stability.
Read more8/20/2024
0
MultiConfederated Learning: Inclusive Non-IID Data handling with Decentralized Federated Learning
Michael Duchesne, Kaiwen Zhang, Chamseddine Talhi
Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a prominent privacy-preserving technique for enabling use cases like confidential clinical machine learning. FL operates by aggregating models trained by remote devices which owns the data. Thus, FL enables the training of powerful global models using crowd-sourced data from a large number of learners, without compromising their privacy. However, the aggregating server is a single point of failure when generating the global model. Moreover, the performance of the model suffers when the data is not independent and identically distributed (non-IID data) on all remote devices. This leads to vastly different models being aggregated, which can reduce the performance by as much as 50% in certain scenarios. In this paper, we seek to address the aforementioned issues while retaining the benefits of FL. We propose MultiConfederated Learning: a decentralized FL framework which is designed to handle non-IID data. Unlike traditional FL, MultiConfederated Learning will maintain multiple models in parallel (instead of a single global model) to help with convergence when the data is non-IID. With the help of transfer learning, learners can converge to fewer models. In order to increase adaptability, learners are allowed to choose which updates to aggregate from their peers.
Read more4/23/2024
0
Federated Learning: A Cutting-Edge Survey of the Latest Advancements and Applications
Azim Akhtarshenas, Mohammad Ali Vahedifar, Navid Ayoobi, Behrouz Maham, Tohid Alizadeh, Sina Ebrahimi, David L'opez-P'erez
Robust machine learning (ML) models can be developed by leveraging large volumes of data and distributing the computational tasks across numerous devices or servers. Federated learning (FL) is a technique in the realm of ML that facilitates this goal by utilizing cloud infrastructure to enable collaborative model training among a network of decentralized devices. Beyond distributing the computational load, FL targets the resolution of privacy issues and the reduction of communication costs simultaneously. To protect user privacy, FL requires users to send model updates rather than transmitting large quantities of raw and potentially confidential data. Specifically, individuals train ML models locally using their own data and then upload the results in the form of weights and gradients to the cloud for aggregation into the global model. This strategy is also advantageous in environments with limited bandwidth or high communication costs, as it prevents the transmission of large data volumes. With the increasing volume of data and rising privacy concerns, alongside the emergence of large-scale ML models like Large Language Models (LLMs), FL presents itself as a timely and relevant solution. It is therefore essential to review current FL algorithms to guide future research that meets the rapidly evolving ML demands. This survey provides a comprehensive analysis and comparison of the most recent FL algorithms, evaluating them on various fronts including mathematical frameworks, privacy protection, resource allocation, and applications. Beyond summarizing existing FL methods, this survey identifies potential gaps, open areas, and future challenges based on the performance reports and algorithms used in recent studies. This survey enables researchers to readily identify existing limitations in the FL field for further exploration.
Read more5/28/2024