Robust personnel rostering: how accurate should absenteeism predictions be?
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the role of absenteeism prediction accuracy in creating robust personnel rostering systems.
- It investigates how accurate absenteeism predictions need to be to enable effective personnel scheduling that can withstand unexpected absences.
- The research aims to provide guidance on the necessary prediction accuracy for building reliable personnel rostering solutions.
Plain English Explanation
Scheduling employees, or "personnel rostering," is a common challenge for many organizations. When employees are unexpectedly absent, it can disrupt the plans and cause problems. This paper looks at how accurate the predictions of employee absences need to be in order to create a robust personnel rostering system that can handle unexpected absences.
The researchers wanted to understand the tradeoffs between the accuracy of absence predictions and the effectiveness of the personnel schedules. They investigated how accurate the absence predictions need to be to create schedules that can still function well even when some employees are unexpectedly absent.
By understanding this, the researchers hope to provide guidance on the level of prediction accuracy that is required to build reliable personnel rostering solutions that can adapt to unexpected changes.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines the relationship between absenteeism prediction accuracy and the effectiveness of personnel rostering systems. It builds on prior research in the area of robust prediction under missingness shifts and enhancing uncertain demand prediction in hospitals using simple models.
The authors propose a model-based approach to personnel rostering that can incorporate varying levels of absenteeism prediction accuracy. They evaluate the performance of this approach under different scenarios of prediction error, drawing comparisons to non-clairvoyant scheduling with partial predictions and online resource allocation strategies.
Through computational experiments, the researchers investigate the tradeoffs between absenteeism prediction accuracy and the quality of the resulting personnel schedules. They analyze how prediction errors of different magnitudes impact key performance metrics such as staffing costs, service levels, and employee workload.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful analysis of the practical implications of absenteeism prediction accuracy for personnel rostering. By considering varying degrees of prediction error, the authors offer valuable insights into the necessary level of predictive performance required to build effective and resilient scheduling systems.
One limitation mentioned in the paper is the need to validate the findings across a wider range of organizational contexts and settings. The experiments were conducted using synthetic data, so testing the approach with real-world employee absenteeism data would help strengthen the generalizability of the results.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential biases or fairness concerns that could arise from relying on absenteeism prediction models. As with any predictive system, there is a risk of perpetuating or exacerbating existing inequities in the workforce. Further research could explore ways to mitigate these issues.
Conclusion
This paper makes an important contribution to the field of personnel rostering by investigating the role of absenteeism prediction accuracy. By providing guidance on the necessary level of predictive performance, the research can inform the design of more robust and adaptable scheduling systems.
As organizations continue to grapple with the challenges of employee absences, this work offers a useful framework for balancing the tradeoffs between prediction quality and scheduling effectiveness. The insights from this study can help organizations build personnel rostering solutions that are better equipped to handle unexpected disruptions and maintain high levels of service and efficiency.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Robust personnel rostering: how accurate should absenteeism predictions be?
Martina Doneda, Pieter Smet, Giuliana Carello, Ettore Lanzarone, Greet Vanden Berghe
Disruptions to personnel rosters caused by absenteeism often necessitate last-minute adjustments to the employees' working hours. A common strategy to mitigate the impact of such changes is to assign employees to reserve shifts: special on-call duties during which an employee can be called in to cover for an absent employee. To maximize roster robustness, we assume a predict-then-optimize approach that uses absence predictions from a machine learning model to schedule an adequate number of reserve shifts. In this paper we propose a methodology to evaluate the robustness of rosters generated by the predict-then-optimize approach, assuming the machine learning model will make predictions at a predetermined prediction performance level. Instead of training and testing machine learning models, our methodology simulates the predictions based on a characterization of model performance. We show how this methodology can be applied to identify the minimum performance level needed for the model to outperform simple non-data-driven robust rostering policies. In a computational study on a nurse rostering problem, we demonstrate how the predict-then-optimize approach outperforms non-data-driven policies under reasonable performance requirements, particularly when employees possess interchangeable skills.
Read more6/27/2024
0
Non-clairvoyant Scheduling with Partial Predictions
Ziyad Benomar, Vianney Perchet
The non-clairvoyant scheduling problem has gained new interest within learning-augmented algorithms, where the decision-maker is equipped with predictions without any quality guarantees. In practical settings, access to predictions may be reduced to specific instances, due to cost or data limitations. Our investigation focuses on scenarios where predictions for only $B$ job sizes out of $n$ are available to the algorithm. We first establish near-optimal lower bounds and algorithms in the case of perfect predictions. Subsequently, we present a learning-augmented algorithm satisfying the robustness, consistency, and smoothness criteria, and revealing a novel tradeoff between consistency and smoothness inherent in the scenario with a restricted number of predictions.
Read more5/3/2024
🎯
0
Optimizing Nurse Scheduling: A Supply Chain Approach for Healthcare Institutions
Jubin Thomas
When managing an organization, planners often encounter numerous challenging scenarios. In such instances, relying solely on intuition or managerial experience may not suffice, necessitating a quantitative approach. This demand is further accentuated in the era of big data, where the sheer scale and complexity of constraints pose significant challenges. Therefore, the aim of this study is to provide a foundational framework for addressing personnel scheduling, a critical issue in organizational management. Specifically, we focus on optimizing shift assignments for staff, a task fraught with complexities due to factors such as contractual obligations and mandated rest periods. Moreover, the current landscape is characterized by frequent employee shortages across various industries, with many organizations lacking efficient and dependable management tools to address them. Therefore, our attention is particularly drawn to the nurse rostering problem, a personnel scheduling challenge prevalent in healthcare settings. These issues are characterized by a multitude of variables, given that a single healthcare facility may employ hundreds of nurses, alongside stringent constraints such as the need for adequate staffing levels and rest periods postnight shifts. Furthermore, the ongoing COVID19 pandemic has exacerbated staffing challenges in healthcare institutions, underlining the importance of accurately assessing staffing needs and optimizing shift allocations for effective operation amidst crisis situations.
Read more7/17/2024
0
Best of Many in Both Worlds: Online Resource Allocation with Predictions under Unknown Arrival Model
Lin An, Andrew A. Li, Benjamin Moseley, Gabriel Visotsky
Online decision-makers often obtain predictions on future variables, such as arrivals, demands, inventories, and so on. These predictions can be generated from simple forecasting algorithms for univariate time-series, all the way to state-of-the-art machine learning models that leverage multiple time-series and additional feature information. However, the prediction accuracy is unknown to decision-makers a priori, hence blindly following the predictions can be harmful. In this paper, we address this problem by developing algorithms that utilize predictions in a manner that is robust to the unknown prediction accuracy. We consider the Online Resource Allocation Problem, a generic model for online decision-making, in which a limited amount of resources may be used to satisfy a sequence of arriving requests. Prior work has characterized the best achievable performances when the arrivals are either generated stochastically (i.i.d.) or completely adversarially, and shown that algorithms exist which match these bounds under both arrival models, without ``knowing'' the underlying model. To this backdrop, we introduce predictions in the form of shadow prices on each type of resource. Prediction accuracy is naturally defined to be the distance between the predictions and the actual shadow prices. We tightly characterize, via a formal lower bound, the extent to which any algorithm can optimally leverage predictions (that is, to ``follow'' the predictions when accurate, and ``ignore'' them when inaccurate) without knowing the prediction accuracy or the underlying arrival model. Our main contribution is then an algorithm which achieves this lower bound. Finally, we empirically validate our algorithm with a large-scale experiment on real data from the retailer H&M.
Read more6/26/2024