On the Role of Context in Reading Time Prediction

Read original: arXiv:2409.08160 - Published 9/14/2024 by Andreas Opedal, Eleanor Chodroff, Ryan Cotterell, Ethan Gotlieb Wilcox

On the Role of Context in Reading Time Prediction

Overview

This paper explores the role of context in predicting reading time, a key metric for understanding human language processing.
The researchers investigated how well different models can predict reading times based on the current word, its linguistic properties, and the broader context.
They found that models accounting for context outperformed those focused only on the current word, highlighting the importance of considering the surrounding information when modeling reading behavior.

Plain English Explanation

When we read, our eyes don't just focus on one word at a time. The context - the words and information around the current word - also plays a big role in how long we spend reading that word. This paper looked at different models that try to predict how long a person will spend reading a word, based on factors like the word itself, its linguistic properties, and the surrounding context.

The researchers found that models which took the broader context into account were better at predicting reading times than models that only looked at the current word. This suggests that context is really important for understanding how people process language. It's not just about the individual words, but how they fit together and the information they provide.

By better understanding the role of context in reading, this research could help improve language models and our ability to predict and analyze human language processing. This has applications in areas like machine reading comprehension, text summarization, and assistive technologies.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the role of context in predicting reading time, which is a key metric for understanding human language processing. The researchers compared the performance of different models in predicting reading times, with some models focused solely on the current word and its linguistic features, while others also incorporated broader contextual information.

The experimental setup involved collecting eye-tracking data from human participants as they read various texts. The researchers then trained different models to predict the reading time for each word, using features like word length, frequency, surprisal (how unexpected the word is), and contextual information such as the semantic and syntactic properties of the surrounding words.

The results showed that models which accounted for contextual information outperformed those that only considered the current word. This highlights the importance of considering the broader linguistic context when modeling human reading behavior, as readers seem to integrate information from the surrounding words and sentences to guide their processing of the current word.

The paper provides valuable insights into the cognitive processes underlying language comprehension, and the findings have implications for the development of more accurate language models and natural language processing applications.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed study and a thorough analysis of the role of context in reading time prediction. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

The study was conducted in English, and it would be interesting to see if the findings generalize to other languages with different linguistic properties.
The models used in the study were relatively simple and did not incorporate more advanced contextual features or neural architectures. Exploring more sophisticated models could provide additional insights.
The paper does not delve into the specific cognitive mechanisms underlying the role of context in reading time. Further research could investigate the neurocognitive processes involved in integrating contextual information during language comprehension.

Overall, this study makes a valuable contribution to our understanding of how context shapes human reading behavior, and it provides a solid foundation for future research in this area.

Conclusion

This paper highlights the important role of context in predicting reading time, a key metric for understanding human language processing. The researchers found that models accounting for contextual information outperformed those focused solely on the current word, underscoring the need to consider the broader linguistic context when modeling reading behavior.

These findings have implications for the development of more accurate language models and natural language processing applications, as they suggest that incorporating contextual cues can lead to better predictions of how people read and comprehend text. Further research in this area could provide deeper insights into the cognitive mechanisms underlying language processing and help advance our understanding of human cognition.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

On the Role of Context in Reading Time Prediction

Andreas Opedal, Eleanor Chodroff, Ryan Cotterell, Ethan Gotlieb Wilcox

We present a new perspective on how readers integrate context during real-time language comprehension. Our proposals build on surprisal theory, which posits that the processing effort of a linguistic unit (e.g., a word) is an affine function of its in-context information content. We first observe that surprisal is only one out of many potential ways that a contextual predictor can be derived from a language model. Another one is the pointwise mutual information (PMI) between a unit and its context, which turns out to yield the same predictive power as surprisal when controlling for unigram frequency. Moreover, both PMI and surprisal are correlated with frequency. This means that neither PMI nor surprisal contains information about context alone. In response to this, we propose a technique where we project surprisal onto the orthogonal complement of frequency, yielding a new contextual predictor that is uncorrelated with frequency. Our experiments show that the proportion of variance in reading times explained by context is a lot smaller when context is represented by the orthogonalized predictor. From an interpretability standpoint, this indicates that previous studies may have overstated the role that context has in predicting reading times.

9/14/2024

Testing the Predictions of Surprisal Theory in 11 Languages

Ethan Gotlieb Wilcox, Tiago Pimentel, Clara Meister, Ryan Cotterell, Roger P. Levy

A fundamental result in psycholinguistics is that less predictable words take a longer time to process. One theoretical explanation for this finding is Surprisal Theory (Hale, 2001; Levy, 2008), which quantifies a word's predictability as its surprisal, i.e. its negative log-probability given a context. While evidence supporting the predictions of Surprisal Theory have been replicated widely, most have focused on a very narrow slice of data: native English speakers reading English texts. Indeed, no comprehensive multilingual analysis exists. We address this gap in the current literature by investigating the relationship between surprisal and reading times in eleven different languages, distributed across five language families. Deriving estimates from language models trained on monolingual and multilingual corpora, we test three predictions associated with surprisal theory: (i) whether surprisal is predictive of reading times; (ii) whether expected surprisal, i.e. contextual entropy, is predictive of reading times; (iii) and whether the linking function between surprisal and reading times is linear. We find that all three predictions are borne out crosslinguistically. By focusing on a more diverse set of languages, we argue that these results offer the most robust link to-date between information theory and incremental language processing across languages.

9/12/2024

Language models emulate certain cognitive profiles: An investigation of how predictability measures interact with individual differences

Patrick Haller, Lena S. Bolliger, Lena A. Jager

To date, most investigations on surprisal and entropy effects in reading have been conducted on the group level, disregarding individual differences. In this work, we revisit the predictive power of surprisal and entropy measures estimated from a range of language models (LMs) on data of human reading times as a measure of processing effort by incorporating information of language users' cognitive capacities. To do so, we assess the predictive power of surprisal and entropy estimated from generative LMs on reading data obtained from individuals who also completed a wide range of psychometric tests. Specifically, we investigate if modulating surprisal and entropy relative to cognitive scores increases prediction accuracy of reading times, and we examine whether LMs exhibit systematic biases in the prediction of reading times for cognitively high- or low-performing groups, revealing what type of psycholinguistic subject a given LM emulates. Our study finds that in most cases, incorporating cognitive capacities increases predictive power of surprisal and entropy on reading times, and that generally, high performance in the psychometric tests is associated with lower sensitivity to predictability effects. Finally, our results suggest that the analyzed LMs emulate readers with lower verbal intelligence, suggesting that for a given target group (i.e., individuals with high verbal intelligence), these LMs provide less accurate predictability estimates.

8/6/2024

🤷

Temperature-scaling surprisal estimates improve fit to human reading times -- but does it do so for the right reasons?

Tong Liu, Iza v{S}krjanec, Vera Demberg

A wide body of evidence shows that human language processing difficulty is predicted by the information-theoretic measure surprisal, a word's negative log probability in context. However, it is still unclear how to best estimate these probabilities needed for predicting human processing difficulty -- while a long-standing belief held that models with lower perplexity would provide more accurate estimates of word predictability, and therefore lead to better reading time predictions, recent work has shown that for very large models, psycholinguistic predictive power decreases. One reason could be that language models might be more confident of their predictions than humans, because they have had exposure to several magnitudes more data. In this paper, we test what effect temperature-scaling of large language model (LLM) predictions has on surprisal estimates and their predictive power of reading times of English texts. Firstly, we show that calibration of large language models typically improves with model size, i.e. poorer calibration cannot account for poorer fit to reading times. Secondly, we find that temperature-scaling probabilities lead to a systematically better fit to reading times (up to 89% improvement in delta log likelihood), across several reading time corpora. Finally, we show that this improvement in fit is chiefly driven by words that are composed of multiple subword tokens.

7/4/2024