Context Matters: An Empirical Study of the Impact of Contextual Information in Temporal Question Answering Systems
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the impact of contextual information on the performance of temporal question answering systems.
- The researchers conducted empirical studies to understand how different types of context, such as the article's content or language model knowledge, affect a system's ability to answer questions about time-related events.
- The findings have implications for the design and evaluation of question answering systems, particularly those dealing with temporal information.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how the surrounding information, or context, affects the performance of systems that answer questions about when things happened. For example, if you ask a system "When did the French Revolution start?", the system might do better if it also has information about the historical events and time period related to the French Revolution, rather than just the question text alone.
The researchers conducted experiments to test different types of context, such as the content of the passage the question is based on, or the general knowledge a language model has learned. They found that including relevant context information can significantly improve a system's ability to answer temporal questions accurately.
This is important because many real-world question answering applications, like virtual assistants or search engines, need to handle questions involving dates, times, and other temporal information. Understanding how context affects performance can help design better systems for these types of questions.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents an empirical study on the impact of contextual information in temporal question answering systems. The researchers designed experiments to evaluate system performance under different context conditions, including:
- Passage Context: Providing the full passage or document that the question is based on, rather than just the question text.
- Language Model Context: Leveraging the general world knowledge encoded in large language models, in addition to the specific question and passage.
The experiments used multiple benchmark datasets for temporal question answering, and the researchers compared model performance with and without the different types of context.
The results showed that incorporating relevant contextual information, from either the passage content or language model knowledge, can significantly improve a system's ability to answer temporal questions accurately. The magnitude of the performance gains depended on factors like the complexity of the question and the quality of the contextual information.
The paper discusses the implications of these findings for the design and evaluation of question answering systems, particularly those dealing with temporal information. The researchers highlight the importance of considering contextual factors when benchmarking system performance and note that standard evaluation protocols may not fully capture the real-world relevance of these systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful and well-designed empirical study on the impact of context in temporal question answering. The researchers carefully considered different types of contextual information and their effects on system performance, which is an important step in understanding the capabilities and limitations of these systems.
One potential limitation of the study is the use of existing benchmark datasets, which may not fully capture the range of real-world temporal questions and contexts that systems would need to handle. The researchers acknowledge this and suggest that future work could explore more diverse and naturalistic data sources.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific mechanisms by which different types of context improve performance. Further analysis of the model behaviors and error patterns could provide additional insights into the underlying reasons for the observed performance gains.
While the paper makes a strong case for the importance of considering context in temporal question answering, it would be valuable to see the researchers extend their work to explore other contextual factors, such as the broader conversational or task-oriented context in which these questions might arise.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive empirical study on the impact of contextual information in temporal question answering systems. The findings demonstrate that incorporating relevant context, from both the passage content and the language model's background knowledge, can significantly improve a system's ability to answer questions about time-related events and facts.
These insights have important implications for the design and evaluation of question answering systems, particularly those targeting real-world applications that involve temporal information. By accounting for the role of context, researchers and practitioners can develop more robust and effective systems that can better support users' information needs.
The paper's contributions highlight the importance of considering the broader context in which questions are asked, rather than focusing solely on the question text itself. As the field of question answering continues to evolve, this work provides a valuable foundation for further exploration and innovation in this critical area of natural language processing.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Context Matters: An Empirical Study of the Impact of Contextual Information in Temporal Question Answering Systems
Dan Schumacher, Fatemeh Haji, Tara Grey, Niharika Bandlamudi, Nupoor Karnik, Gagana Uday Kumar, Jason Cho-Yu Chiang, Paul Rad, Nishant Vishwamitra, Anthony Rios
Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with temporal reasoning, crucial for tasks like historical event analysis and time-sensitive information retrieval. Despite advancements, state-of-the-art models falter in handling temporal information, especially when faced with irrelevant or noisy contexts. This paper addresses this gap by empirically examining the robustness of temporal question-answering (TQA) systems trained on various context types, including relevant, irrelevant, slightly altered, and no context. Our findings indicate that training with a mix of these contexts enhances model robustness and accuracy. Additionally, we show that the position of context relative to the question significantly impacts performance, with question-first positioning yielding better results. We introduce two new context-rich TQA datasets, ContextAQA and ContextTQE, and provide comprehensive evaluations and guidelines for training robust TQA models. Our work lays the foundation for developing reliable and context-aware temporal QA systems, with broader implications for enhancing LLM robustness against diverse and potentially adversarial information.
Read more7/1/2024
0
Enhancing Temporal Sensitivity and Reasoning for Time-Sensitive Question Answering
Wanqi Yang, Yanda Li, Meng Fang, Ling Chen
Time-Sensitive Question Answering (TSQA) demands the effective utilization of specific temporal contexts, encompassing multiple time-evolving facts, to address time-sensitive questions. This necessitates not only the parsing of temporal information within questions but also the identification and understanding of time-evolving facts to generate accurate answers. However, current large language models still have limited sensitivity to temporal information and their inadequate temporal reasoning capabilities.In this paper, we propose a novel framework that enhances temporal awareness and reasoning through Temporal Information-Aware Embedding and Granular Contrastive Reinforcement Learning. Experimental results on four TSQA datasets demonstrate that our framework significantly outperforms existing LLMs in TSQA tasks, marking a step forward in bridging the performance gap between machine and human temporal understanding and reasoning.
Read more9/26/2024
0
On the Robustness of Language Models for Tabular Question Answering
Kushal Raj Bhandari, Sixue Xing, Soham Dan, Jianxi Gao
Large Language Models (LLMs), originally shown to ace various text comprehension tasks have also remarkably been shown to tackle table comprehension tasks without specific training. While previous research has explored LLM capabilities with tabular dataset tasks, our study assesses the influence of $textit{in-context learning}$,$ textit{model scale}$, $textit{instruction tuning}$, and $textit{domain biases}$ on Tabular Question Answering (TQA). We evaluate the robustness of LLMs on Wikipedia-based $textbf{WTQ}$ and financial report-based $textbf{TAT-QA}$ TQA datasets, focusing on their ability to robustly interpret tabular data under various augmentations and perturbations. Our findings indicate that instructions significantly enhance performance, with recent models like Llama3 exhibiting greater robustness over earlier versions. However, data contamination and practical reliability issues persist, especially with WTQ. We highlight the need for improved methodologies, including structure-aware self-attention mechanisms and better handling of domain-specific tabular data, to develop more reliable LLMs for table comprehension.
Read more6/19/2024
0
From Internal Conflict to Contextual Adaptation of Language Models
Sara Vera Marjanovi'c, Haeun Yu, Pepa Atanasova, Maria Maistro, Christina Lioma, Isabelle Augenstein
Knowledge-intensive language understanding tasks require Language Models (LMs) to integrate relevant context, mitigating their inherent weaknesses, such as incomplete or outdated knowledge. Nevertheless, studies indicate that LMs often ignore the provided context as it can conflict with the pre-existing LM's memory learned during pre-training. Moreover, conflicting knowledge can already be present in the LM's parameters, termed intra-memory conflict. Existing works have studied the two types of knowledge conflicts only in isolation. We conjecture that the (degree of) intra-memory conflicts can in turn affect LM's handling of context-memory conflicts. To study this, we introduce the DYNAMICQA dataset, which includes facts with a temporal dynamic nature where a fact can change with a varying time frequency and disputable dynamic facts, which can change depending on the viewpoint. DYNAMICQA is the first to include real-world knowledge conflicts and provide context to study the link between the different types of knowledge conflicts. With the proposed dataset, we assess the use of uncertainty for measuring the intra-memory conflict and introduce a novel Coherent Persuasion (CP) score to evaluate the context's ability to sway LM's semantic output. Our extensive experiments reveal that static facts, which are unlikely to change, are more easily updated with additional context, relative to temporal and disputable facts.
Read more7/25/2024