Sample Complexity of Variance-reduced Distributionally Robust Q-learning

Overview

• Reinforcement learning models can be affected by shifts in the distribution of the environment during deployment compared to training.
• This paper presents two novel model-free algorithms to learn a robust policy despite such distributional shifts.
• The algorithms efficiently approximate a robust Q-function for an infinite-horizon, gamma-discounted Markov decision process with a Kullback-Leibler ambiguity set.
• The variance-reduced version combines Q-learning with variance reduction techniques for enhanced performance.
• The paper establishes a minimax sample complexity bound that is independent of the ambiguity size, providing new theoretical insights.
• Numerical experiments confirm the algorithms' effectiveness in handling distributional shifts.

Plain English Explanation

Reinforcement learning (RL) models are trained on data from a particular environment, but they may need to operate in a different environment when deployed. This can cause issues, as the distribution of the new environment may differ from the training environment.

To address this problem, the researchers developed two new RL algorithms that can learn a "robust" policy - one that performs well even when the environment changes. These algorithms approximate a special type of Q-function, which is a key component in many RL methods.

The first algorithm, Distributionally Robust Q-Learning, efficiently computes this robust Q-function. The second algorithm, Variance-Reduced Distributionally Robust Q-Learning, combines this with techniques to reduce the variance of the estimates, further improving performance.

Importantly, the paper shows that the second algorithm has a sample complexity (the number of samples required to learn a good policy) that does not depend on the size of the "ambiguity set" - a measure of how different the new environment can be from the training environment. This is a novel theoretical result, providing new insights into the challenges of dealing with distributional shifts in RL.

The researchers also demonstrate the effectiveness of their algorithms through numerical experiments, showing that they can handle distributional shifts better than standard RL methods.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents two novel model-free algorithms for Distributionally Robust Reinforcement Learning in infinite-horizon, gamma-discounted Markov Decision Processes (MDPs).

The first algorithm, Distributionally Robust Q-Learning, efficiently approximates the robust Q-function of the MDP, which is the optimal value function under a Kullback-Leibler ambiguity set. This allows the agent to learn a policy that performs well even when the environment changes during deployment.

The second algorithm, Variance-Reduced Distributionally Robust Q-Learning, combines the synchronous Q-learning update with variance reduction techniques to enhance the performance of the first algorithm.

The paper establishes a minimax sample complexity upper bound for the second algorithm that is independent of the ambiguity size, which is a novel theoretical result. This provides new insights into the sample complexity of Distributionally Robust RL.

The numerical experiments confirm the theoretical findings and demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms in handling distributional shifts compared to standard RL methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thorough theoretical analysis of the proposed algorithms, including establishing sample complexity bounds. However, the authors do not discuss potential limitations or caveats of their approach.

For example, the algorithms assume access to a generative model of the environment, which may not be available in many real-world applications. Additionally, the performance guarantees are derived in an asymptotic sense, and it is unclear how the algorithms would perform in finite-sample regimes.

Furthermore, the paper does not compare the proposed methods to other approaches for handling distributional shifts, such as domain adaptation or robust optimization techniques. Exploring the relative strengths and weaknesses of different strategies for this problem would provide a more complete picture.

Lastly, the numerical experiments are limited to relatively simple benchmark tasks. Evaluating the algorithms on more complex, real-world problems would help assess their practical applicability and effectiveness in handling realistic distributional shifts.

Conclusion

This paper introduces two novel model-free algorithms for Distributionally Robust Reinforcement Learning, which can learn a robust policy despite shifts in the environment distribution between training and deployment.

The key contributions of the work include the efficient approximation of the robust Q-function, the incorporation of variance reduction techniques to enhance performance, and the establishment of a sample complexity bound that is independent of the ambiguity size - a novel theoretical result.

The proposed algorithms demonstrate promising empirical results in handling distributional shifts, but further research is needed to assess their limitations, compare them to alternative approaches, and evaluate their performance on more challenging real-world problems.

Overall, this paper advances the state of the art in reinforcement learning under distributional shifts, an important problem with significant practical implications.