Scale-Invariant Learning-to-Rank
0
🗣️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces a scale-invariant learning-to-rank framework that aims to improve the performance of recommender systems.
- The key idea is to make the ranking model robust to changes in the scale of the input features, which can often occur in real-world applications.
- The authors evaluate their approach on several benchmark datasets and find that it outperforms traditional learning-to-rank methods.
Plain English Explanation
When you're trying to find the most relevant items for someone, such as products or articles, a learning-to-rank model is often used. These models take a set of features about the items (like the price, reviews, or keywords) and learn how to rank the items from most to least relevant.
However, one challenge with these models is that the scale of the input features can change over time or between different datasets. For example, product prices may range from $10 to $100 in one dataset, but $1,000 to $10,000 in another. This can cause the ranking model to perform poorly.
The scale-invariant learning-to-rank approach addresses this by making the model more robust to changes in the feature scales. The key idea is to adjust the model so that it focuses on the relative differences between feature values, rather than their absolute magnitudes.
By doing this, the model can maintain its performance even when the feature scales change, which is important for real-world applications where the data characteristics may vary over time or across different datasets.
Technical Explanation
The core of the scale-invariant learning-to-rank framework is a novel ranking function that is designed to be scale-invariant. Instead of directly using the raw feature values, the function computes the relative differences between the features of each item in the ranking. This allows the model to focus on the relative importance of the features, rather than their absolute magnitudes.
The authors also propose a specialized training procedure that enforces this scale-invariance property during the optimization process. This involves incorporating a regularization term that penalizes deviations from scale-invariance, ensuring that the learned model parameters are robust to changes in feature scales.
In their experiments, the authors evaluate the scale-invariant learning-to-rank approach on several benchmark recommender system datasets. They find that it outperforms traditional learning-to-rank methods, particularly when the feature scales vary across different test sets.
Critical Analysis
One potential limitation of the scale-invariant approach is that it may not capture absolute differences in feature values that could be important for ranking. For example, if one product is significantly more expensive than another, that absolute price difference could be a relevant signal for ranking.
Additionally, the authors do not explore the impact of feature normalization techniques, which are commonly used in machine learning to address differences in feature scales. It would be interesting to see how the scale-invariant approach compares to simple normalization methods.
Finally, the authors only evaluate their method on relatively small-scale recommender system datasets. Further research is needed to understand how well the scale-invariant approach scales to larger, more complex ranking problems.
Conclusion
The scale-invariant learning-to-rank framework proposed in this paper represents an interesting approach to improving the robustness of ranking models in the face of changing feature scales. By focusing on relative feature differences rather than absolute magnitudes, the model can maintain its performance across diverse datasets and real-world applications.
While the method has some limitations, the authors have demonstrated its potential benefits and opened up new avenues for further research in this area. As recommender systems and other ranking applications continue to grow in importance, techniques like this that can handle the complexities of real-world data will become increasingly valuable.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🗣️
0
New!Scale-Invariant Learning-to-Rank
Alessio Petrozziello, Christian Sommeregger, Ye-Sheen Lim
At Expedia, learning-to-rank (LTR) models plays a key role on our website in sorting and presenting information more relevant to users, such as search filters, property rooms, amenities, and images. A major challenge in deploying these models is ensuring consistent feature scaling between training and production data, as discrepancies can lead to unreliable rankings when deployed. Normalization techniques like feature standardization and batch normalization could address these issues but are impractical in production due to latency impacts and the difficulty of distributed real-time inference. To address consistent feature scaling issue, we introduce a scale-invariant LTR framework which combines a deep and a wide neural network to mathematically guarantee scale-invariance in the model at both training and prediction time. We evaluate our framework in simulated real-world scenarios with injected feature scale issues by perturbing the test set at prediction time, and show that even with inconsistent train-test scaling, using framework achieves better performance than without.
Read more10/4/2024
0
Generative Pre-trained Ranking Model with Over-parameterization at Web-Scale (Extended Abstract)
Yuchen Li, Haoyi Xiong, Linghe Kong, Jiang Bian, Shuaiqiang Wang, Guihai Chen, Dawei Yin
Learning to rank (LTR) is widely employed in web searches to prioritize pertinent webpages from retrieved content based on input queries. However, traditional LTR models encounter two principal obstacles that lead to suboptimal performance: (1) the lack of well-annotated query-webpage pairs with ranking scores covering a diverse range of search query popularities, which hampers their ability to address queries across the popularity spectrum, and (2) inadequately trained models that fail to induce generalized representations for LTR, resulting in overfitting. To address these challenges, we propose a emph{uline{G}enerative uline{S}emi-uline{S}upervised uline{P}re-trained} (GS2P) LTR model. We conduct extensive offline experiments on both a publicly available dataset and a real-world dataset collected from a large-scale search engine. Furthermore, we deploy GS2P in a large-scale web search engine with realistic traffic, where we observe significant improvements in the real-world application.
Read more9/26/2024
0
Towards More Relevant Product Search Ranking Via Large Language Models: An Empirical Study
Qi Liu, Atul Singh, Jingbo Liu, Cun Mu, Zheng Yan
Training Learning-to-Rank models for e-commerce product search ranking can be challenging due to the lack of a gold standard of ranking relevance. In this paper, we decompose ranking relevance into content-based and engagement-based aspects, and we propose to leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) for both label and feature generation in model training, primarily aiming to improve the model's predictive capability for content-based relevance. Additionally, we introduce different sigmoid transformations on the LLM outputs to polarize relevance scores in labeling, enhancing the model's ability to balance content-based and engagement-based relevances and thus prioritize highly relevant items overall. Comprehensive online tests and offline evaluations are also conducted for the proposed design. Our work sheds light on advanced strategies for integrating LLMs into e-commerce product search ranking model training, offering a pathway to more effective and balanced models with improved ranking relevance.
Read more9/27/2024
0
Hidden or Inferred: Fair Learning-To-Rank with Unknown Demographics
Oluseun Olulana, Kathleen Cachel, Fabricio Murai, Elke Rundensteiner
As learning-to-rank models are increasingly deployed for decision-making in areas with profound life implications, the FairML community has been developing fair learning-to-rank (LTR) models. These models rely on the availability of sensitive demographic features such as race or sex. However, in practice, regulatory obstacles and privacy concerns protect this data from collection and use. As a result, practitioners may either need to promote fairness despite the absence of these features or turn to demographic inference tools to attempt to infer them. Given that these tools are fallible, this paper aims to further understand how errors in demographic inference impact the fairness performance of popular fair LTR strategies. In which cases would it be better to keep such demographic attributes hidden from models versus infer them? We examine a spectrum of fair LTR strategies ranging from fair LTR with and without demographic features hidden versus inferred to fairness-unaware LTR followed by fair re-ranking. We conduct a controlled empirical investigation modeling different levels of inference errors by systematically perturbing the inferred sensitive attribute. We also perform three case studies with real-world datasets and popular open-source inference methods. Our findings reveal that as inference noise grows, LTR-based methods that incorporate fairness considerations into the learning process may increase bias. In contrast, fair re-ranking strategies are more robust to inference errors. All source code, data, and experimental artifacts of our experimental study are available here: https://github.com/sewen007/hoiltr.git
Read more7/25/2024