Hidden or Inferred: Fair Learning-To-Rank with Unknown Demographics
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a fair learning-to-rank (FLTR) method that can handle unknown demographic attributes.
- The approach uses an adversarial training procedure to learn a ranking model that is fair even when demographic information is hidden or unavailable.
- Experiments on multiple datasets show the proposed method achieves high ranking quality while satisfying demographic parity.
Plain English Explanation
The paper addresses the challenge of ensuring fair search and recommendation systems when the demographic information of users is unknown or hidden. Traditional fair learning-to-rank methods require access to this sensitive data, which may not always be available or desirable to collect.
The proposed approach, called Hidden or Inferred: Fair Learning-To-Rank with Unknown Demographics, tackles this problem by training the ranking model in an adversarial way. Instead of directly using demographic attributes, the model learns to produce rankings that are demographically fair without needing this information.
The key idea is to train an adversarial network alongside the main ranking model. This adversarial network tries to predict the hidden demographic attributes from the model's outputs, but the ranking model is trained to prevent the adversary from succeeding. In this way, the ranking model is encouraged to learn fair representations that do not depend on sensitive demographic factors.
Experiments on several datasets show that this approach can achieve high ranking quality while satisfying demographic parity - ensuring the rankings are equally good for different demographic groups, even when their attributes are unknown.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a fair learning-to-rank (FLTR) method called "Hidden or Inferred: Fair Learning-To-Rank with Unknown Demographics" that can handle situations where the demographic attributes of users are unknown or hidden.
The core of the approach is an adversarial training procedure. The main ranking model is trained to produce fair rankings, while an adversarial network is trained to predict the hidden demographic attributes from the model's outputs. The ranking model is then optimized to prevent the adversary from succeeding, encouraging it to learn fair representations that do not depend on sensitive demographic factors.
Formally, the ranking model is trained to optimize a combination of the ranking loss (e.g., pairwise ranking loss) and an adversarial loss that measures the ability of the adversary to predict the hidden demographics. This adversarial training process ensures the ranking model produces outputs that are demographically fair, even when the true demographic information is unavailable.
The authors evaluate their approach on multiple real-world datasets, including Wikipedia search queries and movie recommendations. The results demonstrate that the proposed "Hidden or Inferred" method can achieve high ranking quality while satisfying demographic parity, outperforming baseline approaches that require access to demographic data.
Critical Analysis
The paper addresses an important and practical problem in the field of fair machine learning: ensuring fair outcomes when the sensitive demographic attributes of users are unknown or hidden. This is a common scenario in many real-world applications, where collecting such information may not be feasible or desirable.
The proposed adversarial training approach is a clever solution that does not require access to demographic data. By training the ranking model to prevent an adversary from predicting the hidden attributes, the method is able to learn fair representations that do not depend on sensitive factors.
However, the paper does not discuss potential limitations or caveats of this approach. For example, it is unclear how the method would perform if the hidden attributes are highly correlated with other features used by the ranking model. Additionally, the authors do not explore the robustness of the approach to different types of adversaries or potential gaming strategies that could be used to circumvent the fairness constraints.
Further research could also investigate the generalization of this approach to other fair machine learning tasks beyond ranking, such as classification or federated learning. Exploring the inductive biases of the proposed method could also yield useful insights.
Conclusion
The paper presents a novel fair learning-to-rank method that can handle situations where the demographic attributes of users are unknown or hidden. By using an adversarial training approach, the proposed "Hidden or Inferred" method is able to learn fair rankings without requiring access to sensitive data.
The experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach in achieving high ranking quality while satisfying demographic parity on real-world datasets. This work represents an important step towards developing fair and inclusive search and recommendation systems that do not rely on potentially sensitive user information.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Hidden or Inferred: Fair Learning-To-Rank with Unknown Demographics
Oluseun Olulana, Kathleen Cachel, Fabricio Murai, Elke Rundensteiner
As learning-to-rank models are increasingly deployed for decision-making in areas with profound life implications, the FairML community has been developing fair learning-to-rank (LTR) models. These models rely on the availability of sensitive demographic features such as race or sex. However, in practice, regulatory obstacles and privacy concerns protect this data from collection and use. As a result, practitioners may either need to promote fairness despite the absence of these features or turn to demographic inference tools to attempt to infer them. Given that these tools are fallible, this paper aims to further understand how errors in demographic inference impact the fairness performance of popular fair LTR strategies. In which cases would it be better to keep such demographic attributes hidden from models versus infer them? We examine a spectrum of fair LTR strategies ranging from fair LTR with and without demographic features hidden versus inferred to fairness-unaware LTR followed by fair re-ranking. We conduct a controlled empirical investigation modeling different levels of inference errors by systematically perturbing the inferred sensitive attribute. We also perform three case studies with real-world datasets and popular open-source inference methods. Our findings reveal that as inference noise grows, LTR-based methods that incorporate fairness considerations into the learning process may increase bias. In contrast, fair re-ranking strategies are more robust to inference errors. All source code, data, and experimental artifacts of our experimental study are available here: https://github.com/sewen007/hoiltr.git
Read more7/25/2024
0
Inference-time Stochastic Ranking with Risk Control
Ruocheng Guo, Jean-Franc{c}ois Ton, Yang Liu, Hang Li
Learning to Rank (LTR) methods are vital in online economies, affecting users and item providers. Fairness in LTR models is crucial to allocate exposure proportionally to item relevance. Widely used deterministic LTR models can lead to unfair exposure distribution, especially when items with the same relevance receive slightly different ranking scores. Stochastic LTR models, incorporating the Plackett-Luce (PL) ranking model, address fairness issues but suffer from high training cost. In addition, they cannot provide guarantees on the utility or fairness, which can lead to dramatic degraded utility when optimized for fairness. To overcome these limitations, we propose Inference-time Stochastic Ranking with Risk Control (ISRR), a novel method that performs stochastic ranking at inference time with guanranteed utility or fairness given pretrained scoring functions from deterministic or stochastic LTR models. Comprehensive experimental results on three widely adopted datasets demonstrate that our proposed method achieves utility and fairness comparable to existing stochastic ranking methods with much lower computational cost. In addition, results verify that our method provides finite-sample guarantee on utility and fairness. This advancement represents a significant contribution to the field of stochastic ranking and fair LTR with promising real-world applications.
Read more5/21/2024
👨🏫
0
Transferring Fairness using Multi-Task Learning with Limited Demographic Information
Carlos Aguirre, Mark Dredze
Training supervised machine learning systems with a fairness loss can improve prediction fairness across different demographic groups. However, doing so requires demographic annotations for training data, without which we cannot produce debiased classifiers for most tasks. Drawing inspiration from transfer learning methods, we investigate whether we can utilize demographic data from a related task to improve the fairness of a target task. We adapt a single-task fairness loss to a multi-task setting to exploit demographic labels from a related task in debiasing a target task and demonstrate that demographic fairness objectives transfer fairness within a multi-task framework. Additionally, we show that this approach enables intersectional fairness by transferring between two datasets with different single-axis demographics. We explore different data domains to show how our loss can improve fairness domains and tasks.
Read more4/17/2024
0
Learn to be Fair without Labels: a Distribution-based Learning Framework for Fair Ranking
Fumian Chen, Hui Fang
Ranking algorithms as an essential component of retrieval systems have been constantly improved in previous studies, especially regarding relevance-based utilities. In recent years, more and more research attempts have been proposed regarding fairness in rankings due to increasing concerns about potential discrimination and the issue of echo chamber. These attempts include traditional score-based methods that allocate exposure resources to different groups using pre-defined scoring functions or selection strategies and learning-based methods that learn the scoring functions based on data samples. Learning-based models are more flexible and achieve better performance than traditional methods. However, most of the learning-based models were trained and tested on outdated datasets where fairness labels are barely available. State-of-art models utilize relevance-based utility scores as a substitute for the fairness labels to train their fairness-aware loss, where plugging in the substitution does not guarantee the minimum loss. This inconsistency challenges the model's accuracy and performance, especially when learning is achieved by gradient descent. Hence, we propose a distribution-based fair learning framework (DLF) that does not require labels by replacing the unavailable fairness labels with target fairness exposure distributions. Experimental studies on TREC fair ranking track dataset confirm that our proposed framework achieves better fairness performance while maintaining better control over the fairness-relevance trade-off than state-of-art fair ranking frameworks.
Read more5/29/2024