Is Interpretable Machine Learning Effective at Feature Selection for Neural Learning-to-Rank?

Read original: arXiv:2405.07782 - Published 5/14/2024 by Lijun Lyu, Nirmal Roy, Harrie Oosterhuis, Avishek Anand

✨

Overview

Neural ranking models are becoming popular for search and recommendation systems, but they are less interpretable than traditional tree-based models.
Interpretability is important for real-world systems, so this work explores feature selection methods to understand how neural learning-to-rank (LTR) models make their decisions.
The authors investigate several interpretable machine learning techniques and introduce their own modification to select the most important input features for the ranking behavior.
They also study whether these feature selection methods can contribute to efficiency improvements.

Plain English Explanation

When you search for something online or get recommendations from a service, the system behind the scenes is using a machine learning model to decide what results to show you. These models are getting more and more advanced, using neural networks that can learn complex patterns in data.

However, the downside of these neural models is that they are "black boxes" - it's very difficult to understand how they are actually making their decisions. This lack of interpretability is a problem, especially for real-world applications where you want to be able to explain why the system is recommending certain things.

In this paper, the researchers explore ways to make neural ranking models more interpretable. They look at different feature selection techniques from the field of interpretable machine learning, which aim to identify the most important input features that are driving the model's outputs. The authors also introduce their own new method called G-L2X for this purpose.

The researchers test these feature selection methods on a few standard datasets used for training ranking models. They find that these techniques can significantly reduce the number of features needed while still maintaining the model's performance. This suggests the potential for improving the efficiency and interpretability of these neural ranking systems.

Overall, the goal is to bring the fields of interpretable machine learning and ranking models closer together, so that real-world search and recommendation systems can be more transparent and easier to understand.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the use of feature selection techniques to improve the interpretability of neural learning-to-rank (LTR) models. Unlike traditional tree-based ranking models, neural models are much less transparent, making it difficult to understand their inner workings and decision-making process.

The authors explore six widely-used interpretable machine learning (ML) methods, including TabNet, Shapley values, and feature importance based on permutation. They also introduce their own modified technique called G-L2X, which builds on the L2X method for feature selection.

Through experiments on several LTR benchmarks, the researchers find a significant degree of feature redundancy. For example, the local selection method TabNet can achieve optimal ranking performance using less than 10 features. The global methods, particularly G-L2X, require slightly more selected features but exhibit higher potential for improving efficiency.

The authors argue that their analysis of these feature selection techniques can help bring the fields of interpretable ML and LTR closer together, which is crucial for the real-world deployment of transparent and explainable ranking systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a valuable contribution by exploring the application of interpretable machine learning techniques to neural learning-to-rank models. The researchers acknowledge the importance of interpretability for real-world systems and demonstrate the potential of feature selection methods to enhance the transparency of these models.

However, the paper does not delve deeper into the practical implications and potential limitations of their findings. For instance, it would be interesting to understand how these feature selection techniques perform in more complex, large-scale ranking systems, and whether the reduced feature sets maintain their effectiveness in such settings.

Additionally, while the authors introduce their own G-L2X method, they do not provide a thorough comparison of its performance against the other techniques or discuss any unique advantages it may offer. Further exploration of the strengths and weaknesses of the different feature selection approaches would strengthen the paper's overall contribution.

Overall, the research presents a promising direction for bridging the gap between interpretable machine learning and neural ranking models. Continued work in this area could lead to more transparent and trustworthy search and recommendation systems that can better explain their decision-making to end-users.

Conclusion

This paper investigates the use of feature selection techniques to improve the interpretability of neural learning-to-rank models, which are becoming increasingly popular in real-world search and recommendation systems. The authors explore several interpretable machine learning methods, including their own modified approach, to identify the most important input features driving the ranking behavior of these neural models.

The experimental results reveal significant feature redundancy in standard LTR benchmarks, suggesting that effective feature selection can lead to more efficient and interpretable ranking systems. The researchers hope that their analysis will help bring the fields of interpretable machine learning and learning-to-rank closer together, enabling the development of more transparent and explainable real-world applications.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

✨

Is Interpretable Machine Learning Effective at Feature Selection for Neural Learning-to-Rank?

Lijun Lyu, Nirmal Roy, Harrie Oosterhuis, Avishek Anand

Neural ranking models have become increasingly popular for real-world search and recommendation systems in recent years. Unlike their tree-based counterparts, neural models are much less interpretable. That is, it is very difficult to understand their inner workings and answer questions like how do they make their ranking decisions? or what document features do they find important? This is particularly disadvantageous since interpretability is highly important for real-world systems. In this work, we explore feature selection for neural learning-to-rank (LTR). In particular, we investigate six widely-used methods from the field of interpretable machine learning (ML) and introduce our own modification, to select the input features that are most important to the ranking behavior. To understand whether these methods are useful for practitioners, we further study whether they contribute to efficiency enhancement. Our experimental results reveal a large feature redundancy in several LTR benchmarks: the local selection method TabNet can achieve optimal ranking performance with less than 10 features; the global methods, particularly our G-L2X, require slightly more selected features, but exhibit higher potential in improving efficiency. We hope that our analysis of these feature selection methods will bring the fields of interpretable ML and LTR closer together.

5/14/2024

A Critical Assessment of Interpretable and Explainable Machine Learning for Intrusion Detection

Omer Subasi, Johnathan Cree, Joseph Manzano, Elena Peterson

There has been a large number of studies in interpretable and explainable ML for cybersecurity, in particular, for intrusion detection. Many of these studies have significant amount of overlapping and repeated evaluations and analysis. At the same time, these studies overlook crucial model, data, learning process, and utility related issues and many times completely disregard them. These issues include the use of overly complex and opaque ML models, unaccounted data imbalances and correlated features, inconsistent influential features across different explanation methods, the inconsistencies stemming from the constituents of a learning process, and the implausible utility of explanations. In this work, we empirically demonstrate these issues, analyze them and propose practical solutions in the context of feature-based model explanations. Specifically, we advise avoiding complex opaque models such as Deep Neural Networks and instead using interpretable ML models such as Decision Trees as the available intrusion datasets are not difficult for such interpretable models to classify successfully. Then, we bring attention to the binary classification metrics such as Matthews Correlation Coefficient (which are well-suited for imbalanced datasets. Moreover, we find that feature-based model explanations are most often inconsistent across different settings. In this respect, to further gauge the extent of inconsistencies, we introduce the notion of cross explanations which corroborates that the features that are determined to be impactful by one explanation method most often differ from those by another method. Furthermore, we show that strongly correlated data features and the constituents of a learning process, such as hyper-parameters and the optimization routine, become yet another source of inconsistent explanations. Finally, we discuss the utility of feature-based explanations.

7/8/2024

An Interpretable Alternative to Neural Representation Learning for Rating Prediction -- Transparent Latent Class Modeling of User Reviews

Giuseppe Serra, Peter Tino, Zhao Xu, Xin Yao

Nowadays, neural network (NN) and deep learning (DL) techniques are widely adopted in many applications, including recommender systems. Given the sparse and stochastic nature of collaborative filtering (CF) data, recent works have critically analyzed the effective improvement of neural-based approaches compared to simpler and often transparent algorithms for recommendation. Previous results showed that NN and DL models can be outperformed by traditional algorithms in many tasks. Moreover, given the largely black-box nature of neural-based methods, interpretable results are not naturally obtained. Following on this debate, we first present a transparent probabilistic model that topologically organizes user and product latent classes based on the review information. In contrast to popular neural techniques for representation learning, we readily obtain a statistical, visualization-friendly tool that can be easily inspected to understand user and product characteristics from a textual-based perspective. Then, given the limitations of common embedding techniques, we investigate the possibility of using the estimated interpretable quantities as model input for a rating prediction task. To contribute to the recent debates, we evaluate our results in terms of both capacity for interpretability and predictive performances in comparison with popular text-based neural approaches. The results demonstrate that the proposed latent class representations can yield competitive predictive performances, compared to popular, but difficult-to-interpret approaches.

7/2/2024

LLM-based feature generation from text for interpretable machine learning

Vojtv{e}ch Balek, Luk'av{s} S'ykora, Vil'em Sklen'ak, Tom'av{s} Kliegr

Existing text representations such as embeddings and bag-of-words are not suitable for rule learning due to their high dimensionality and absent or questionable feature-level interpretability. This article explores whether large language models (LLMs) could address this by extracting a small number of interpretable features from text. We demonstrate this process on two datasets (CORD-19 and M17+) containing several thousand scientific articles from multiple disciplines and a target being a proxy for research impact. An evaluation based on testing for the statistically significant correlation with research impact has shown that LLama 2-generated features are semantically meaningful. We consequently used these generated features in text classification to predict the binary target variable representing the citation rate for the CORD-19 dataset and the ordinal 5-class target representing an expert-awarded grade in the M17+ dataset. Machine-learning models trained on the LLM-generated features provided similar predictive performance to the state-of-the-art embedding model SciBERT for scientific text. The LLM used only 62 features compared to 768 features in SciBERT embeddings, and these features were directly interpretable, corresponding to notions such as article methodological rigor, novelty, or grammatical correctness. As the final step, we extract a small number of well-interpretable action rules. Consistently competitive results obtained with the same LLM feature set across both thematically diverse datasets show that this approach generalizes across domains.

9/12/2024