Scaling Laws for Data Poisoning in LLMs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores the scaling laws for data poisoning attacks against large language models (LLMs).
- Data poisoning is a technique where an attacker injects malicious data into the training dataset to compromise the model's performance or behavior.
- The researchers investigate how the effectiveness of data poisoning attacks scales with the size of the training dataset and the model complexity.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at a type of attack called "data poisoning" against large AI language models. In a data poisoning attack, the attacker deliberately adds some bad or misleading data into the training data for the AI model. This can cause the model to learn the wrong things and behave in unintended ways.
The researchers wanted to understand how the effectiveness of these data poisoning attacks changes as the training dataset gets larger and the AI model gets more complex. They found that as the dataset and model get bigger, the data poisoning attacks become more and more potent. This is concerning because the largest AI language models today are trained on massive amounts of online data, making them potentially vulnerable to these types of attacks.
The key takeaway is that as AI models continue to grow in scale, they may become increasingly susceptible to data poisoning threats. This is an important consideration for companies and researchers developing these powerful language models, as they'll need to find ways to make the models more robust and resistant to these types of attacks.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the scaling laws that govern the effectiveness of data poisoning attacks against large language models (LLMs). Data poisoning is a threat model where an attacker injects malicious data into the training dataset in order to compromise the model's performance or induce undesirable behaviors.
The researchers study how the effectiveness of data poisoning attacks scales with the size of the training dataset and the model complexity. They find that as the dataset and model size increase, the data poisoning attacks become more potent. This is concerning given the massive scale of today's largest language models, which are trained on vast troves of online data.
The paper provides both theoretical analysis and empirical validation of these scaling laws. The theoretical analysis draws insights from gradient-based poisoning attacks and privacy risks in large language models. The empirical evaluation demonstrates the practical feasibility of data poisoning attacks at scale.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling analysis of the scaling properties of data poisoning attacks against LLMs. The authors acknowledge several caveats and limitations, such as the need for further research on more advanced threat models and defense strategies.
One potential area for further exploration is the impact of different types of data poisoning (e.g. targeted vs. indiscriminate attacks) and their interaction with model training procedures. Additionally, the paper focuses on the threat of data poisoning, but does not delve into potential mitigations or robust training techniques that could help defend against these attacks.
Overall, this research highlights an important security consideration for the development of large-scale language models. As these models continue to grow in size and capability, the risks posed by data poisoning may become an increasingly pressing challenge for the AI community to address.
Conclusion
This paper provides valuable insights into the scaling properties of data poisoning attacks against large language models. The key finding is that as LLMs become larger and more complex, they become increasingly vulnerable to data poisoning threats. This is a significant concern given the massive scale of today's most advanced language models.
The analysis in this paper underscores the need for continued research into robust training techniques and defense mechanisms that can help mitigate the risks of data poisoning. Ensuring the security and reliability of large-scale language models will be crucial as these powerful AI systems become more widely deployed in high-stakes applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Scaling Laws for Data Poisoning in LLMs
Dillon Bowen, Brendan Murphy, Will Cai, David Khachaturov, Adam Gleave, Kellin Pelrine
Recent work shows that LLMs are vulnerable to data poisoning, in which they are trained on partially corrupted or harmful data. Poisoned data is hard to detect, breaks guardrails, and leads to undesirable and harmful behavior. Given the intense efforts by leading labs to train and deploy increasingly larger and more capable LLMs, it is critical to ask if the risk of data poisoning will be naturally mitigated by scale, or if it is an increasing threat. We consider three threat models by which data poisoning can occur: malicious fine-tuning, imperfect data curation, and intentional data contamination. Our experiments evaluate the effects of data poisoning on 23 frontier LLMs ranging from 1.5-72 billion parameters on three datasets which speak to each of our threat models. We find that larger LLMs are increasingly vulnerable, learning harmful behavior significantly more quickly than smaller LLMs with even minimal data poisoning. These results underscore the need for robust safeguards against data poisoning in larger LLMs.
Read more9/4/2024
0
Turning Generative Models Degenerate: The Power of Data Poisoning Attacks
Shuli Jiang, Swanand Ravindra Kadhe, Yi Zhou, Farhan Ahmed, Ling Cai, Nathalie Baracaldo
The increasing use of large language models (LLMs) trained by third parties raises significant security concerns. In particular, malicious actors can introduce backdoors through poisoning attacks to generate undesirable outputs. While such attacks have been extensively studied in image domains and classification tasks, they remain underexplored for natural language generation (NLG) tasks. To address this gap, we conduct an investigation of various poisoning techniques targeting the LLM's fine-tuning phase via prefix-tuning, a Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) method. We assess their effectiveness across two generative tasks: text summarization and text completion; and we also introduce new metrics to quantify the success and stealthiness of such NLG poisoning attacks. Through our experiments, we find that the prefix-tuning hyperparameters and trigger designs are the most crucial factors to influence attack success and stealthiness. Moreover, we demonstrate that existing popular defenses are ineffective against our poisoning attacks. Our study presents the first systematic approach to understanding poisoning attacks targeting NLG tasks during fine-tuning via PEFT across a wide range of triggers and attack settings. We hope our findings will aid the AI security community in developing effective defenses against such threats.
Read more7/19/2024
🏋️
119
Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is Practical
Nicholas Carlini, Matthew Jagielski, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Daniel Paleka, Will Pearce, Hyrum Anderson, Andreas Terzis, Kurt Thomas, Florian Tram`er
Deep learning models are often trained on distributed, web-scale datasets crawled from the internet. In this paper, we introduce two new dataset poisoning attacks that intentionally introduce malicious examples to a model's performance. Our attacks are immediately practical and could, today, poison 10 popular datasets. Our first attack, split-view poisoning, exploits the mutable nature of internet content to ensure a dataset annotator's initial view of the dataset differs from the view downloaded by subsequent clients. By exploiting specific invalid trust assumptions, we show how we could have poisoned 0.01% of the LAION-400M or COYO-700M datasets for just $60 USD. Our second attack, frontrunning poisoning, targets web-scale datasets that periodically snapshot crowd-sourced content -- such as Wikipedia -- where an attacker only needs a time-limited window to inject malicious examples. In light of both attacks, we notify the maintainers of each affected dataset and recommended several low-overhead defenses.
Read more5/7/2024
0
The poison of dimensionality
L^e-Nguy^en Hoang
This paper advances the understanding of how the size of a machine learning model affects its vulnerability to poisoning, despite state-of-the-art defenses. Given isotropic random honest feature vectors and the geometric median (or clipped mean) as the robust gradient aggregator rule, we essentially prove that, perhaps surprisingly, linear and logistic regressions with $D geq 169 H^2/P^2$ parameters are subject to arbitrary model manipulation by poisoners, where $H$ and $P$ are the numbers of honestly labeled and poisoned data points used for training. Our experiments go on exposing a fundamental tradeoff between augmenting model expressivity and increasing the poisoners' attack surface, on both synthetic data, and on MNIST & FashionMNIST data for linear classifiers with random features. We also discuss potential implications for source-based learning and neural nets.
Read more9/27/2024