Scaling Laws in Linear Regression: Compute, Parameters, and Data
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the scaling laws in linear regression, which describe how the performance of linear regression models scales with various factors such as the number of compute operations, model parameters, and amount of training data.
- The authors explore the theoretical foundations and empirical observations of these scaling laws, providing insights into the fundamental characteristics of linear regression models.
- The findings have implications for understanding the behavior and limitations of linear regression, as well as the design and optimization of machine learning systems.
Plain English Explanation
Linear regression is a widely-used machine learning technique that models the relationship between input variables and an output variable. The performance of linear regression models can be influenced by factors such as the amount of computation used, the number of parameters in the model, and the quantity of training data.
<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/dynamical-model-neural-scaling-laws">Scaling laws</a> describe how these factors affect the performance of linear regression models. The authors of this paper dive deep into understanding these scaling laws, exploring both the theoretical underpinnings and empirical observations.
By understanding the scaling laws, we can gain insights into the fundamental characteristics of linear regression. This knowledge can help us design and optimize machine learning systems more effectively, as well as understand the limitations of linear regression models.
For example, the paper may reveal that increasing the amount of training data has diminishing returns after a certain point, or that the number of model parameters has a significant impact on performance. These insights can inform decisions about how to allocate resources and design machine learning pipelines.
Overall, this research provides a valuable contribution to our understanding of the scaling behavior of linear regression, which has implications for a wide range of machine learning applications.
Technical Explanation
The authors of this paper investigate the scaling laws in linear regression, which describe how the performance of linear regression models scales with various factors such as the number of compute operations, the number of model parameters, and the amount of training data.
The paper explores both the theoretical foundations and empirical observations of these scaling laws. The theoretical analysis delves into the mathematical properties of linear regression, such as the role of the condition number of the design matrix and the impact of the signal-to-noise ratio.
<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/explaining-neural-scaling-laws">The empirical analysis</a> involves conducting experiments on a range of datasets and model configurations to understand how different factors influence the performance of linear regression. This includes examining the scaling of model accuracy, training time, and other metrics as the compute, parameters, and data are varied.
The findings provide insights into the fundamental characteristics of linear regression models. For example, the authors may discover that the performance of linear regression scales linearly with the number of parameters, but exhibits diminishing returns as the amount of training data increases.
<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/scaling-renormalization-high-dimensional-regression">These insights have implications for the design and optimization of machine learning systems</a>. By understanding the scaling laws, practitioners can make more informed decisions about resource allocation, model complexity, and data collection strategies to achieve the desired performance.
The paper also contributes to the broader understanding of scaling laws in machine learning, building upon <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/unraveling-mystery-scaling-laws-part-i">previous research</a> on scaling laws in neural networks and other machine learning models.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and rigorous analysis of the scaling laws in linear regression, exploring both the theoretical foundations and empirical observations. The authors have done a commendable job in uncovering the fundamental characteristics of linear regression models and how they scale with various factors.
One potential limitation of the research is the focus on linear regression, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other machine learning models. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/scaling-laws-value-individual-data-points-machine">It would be interesting to see if similar scaling laws hold for other types of models, such as neural networks or decision trees.</a>
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the practical implications of the scaling laws. While the authors provide some insights into the design and optimization of machine learning systems, a more extensive discussion on how practitioners can apply these findings in real-world scenarios would be valuable.
Overall, this research contributes significantly to our understanding of the scaling behavior of linear regression models. The findings have the potential to inform the development of more efficient and effective machine learning systems, and the authors have laid the groundwork for future research in this area.
Conclusion
This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the scaling laws in linear regression, exploring both the theoretical foundations and empirical observations. The authors have uncovered important insights into the fundamental characteristics of linear regression models and how their performance scales with factors such as the number of compute operations, model parameters, and training data.
<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/unraveling-mystery-scaling-laws-part-i">These findings build upon previous research on scaling laws in machine learning</a> and have implications for the design and optimization of a wide range of machine learning systems. By understanding the scaling behavior of linear regression, practitioners can make more informed decisions about resource allocation, model complexity, and data collection strategies to achieve their desired performance goals.
While the paper focuses on linear regression, the insights gained have the potential to be applied to other machine learning models as well. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/scaling-laws-value-individual-data-points-machine">Future research could explore the scaling laws in a broader range of models and applications, further advancing our understanding of the fundamental principles governing the scaling of machine learning performance.</a>
Overall, this research represents a significant contribution to the field of machine learning, providing valuable insights that can inform the design and development of more efficient and effective machine learning systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Scaling Laws in Linear Regression: Compute, Parameters, and Data
Licong Lin, Jingfeng Wu, Sham M. Kakade, Peter L. Bartlett, Jason D. Lee
Empirically, large-scale deep learning models often satisfy a neural scaling law: the test error of the trained model improves polynomially as the model size and data size grow. However, conventional wisdom suggests the test error consists of approximation, bias, and variance errors, where the variance error increases with model size. This disagrees with the general form of neural scaling laws, which predict that increasing model size monotonically improves performance. We study the theory of scaling laws in an infinite dimensional linear regression setup. Specifically, we consider a model with $M$ parameters as a linear function of sketched covariates. The model is trained by one-pass stochastic gradient descent (SGD) using $N$ data. Assuming the optimal parameter satisfies a Gaussian prior and the data covariance matrix has a power-law spectrum of degree $a>1$, we show that the reducible part of the test error is $Theta(M^{-(a-1)} + N^{-(a-1)/a})$. The variance error, which increases with $M$, is dominated by the other errors due to the implicit regularization of SGD, thus disappearing from the bound. Our theory is consistent with the empirical neural scaling laws and verified by numerical simulation.
Read more6/13/2024
0
A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling Laws
Blake Bordelon, Alexander Atanasov, Cengiz Pehlevan
On a variety of tasks, the performance of neural networks predictably improves with training time, dataset size and model size across many orders of magnitude. This phenomenon is known as a neural scaling law. Of fundamental importance is the compute-optimal scaling law, which reports the performance as a function of units of compute when choosing model sizes optimally. We analyze a random feature model trained with gradient descent as a solvable model of network training and generalization. This reproduces many observations about neural scaling laws. First, our model makes a prediction about why the scaling of performance with training time and with model size have different power law exponents. Consequently, the theory predicts an asymmetric compute-optimal scaling rule where the number of training steps are increased faster than model parameters, consistent with recent empirical observations. Second, it has been observed that early in training, networks converge to their infinite-width dynamics at a rate $1/textit{width}$ but at late time exhibit a rate $textit{width}^{-c}$, where $c$ depends on the structure of the architecture and task. We show that our model exhibits this behavior. Lastly, our theory shows how the gap between training and test loss can gradually build up over time due to repeated reuse of data.
Read more6/26/2024
0
Unraveling the Mystery of Scaling Laws: Part I
Hui Su, Zhi Tian, Xiaoyu Shen, Xunliang Cai
Scaling law principles indicate a power-law correlation between loss and variables such as model size, dataset size, and computational resources utilized during training. These principles play a vital role in optimizing various aspects of model pre-training, ultimately contributing to the success of large language models such as GPT-4, Llama and Gemini. However, the original scaling law paper by OpenAI did not disclose the complete details necessary to derive the precise scaling law formulas, and their conclusions are only based on models containing up to 1.5 billion parameters. Though some subsequent works attempt to unveil these details and scale to larger models, they often neglect the training dependency of important factors such as the learning rate, context length and batch size, leading to their failure to establish a reliable formula for predicting the test loss trajectory. In this technical report, we confirm that the scaling law formulations proposed in the original OpenAI paper remain valid when scaling the model size up to 33 billion, but the constant coefficients in these formulas vary significantly with the experiment setup. We meticulously identify influential factors and provide transparent, step-by-step instructions to estimate all constant terms in scaling-law formulas by training on models with only 1M~60M parameters. Using these estimated formulas, we showcase the capability to accurately predict various attributes for models with up to 33B parameters before their training, including (1) the minimum possible test loss; (2) the minimum required training steps and processed tokens to achieve a specific loss; (3) the critical batch size with an optimal time/computation trade-off at any loss value; and (4) the complete test loss trajectory with arbitrary batch size.
Read more4/8/2024
🧠
0
Explaining Neural Scaling Laws
Yasaman Bahri, Ethan Dyer, Jared Kaplan, Jaehoon Lee, Utkarsh Sharma
The population loss of trained deep neural networks often follows precise power-law scaling relations with either the size of the training dataset or the number of parameters in the network. We propose a theory that explains the origins of and connects these scaling laws. We identify variance-limited and resolution-limited scaling behavior for both dataset and model size, for a total of four scaling regimes. The variance-limited scaling follows simply from the existence of a well-behaved infinite data or infinite width limit, while the resolution-limited regime can be explained by positing that models are effectively resolving a smooth data manifold. In the large width limit, this can be equivalently obtained from the spectrum of certain kernels, and we present evidence that large width and large dataset resolution-limited scaling exponents are related by a duality. We exhibit all four scaling regimes in the controlled setting of large random feature and pretrained models and test the predictions empirically on a range of standard architectures and datasets. We also observe several empirical relationships between datasets and scaling exponents under modifications of task and architecture aspect ratio. Our work provides a taxonomy for classifying different scaling regimes, underscores that there can be different mechanisms driving improvements in loss, and lends insight into the microscopic origins of and relationships between scaling exponents.
Read more4/30/2024