Scientific QA System with Verifiable Answers
0
✨
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The JACoW Collaboration is a group that manages and implements templates for publishing conference papers.
- The paper provides an overview of the collaboration as of December 2018, including information about the team members responsible for managing the templates.
Plain English Explanation
The JACoW Collaboration is a group of people who work together to create and maintain templates for publishing conference papers. These templates help ensure that papers have a consistent look and format, making it easier for readers to understand and navigate the content.
The collaboration is responsible for managing the templates and implementing them across different conferences and publications. This helps to streamline the publication process and ensure that all papers follow the same guidelines and standards.
The paper provides a brief summary of the JACoW Collaboration as of December 2018, including information about the team members who are responsible for this work. This helps to give readers a better understanding of the people and processes involved in creating and maintaining these important templates.
Technical Explanation
The paper provides an overview of the JACoW (Joint Accelerator Conferences Website) Collaboration as of December 2018. The JACoW Collaboration is responsible for managing and implementing templates for publishing conference papers.
The collaboration is led by a team of individuals, including C. Petit-Jean-Genaz and J. Po, who are responsible for overseeing the development and implementation of the templates. These templates help to ensure a consistent look and format across different conferences and publications, making it easier for readers to navigate and understand the content.
The paper notes that the templates are managed by the collaboration and implemented by the team, but does not provide further details on the specific processes or technologies involved in this work.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a high-level overview of the JACoW Collaboration and its role in managing and implementing templates for conference papers, but does not delve into any deeper analysis or critique of the collaboration's work.
While the paper acknowledges the importance of the collaboration's efforts in ensuring consistent formatting and presentation of conference papers, it does not address any potential challenges or limitations associated with this work. For example, it does not discuss how the collaboration ensures that the templates are adaptable and can accommodate the diverse needs and requirements of different conferences and publications.
Additionally, the paper does not provide any insight into the collaboration's processes for soliciting feedback or input from the broader research community, or how it ensures that the templates remain up-to-date and responsive to evolving standards and best practices in scholarly publishing.
Conclusion
The JACoW Collaboration plays a crucial role in the publication of conference papers, by managing and implementing templates that help to ensure a consistent and accessible presentation of research findings. The collaboration's work helps to streamline the publication process and enhance the overall quality and readability of conference proceedings.
However, the paper provides only a limited and high-level overview of the collaboration's activities, without delving into the details of its processes, challenges, or potential areas for improvement. Further research and analysis would be needed to fully understand the collaboration's impact and potential role in advancing the field of scholarly publishing.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
✨
0
Scientific QA System with Verifiable Answers
Adela Ljaji'c, Milov{s} Kov{s}prdi'c, Bojana Bav{s}aragin, Darija Medvecki, Lorenzo Cassano, Nikola Milov{s}evi'c
In this paper, we introduce the VerifAI project, a pioneering open-source scientific question-answering system, designed to provide answers that are not only referenced but also automatically vetted and verifiable. The components of the system are (1) an Information Retrieval system combining semantic and lexical search techniques over scientific papers (PubMed), (2) a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) module using fine-tuned generative model (Mistral 7B) and retrieved articles to generate claims with references to the articles from which it was derived, and (3) a Verification engine, based on a fine-tuned DeBERTa and XLM-RoBERTa models on Natural Language Inference task using SciFACT dataset. The verification engine cross-checks the generated claim and the article from which the claim was derived, verifying whether there may have been any hallucinations in generating the claim. By leveraging the Information Retrieval and RAG modules, Verif.ai excels in generating factual information from a vast array of scientific sources. At the same time, the Verification engine rigorously double-checks this output, ensuring its accuracy and reliability. This dual-stage process plays a crucial role in acquiring and confirming factual information, significantly enhancing the information landscape. Our methodology could significantly enhance scientists' productivity, concurrently fostering trust in applying generative language models within scientific domains, where hallucinations and misinformation are unacceptable.
Read more7/17/2024
0
Scholarly Question Answering using Large Language Models in the NFDI4DataScience Gateway
Hamed Babaei Giglou, Tilahun Abedissa Taffa, Rana Abdullah, Aida Usmanova, Ricardo Usbeck, Jennifer D'Souza, Soren Auer
This paper introduces a scholarly Question Answering (QA) system on top of the NFDI4DataScience Gateway, employing a Retrieval Augmented Generation-based (RAG) approach. The NFDI4DS Gateway, as a foundational framework, offers a unified and intuitive interface for querying various scientific databases using federated search. The RAG-based scholarly QA, powered by a Large Language Model (LLM), facilitates dynamic interaction with search results, enhancing filtering capabilities and fostering a conversational engagement with the Gateway search. The effectiveness of both the Gateway and the scholarly QA system is demonstrated through experimental analysis.
Read more6/12/2024
0
VERA: Validation and Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Systems
Tianyu Ding, Adi Banerjee, Laurent Mombaerts, Yunhong Li, Tarik Borogovac, Juan Pablo De la Cruz Weinstein
The increasing use of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems in various applications necessitates stringent protocols to ensure RAG systems accuracy, safety, and alignment with user intentions. In this paper, we introduce VERA (Validation and Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Systems), a framework designed to enhance the transparency and reliability of outputs from large language models (LLMs) that utilize retrieved information. VERA improves the way we evaluate RAG systems in two important ways: (1) it introduces a cross-encoder based mechanism that encompasses a set of multidimensional metrics into a single comprehensive ranking score, addressing the challenge of prioritizing individual metrics, and (2) it employs Bootstrap statistics on LLM-based metrics across the document repository to establish confidence bounds, ensuring the repositorys topical coverage and improving the overall reliability of retrieval systems. Through several use cases, we demonstrate how VERA can strengthen decision-making processes and trust in AI applications. Our findings not only contribute to the theoretical understanding of LLM-based RAG evaluation metric but also promote the practical implementation of responsible AI systems, marking a significant advancement in the development of reliable and transparent generative AI technologies.
Read more9/9/2024
0
How do you know that? Teaching Generative Language Models to Reference Answers to Biomedical Questions
Bojana Bav{s}aragin, Adela Ljaji'c, Darija Medvecki, Lorenzo Cassano, Milov{s} Kov{s}prdi'c, Nikola Milov{s}evi'c
Large language models (LLMs) have recently become the leading source of answers for users' questions online. Despite their ability to offer eloquent answers, their accuracy and reliability can pose a significant challenge. This is especially true for sensitive domains such as biomedicine, where there is a higher need for factually correct answers. This paper introduces a biomedical retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system designed to enhance the reliability of generated responses. The system is based on a fine-tuned LLM for the referenced question-answering, where retrieved relevant abstracts from PubMed are passed to LLM's context as input through a prompt. Its output is an answer based on PubMed abstracts, where each statement is referenced accordingly, allowing the users to verify the answer. Our retrieval system achieves an absolute improvement of 23% compared to the PubMed search engine. Based on the manual evaluation on a small sample, our fine-tuned LLM component achieves comparable results to GPT-4 Turbo in referencing relevant abstracts. We make the dataset used to fine-tune the models and the fine-tuned models based on Mistral-7B-instruct-v0.1 and v0.2 publicly available.
Read more7/9/2024