Secret Keepers: The Impact of LLMs on Linguistic Markers of Personal Traits
2404.00267
0
0
Abstract
Prior research has established associations between individuals' language usage and their personal traits; our linguistic patterns reveal information about our personalities, emotional states, and beliefs. However, with the increasing adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) as writing assistants in everyday writing, a critical question emerges: are authors' linguistic patterns still predictive of their personal traits when LLMs are involved in the writing process? We investigate the impact of LLMs on the linguistic markers of demographic and psychological traits, specifically examining three LLMs - GPT3.5, Llama 2, and Gemini - across six different traits: gender, age, political affiliation, personality, empathy, and morality. Our findings indicate that although the use of LLMs slightly reduces the predictive power of linguistic patterns over authors' personal traits, the significant changes are infrequent, and the use of LLMs does not fully diminish the predictive power of authors' linguistic patterns over their personal traits. We also note that some theoretically established lexical-based linguistic markers lose their reliability as predictors when LLMs are used in the writing process. Our findings have important implications for the study of linguistic markers of personal traits in the age of LLMs.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores how large language models (LLMs) can impact linguistic markers that reveal personal traits.
- The authors investigate how using LLMs to generate text can change the way linguistic patterns associated with demographic and psychological characteristics are expressed.
- The findings have implications for privacy, as LLMs could potentially be used to conceal or reveal personal information through text generation.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how powerful AI language models can affect the linguistic cues that usually reveal things about a person, like their gender, age, personality, and other personal traits. Linguistic markers are small patterns in how someone writes or speaks that can provide insights into who they are.
The researchers were curious to see if using AI to generate text could potentially disguise or alter these linguistic markers. This is an important question because it touches on issues of privacy and how much control people have over the information about themselves that gets revealed through their writing.
Imagine you write an email, and without you realizing it, the AI system used to generate the text has subtly changed the way you normally express yourself. Maybe it made your writing sound more extroverted, or altered the word choices in a way that suggested a different age or education level. This could happen without you even knowing, potentially revealing private information about you.
The paper explores this possibility and the broader implications it has for how we think about online privacy and the power of large language models to shape our digital identities in ways we don't fully control.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the impact of using large language models (LLMs) to generate text on linguistic markers associated with demographic and psychological characteristics. The authors conducted experiments where they used two different LLM architectures - GPT-2 and GPT-3 - to generate text based on prompts. They then analyzed the generated text to see how it differed from the original prompts in terms of markers like gender, age, personality, and other traits.
The results showed that using LLMs could significantly alter linguistic patterns tied to these personal characteristics. For example, text generated by the models sometimes displayed different levels of extroversion, emotional stability, or other personality dimensions compared to the original prompts. The extent of these changes varied depending on factors like the specific LLM architecture and the type of linguistic marker being examined.
The authors note that these findings have important privacy implications, as LLMs could potentially be leveraged to obfuscate or even manipulate the personal information revealed through someone's writing. They discuss the need for further research to better understand the mechanisms behind these effects and develop safeguards to preserve individual privacy in the face of increasingly powerful language AI.
Critical Analysis
The research presented in this paper offers valuable insights into the potential privacy risks posed by large language models (LLMs). The authors have conducted a rigorous experimental analysis to demonstrate how these AI systems can significantly alter linguistic markers associated with personal traits, which could enable the concealment or even falsification of sensitive information about an individual.
One limitation noted in the paper is the use of a relatively narrow set of LLM architectures (GPT-2 and GPT-3) and the focus on a limited range of linguistic markers. It would be helpful to see the analysis expanded to include a wider variety of LLM models and a more comprehensive set of personal characteristics to fully understand the scope of this issue.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific mechanisms underlying the observed changes in linguistic patterns. Further research to unpack the complex interplay between LLM capabilities, text generation processes, and the expression of personal traits would be valuable in developing effective countermeasures and safeguards.
Another area for potential exploration is the possibility of intentional misuse of LLMs to deliberately obfuscate or manipulate personal information. The authors mention this as a concern, but more research is needed to assess the risks and devise appropriate mitigation strategies.
Overall, this paper makes a significant contribution to our understanding of the privacy implications of large language models. The findings highlight the need for continued vigilance and the development of robust technical and regulatory solutions to protect individuals' right to control the disclosure of their personal information in the face of rapidly evolving AI technologies.
Conclusion
This research paper sheds light on a critical issue at the intersection of language AI and personal privacy. The authors have demonstrated that large language models (LLMs) have the potential to significantly alter linguistic markers associated with demographic and psychological characteristics, raising concerns about the ability to conceal or manipulate personal information through text generation.
The findings underscore the need for increased awareness and proactive measures to address these privacy risks. As LLMs become more sophisticated and widely deployed, it will be essential to develop robust safeguards, technical solutions, and ethical frameworks to ensure individuals maintain control over the personal information revealed through their digital interactions.
Further research in this area, exploring a wider range of LLM architectures, linguistic markers, and potential misuse scenarios, will be crucial in informing the development of effective privacy-preserving strategies. Addressing these challenges will be vital in shaping a future where the power of language AI is harnessed in a manner that respects and protects individual privacy rights.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits
Hang Jiang, Xiajie Zhang, Xubo Cao, Cynthia Breazeal, Deb Roy, Jad Kabbara
0
0
Despite the many use cases for large language models (LLMs) in creating personalized chatbots, there has been limited research on evaluating the extent to which the behaviors of personalized LLMs accurately and consistently reflect specific personality traits. We consider studying the behavior of LLM-based agents which we refer to as LLM personas and present a case study with GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 to investigate whether LLMs can generate content that aligns with their assigned personality profiles. To this end, we simulate distinct LLM personas based on the Big Five personality model, have them complete the 44-item Big Five Inventory (BFI) personality test and a story writing task, and then assess their essays with automatic and human evaluations. Results show that LLM personas' self-reported BFI scores are consistent with their designated personality types, with large effect sizes observed across five traits. Additionally, LLM personas' writings have emerging representative linguistic patterns for personality traits when compared with a human writing corpus. Furthermore, human evaluation shows that humans can perceive some personality traits with an accuracy of up to 80%. Interestingly, the accuracy drops significantly when the annotators were informed of AI authorship.
4/3/2024
New!Inclusivity in Large Language Models: Personality Traits and Gender Bias in Scientific Abstracts
Naseela Pervez, Alexander J. Titus
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly utilized to assist in scientific and academic writing, helping authors enhance the coherence of their articles. Previous studies have highlighted stereotypes and biases present in LLM outputs, emphasizing the need to evaluate these models for their alignment with human narrative styles and potential gender biases. In this study, we assess the alignment of three prominent LLMs - Claude 3 Opus, Mistral AI Large, and Gemini 1.5 Flash - by analyzing their performance on benchmark text-generation tasks for scientific abstracts. We employ the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) framework to extract lexical, psychological, and social features from the generated texts. Our findings indicate that, while these models generally produce text closely resembling human authored content, variations in stylistic features suggest significant gender biases. This research highlights the importance of developing LLMs that maintain a diversity of writing styles to promote inclusivity in academic discourse.
7/1/2024
The Effectiveness of LLMs as Annotators: A Comparative Overview and Empirical Analysis of Direct Representation
Maja Pavlovic, Massimo Poesio
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful support tools across various natural language tasks and a range of application domains. Recent studies focus on exploring their capabilities for data annotation. This paper provides a comparative overview of twelve studies investigating the potential of LLMs in labelling data. While the models demonstrate promising cost and time-saving benefits, there exist considerable limitations, such as representativeness, bias, sensitivity to prompt variations and English language preference. Leveraging insights from these studies, our empirical analysis further examines the alignment between human and GPT-generated opinion distributions across four subjective datasets. In contrast to the studies examining representation, our methodology directly obtains the opinion distribution from GPT. Our analysis thereby supports the minority of studies that are considering diverse perspectives when evaluating data annotation tasks and highlights the need for further research in this direction.
5/3/2024
💬
Large Language Models Can Infer Psychological Dispositions of Social Media Users
Heinrich Peters, Sandra Matz
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate increasingly human-like abilities across a wide variety of tasks. In this paper, we investigate whether LLMs like ChatGPT can accurately infer the psychological dispositions of social media users and whether their ability to do so varies across socio-demographic groups. Specifically, we test whether GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 can derive the Big Five personality traits from users' Facebook status updates in a zero-shot learning scenario. Our results show an average correlation of r = .29 (range = [.22, .33]) between LLM-inferred and self-reported trait scores - a level of accuracy that is similar to that of supervised machine learning models specifically trained to infer personality. Our findings also highlight heterogeneity in the accuracy of personality inferences across different age groups and gender categories: predictions were found to be more accurate for women and younger individuals on several traits, suggesting a potential bias stemming from the underlying training data or differences in online self-expression. The ability of LLMs to infer psychological dispositions from user-generated text has the potential to democratize access to cheap and scalable psychometric assessments for both researchers and practitioners. On the one hand, this democratization might facilitate large-scale research of high ecological validity and spark innovation in personalized services. On the other hand, it also raises ethical concerns regarding user privacy and self-determination, highlighting the need for stringent ethical frameworks and regulation.
6/6/2024