Security and Privacy Perspectives of People Living in Shared Home Environments
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Explores the security and privacy concerns of people living in shared home environments
- Examines the perspectives and behaviors of individuals in multi-user households
- Provides insights into how shared home environments impact personal data and device usage
Plain English Explanation
This paper examines the security and privacy concerns of people living in shared home environments, such as rented apartments or houses with roommates. The researchers were interested in understanding how individuals navigate personal data and device usage in these multi-user settings.
Through surveys and interviews, the researchers gained insights into the perspectives and behaviors of people in shared home environments. They found that residents often struggle to balance their own privacy and security needs with those of their housemates or guests.
For example, residents may feel uncomfortable using certain smart home devices or sharing personal information due to concerns about who might have access. They may also worry about the potential for their housemates to interfere with their personal devices or data. At the same time, residents may also take on the role of "bystanders," observing and potentially being impacted by the security and privacy practices of their housemates.
Overall, the study highlights the complex challenges faced by people living in shared home environments and the need for more tailored solutions to address their unique security and privacy concerns.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a mixed-methods study to explore the security and privacy perspectives of people living in shared home environments. They used a combination of online surveys and in-depth interviews to gather data from participants.
The survey portion of the study involved 366 participants, who were asked about their experiences, concerns, and behaviors related to security and privacy in their shared living situations. The researchers also collected demographic information and details about the participants' living arrangements.
In the interview phase, the researchers spoke with 20 participants in-depth to further explore their perspectives and experiences. These interviews provided more nuanced insights into the challenges and coping strategies used by individuals in shared home environments.
Through the analysis of the survey and interview data, the researchers identified several key themes. These include the role of "bystanders" who are impacted by the security and privacy practices of their housemates, the difficulties in managing personal data and devices, and the various strategies people use to navigate these challenges.
The findings of this study contribute to a greater understanding of the security and privacy concerns faced by people living in shared home environments. The researchers suggest that future work should focus on developing more tailored solutions and design considerations to better address the unique needs of these users.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations of their study, such as the potential for self-reporting bias in the survey responses and the relatively small sample size for the in-depth interviews. They also note that the study was conducted in the United States, and the findings may not be fully generalizable to other cultural and geographic contexts.
Additionally, while the study provides valuable insights into the security and privacy perspectives of people in shared home environments, it does not delve deeply into the specific strategies or technologies that could be used to address these challenges. Further research may be needed to explore more practical solutions and design considerations.
Another potential area for further exploration is the role of extended family members and how they might influence or be impacted by the security and privacy practices within shared home environments. The study focuses primarily on housemates, but the involvement of other family members or guests could add an additional layer of complexity to the issue.
Overall, this study makes an important contribution to the understanding of security and privacy challenges in shared home environments. However, there is still much work to be done in developing practical and effective solutions to address the concerns raised by the participants.
Conclusion
This paper provides valuable insights into the security and privacy perspectives of people living in shared home environments. The study highlights the complex challenges faced by individuals as they navigate personal data and device usage in multi-user settings, including the role of "bystanders" and the difficulties in balancing the needs of different housemates.
The findings of this research underscore the importance of considering the unique needs and concerns of people in shared home environments when designing security and privacy solutions. By addressing these issues, researchers and developers can help foster more secure and private experiences for individuals living in shared home settings.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
New!Security and Privacy Perspectives of People Living in Shared Home Environments
Nandita Pattnaik, Shujun Li, Jason R. C. Nurse
Security and privacy perspectives of people in a multi-user home are a growing area of research, with many researchers reflecting on the complicated power imbalance and challenging access control issues of the devices involved. However, these studies primarily focused on the multi-user scenarios in traditional family home settings, leaving other types of multi-user home environments, such as homes shared by co-habitants without a familial relationship, under-studied. This paper closes this research gap via quantitative and qualitative analysis of results from an online survey and content analysis of sampled online posts on Reddit. It explores the complex roles of shared home users, which depend on various factors unique to the shared home environment, e.g., who owns what home devices, how home devices are used by multiple users, and more complicated relationships between the landlord and people in the shared home and among co-habitants. Half (50.7%) of our survey participants thought that devices in a shared home are less secure than in a traditional family home. This perception was found statistically significantly associated with factors such as the fear of devices being tampered with in their absence and (lack of) trust in other co-habitants and their visitors. Our study revealed new user types and relationships in a multi-user environment such as ExternalPrimary-InternalPrimary while analysing the landlord and shared home resident relationship with regard to shared home device use. We propose a threat actor model for shared home environments, which has a focus on possible malicious behaviours of current and past co-habitants of a shared home, as a special type of insider threat in a home environment. We also recommend further research to understand the complex roles co-habitants can play in navigating and adapting to a shared home environment's security and privacy landscape.
Read more9/17/2024
🔎
0
Co-designing Community-based Sharing of Smarthome Devices for the Purpose of Co-monitoring In-home Emergencies
Leena Alghamdi, Mamtaj Akter, Jess Kropczynski, Pamela Wisniewski, Heather Lipford
We conducted 26 co-design interviews with 50 smarthome device owners to understand the perceived benefits, drawbacks, and design considerations for developing a smarthome system that facilitates co-monitoring with emergency contacts who live outside of one's home. Participants felt that such a system would help ensure their personal safety, safeguard from material loss, and give them peace of mind by ensuring quick response and verifying potential threats. However, they also expressed concerns regarding privacy, overburdening others, and other potential threats, such as unauthorized access and security breaches. To alleviate these concerns, participants designed for flexible and granular access control and fail-safe back-up features. Our study reveals why peer-based co-monitoring of smarthomes for emergencies may be beneficial but also difficult to implement. Based on the insights gained from our study, we provide recommendations for designing technologies that facilitate such co-monitoring while mitigating its risks.
Read more4/17/2024
📉
0
It Takes a Village: A Case for Including Extended Family Members in the Joint Oversight of Family-based Privacy and Security for Mobile Smartphones
Mamtaj Akter, Leena Alghamdi, Jess Kropczynski, Heather Lipford, Pamela Wisniewski
We conducted a user study with 19 parent-teen dyads to understand the perceived benefits and drawbacks of using a mobile app that allows them to co-manage mobile privacy, safety, and security within their families. While the primary goal of the study was to understand the use case as it pertained to parents and teens, an emerging finding from our study was that participants found value in extending app use to other family members (siblings, cousins, and grandparents). Participants felt that it would help bring the necessary expertise into their immediate family network and help protect the older adults and children of the family from privacy and security risks. However, participants expressed that co-monitoring by extended family members might cause tensions in their families, creating interpersonal conflicts. To alleviate these concerns, participants suggested more control over the privacy features to facilitate sharing their installed apps with only trusted family members.
Read more4/17/2024
0
Broadening Privacy and Surveillance: Eliciting Interconnected Values with a Scenarios Workbook on Smart Home Cameras
Richmond Y. Wong, Jason Caleb Valdez, Ashten Alexander, Ariel Chiang, Olivia Quesada, James Pierce
We use a design workbook of speculative scenarios as a values elicitation activity with 14 participants. The workbook depicts use case scenarios with smart home camera technologies that involve surveillance and uneven power relations. The scenarios were initially designed by the researchers to explore scenarios of privacy and surveillance within three social relationships involving primary and non-primary users: Parents-Children, Landlords-Tenants, and Residents-Domestic Workers. When the scenarios were utilized as part of a values elicitation activity with participants, we found that they reflected on a broader set of interconnected social values beyond privacy and surveillance, including autonomy and agency, physical safety, property rights, trust and accountability, and fairness. The paper suggests that future research about ethical issues in smart homes should conceptualize privacy as interconnected with a broader set of social values (which can align or be in tension with privacy), and reflects on considerations for doing research with non-primary users.
Read more5/20/2024