Seeking Interpretability and Explainability in Binary Activated Neural Networks
2209.03450
0
0
🧠
Abstract
We study the use of binary activated neural networks as interpretable and explainable predictors in the context of regression tasks on tabular data; more specifically, we provide guarantees on their expressiveness, present an approach based on the efficient computation of SHAP values for quantifying the relative importance of the features, hidden neurons and even weights. As the model's simplicity is instrumental in achieving interpretability, we propose a greedy algorithm for building compact binary activated networks. This approach doesn't need to fix an architecture for the network in advance: it is built one layer at a time, one neuron at a time, leading to predictors that aren't needlessly complex for a given task.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores the use of binary activated neural networks as interpretable and explainable predictors for regression tasks on tabular data.
- It provides guarantees on the expressiveness of these models, and presents an approach for efficiently computing SHAP values to quantify the relative importance of features, hidden neurons, and even weights.
- To maintain simplicity and achieve interpretability, the paper proposes a greedy algorithm for building compact binary activated networks, without the need to fix an architecture in advance.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers in this paper are looking at a specific type of artificial neural network called a binary activated neural network. These networks use simple on/off (binary) activation functions, which makes them more interpretable and easier to understand than traditional neural networks.
The key idea is to use these binary activated networks as predictors for regression problems, which involve predicting a numerical output based on input data. The researchers provide mathematical guarantees showing that these binary networks are able to express a wide range of functions, making them suitable for many real-world regression tasks.
To help understand how these models make their predictions, the researchers present a technique for computing SHAP values. SHAP values quantify the relative importance of each input feature, as well as the importance of individual neurons and even individual weights within the network. This allows users to see which parts of the model are contributing the most to the final prediction.
Since simplicity is crucial for interpretability, the researchers also propose a greedy algorithm to build these binary networks. The algorithm constructs the network one layer and one neuron at a time, ensuring that the final model is not needlessly complex for the given task.
Overall, this work aims to provide a way to build interpretable and explainable machine learning models for regression problems, without sacrificing too much predictive performance.
Technical Explanation
The key technical contributions of the paper are:
-
Expressiveness guarantees: The researchers prove that binary activated neural networks can approximate a wide range of functions, making them suitable for diverse regression tasks. This is an important theoretical result.
-
SHAP value computation: The paper presents an approach to efficiently compute SHAP values for binary activated networks. SHAP values quantify the relative importance of input features, hidden neurons, and even individual weights in the model's predictions. This allows for better interpretability of the model's inner workings.
-
Greedy network construction: To maintain simplicity and interpretability, the researchers propose a greedy algorithm to build the binary activated networks. The algorithm constructs the network one layer and one neuron at a time, avoiding the need to fix the network architecture in advance.
The experiments in the paper demonstrate the effectiveness of the binary activated networks and the proposed techniques on several regression benchmarks. The authors show that these models can achieve competitive predictive performance while providing interpretable explanations of their predictions.
Critical Analysis
One potential limitation of the research is the focus on binary activated networks, which may restrict the model's expressiveness compared to networks with more flexible activation functions. While the authors provide guarantees on the expressiveness of binary networks, it would be interesting to see how their techniques could be extended to networks with other activation functions, potentially offering better predictive performance.
Additionally, the greedy network construction algorithm, while effective, may not always find the optimal network architecture for a given task. It would be valuable to explore alternative network construction methods, potentially incorporating techniques from neural architecture search to further improve the model's performance and interpretability.
Finally, the paper does not extensively discuss the computational complexity and training time of the proposed techniques. As interpretability and explainability are key goals, the practical efficiency of the methods should be carefully evaluated, especially when applying them to large-scale real-world problems.
Conclusion
This paper presents an interesting approach to building interpretable and explainable machine learning models for regression tasks using binary activated neural networks. The key contributions include providing expressiveness guarantees, efficient SHAP value computation, and a greedy network construction algorithm.
While the focus on binary networks may limit the models' flexibility, the proposed techniques offer a promising direction for developing interpretable predictive models that can be easily understood by users. Further research in this area could explore extensions to more flexible activation functions and more efficient network construction methods, ultimately leading to better-performing and more explainable machine learning systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
Interpretable Graph Neural Networks for Tabular Data
Amr Alkhatib, Sofiane Ennadir, Henrik Bostrom, Michalis Vazirgiannis
0
0
Data in tabular format is frequently occurring in real-world applications. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have recently been extended to effectively handle such data, allowing feature interactions to be captured through representation learning. However, these approaches essentially produce black-box models, in the form of deep neural networks, precluding users from following the logic behind the model predictions. We propose an approach, called IGNNet (Interpretable Graph Neural Network for tabular data), which constrains the learning algorithm to produce an interpretable model, where the model shows how the predictions are exactly computed from the original input features. A large-scale empirical investigation is presented, showing that IGNNet is performing on par with state-of-the-art machine-learning algorithms that target tabular data, including XGBoost, Random Forests, and TabNet. At the same time, the results show that the explanations obtained from IGNNet are aligned with the true Shapley values of the features without incurring any additional computational overhead.
4/22/2024
On the Value of Labeled Data and Symbolic Methods for Hidden Neuron Activation Analysis
Abhilekha Dalal, Rushrukh Rayan, Adrita Barua, Eugene Y. Vasserman, Md Kamruzzaman Sarker, Pascal Hitzler
0
0
A major challenge in Explainable AI is in correctly interpreting activations of hidden neurons: accurate interpretations would help answer the question of what a deep learning system internally detects as relevant in the input, demystifying the otherwise black-box nature of deep learning systems. The state of the art indicates that hidden node activations can, in some cases, be interpretable in a way that makes sense to humans, but systematic automated methods that would be able to hypothesize and verify interpretations of hidden neuron activations are underexplored. This is particularly the case for approaches that can both draw explanations from substantial background knowledge, and that are based on inherently explainable (symbolic) methods. In this paper, we introduce a novel model-agnostic post-hoc Explainable AI method demonstrating that it provides meaningful interpretations. Our approach is based on using a Wikipedia-derived concept hierarchy with approximately 2 million classes as background knowledge, and utilizes OWL-reasoning-based Concept Induction for explanation generation. Additionally, we explore and compare the capabilities of off-the-shelf pre-trained multimodal-based explainable methods. Our results indicate that our approach can automatically attach meaningful class expressions as explanations to individual neurons in the dense layer of a Convolutional Neural Network. Evaluation through statistical analysis and degree of concept activation in the hidden layer show that our method provides a competitive edge in both quantitative and qualitative aspects compared to prior work.
4/23/2024
On GNN explanability with activation rules
Luca Veyrin-Forrer, Ataollah Kamal, Stefan Duffner, Marc Plantevit, C'eline Robardet
0
0
GNNs are powerful models based on node representation learning that perform particularly well in many machine learning problems related to graphs. The major obstacle to the deployment of GNNs is mostly a problem of societal acceptability and trustworthiness, properties which require making explicit the internal functioning of such models. Here, we propose to mine activation rules in the hidden layers to understand how the GNNs perceive the world. The problem is not to discover activation rules that are individually highly discriminating for an output of the model. Instead, the challenge is to provide a small set of rules that cover all input graphs. To this end, we introduce the subjective activation pattern domain. We define an effective and principled algorithm to enumerate activations rules in each hidden layer. The proposed approach for quantifying the interest of these rules is rooted in information theory and is able to account for background knowledge on the input graph data. The activation rules can then be redescribed thanks to pattern languages involving interpretable features. We show that the activation rules provide insights on the characteristics used by the GNN to classify the graphs. Especially, this allows to identify the hidden features built by the GNN through its different layers. Also, these rules can subsequently be used for explaining GNN decisions. Experiments on both synthetic and real-life datasets show highly competitive performance, with up to 200% improvement in fidelity on explaining graph classification over the SOTA methods.
6/18/2024
From Neurons to Neutrons: A Case Study in Interpretability
Ouail Kitouni, Niklas Nolte, V'ictor Samuel P'erez-D'iaz, Sokratis Trifinopoulos, Mike Williams
0
0
Mechanistic Interpretability (MI) promises a path toward fully understanding how neural networks make their predictions. Prior work demonstrates that even when trained to perform simple arithmetic, models can implement a variety of algorithms (sometimes concurrently) depending on initialization and hyperparameters. Does this mean neuron-level interpretability techniques have limited applicability? We argue that high-dimensional neural networks can learn low-dimensional representations of their training data that are useful beyond simply making good predictions. Such representations can be understood through the mechanistic interpretability lens and provide insights that are surprisingly faithful to human-derived domain knowledge. This indicates that such approaches to interpretability can be useful for deriving a new understanding of a problem from models trained to solve it. As a case study, we extract nuclear physics concepts by studying models trained to reproduce nuclear data.
5/28/2024