Selective Explanations
2405.19562
0
0
Abstract
Feature attribution methods explain black-box machine learning (ML) models by assigning importance scores to input features. These methods can be computationally expensive for large ML models. To address this challenge, there has been increasing efforts to develop amortized explainers, where a machine learning model is trained to predict feature attribution scores with only one inference. Despite their efficiency, amortized explainers can produce inaccurate predictions and misleading explanations. In this paper, we propose selective explanations, a novel feature attribution method that (i) detects when amortized explainers generate low-quality explanations and (ii) improves these explanations using a technique called explanations with initial guess. Our selective explanation method allows practitioners to specify the fraction of samples that receive explanations with initial guess, offering a principled way to bridge the gap between amortized explainers and their high-quality counterparts.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a framework for selectively explaining the predictions of machine learning models.
- The core idea is to generate explanations that are tailored to the specific needs and preferences of the user, rather than providing a single, generic explanation.
- The proposed approach involves modeling the user's explanation preferences and using this information to select the most relevant and useful explanations for each prediction.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers behind this paper recognized that a "one-size-fits-all" approach to explaining machine learning models often falls short. Different users may be interested in different aspects of a model's behavior, and what might be a helpful explanation for one person may not be as useful for another.
To address this, the researchers developed a framework that allows for Selective Explanations. The key idea is to model the user's preferences for explanations, and then use this information to select the most relevant and useful explanations for each individual prediction.
For example, one user might be primarily interested in understanding the causal relationships behind a model's decision, while another user might be more focused on understanding the relative importance of different input features. The selective explanations framework can tailor the explanations to these different user needs.
This approach builds on previous work in explainable AI, black-box model explanations, and local model explanations. By combining these ideas and modeling user preferences, the researchers aim to provide more Causality-Aware Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations that are tailored to the specific needs of each user.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a framework for Selective Explanations, which involves three main components:
-
Explanation Generation: The researchers use a variety of existing explainability techniques, such as feature importance, counterfactual explanations, and causal explanations, to generate a diverse set of candidate explanations for each model prediction.
-
Explanation Preference Modeling: The framework includes a module that models the user's preferences for different types of explanations. This is done by learning a utility function that captures the user's values and interests.
-
Explanation Selection: Based on the generated candidate explanations and the user's preferences, the framework selects the most relevant and useful explanations to present to the user. This selection process is formulated as an optimization problem, where the goal is to maximize the user's expected utility.
The researchers evaluate their framework on several real-world datasets and demonstrate that it can generate more useful and personalized explanations compared to traditional explainability methods.
Critical Analysis
The Selective Explanations framework represents an important step forward in the field of explainable AI. By modeling user preferences and tailoring explanations accordingly, the approach addresses a key limitation of existing explainability techniques, which often provide a one-size-fits-all explanation that may not be optimal for all users.
However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research:
- The user preference model is assumed to be known a priori, which may not always be the case in practice. Developing effective methods for eliciting and learning user preferences is an important challenge.
- The optimization problem for selecting explanations is computationally expensive, especially as the number of candidate explanations grows. More efficient algorithms may be needed for real-world applications.
- The framework is evaluated on relatively small-scale datasets, and its performance on larger, more complex models and datasets remains to be seen.
- The proposed approach assumes that the user's preferences are static, but in reality, they may evolve over time as the user interacts with the system. Incorporating dynamic user modeling is an interesting direction for future research.
Furthermore, one could raise additional concerns about the potential biases and limitations inherent in the explainability techniques used, and how these may be amplified or propagated through the Selective Explanations framework. Careful consideration of these issues will be important as the field of explainable AI continues to evolve.
Conclusion
The Selective Explanations framework introduces a novel approach to generating customized explanations for machine learning models, tailored to the specific needs and preferences of individual users. By modeling user preferences and using this information to select the most relevant explanations, the framework aims to provide more meaningful and useful insights into model behavior.
While the paper highlights several important limitations and areas for further research, the overall approach represents a significant advancement in the field of explainable AI. As machine learning models become increasingly complex and deployed in high-stakes domains, the ability to provide personalized, user-centric explanations will be crucial for building trust and transparency in these systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📉
T-Explainer: A Model-Agnostic Explainability Framework Based on Gradients
Evandro S. Ortigossa, F'abio F. Dias, Brian Barr, Claudio T. Silva, Luis Gustavo Nonato
0
0
The development of machine learning applications has increased significantly in recent years, motivated by the remarkable ability of learning-powered systems to discover and generalize intricate patterns hidden in massive datasets. Modern learning models, while powerful, often exhibit a level of complexity that renders them opaque black boxes, resulting in a notable lack of transparency that hinders our ability to decipher their decision-making processes. Opacity challenges the interpretability and practical application of machine learning, especially in critical domains where understanding the underlying reasons is essential for informed decision-making. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) rises to meet that challenge, unraveling the complexity of black boxes by providing elucidating explanations. Among the various XAI approaches, feature attribution/importance XAI stands out for its capacity to delineate the significance of input features in the prediction process. However, most existing attribution methods have limitations, such as instability, when divergent explanations may result from similar or even the same instance. In this work, we introduce T-Explainer, a novel local additive attribution explainer based on Taylor expansion endowed with desirable properties, such as local accuracy and consistency, while stable over multiple runs. We demonstrate T-Explainer's effectiveness through benchmark experiments with well-known attribution methods. In addition, T-Explainer is developed as a comprehensive XAI framework comprising quantitative metrics to assess and visualize attribution explanations.
4/26/2024
Provably Better Explanations with Optimized Aggregation of Feature Attributions
Thomas Decker, Ananta R. Bhattarai, Jindong Gu, Volker Tresp, Florian Buettner
0
0
Using feature attributions for post-hoc explanations is a common practice to understand and verify the predictions of opaque machine learning models. Despite the numerous techniques available, individual methods often produce inconsistent and unstable results, putting their overall reliability into question. In this work, we aim to systematically improve the quality of feature attributions by combining multiple explanations across distinct methods or their variations. For this purpose, we propose a novel approach to derive optimal convex combinations of feature attributions that yield provable improvements of desired quality criteria such as robustness or faithfulness to the model behavior. Through extensive experiments involving various model architectures and popular feature attribution techniques, we demonstrate that our combination strategy consistently outperforms individual methods and existing baselines.
6/10/2024
Unified Explanations in Machine Learning Models: A Perturbation Approach
Jacob Dineen, Don Kridel, Daniel Dolk, David Castillo
0
0
A high-velocity paradigm shift towards Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has emerged in recent years. Highly complex Machine Learning (ML) models have flourished in many tasks of intelligence, and the questions have started to shift away from traditional metrics of validity towards something deeper: What is this model telling me about my data, and how is it arriving at these conclusions? Inconsistencies between XAI and modeling techniques can have the undesirable effect of casting doubt upon the efficacy of these explainability approaches. To address these problems, we propose a systematic, perturbation-based analysis against a popular, model-agnostic method in XAI, SHapley Additive exPlanations (Shap). We devise algorithms to generate relative feature importance in settings of dynamic inference amongst a suite of popular machine learning and deep learning methods, and metrics that allow us to quantify how well explanations generated under the static case hold. We propose a taxonomy for feature importance methodology, measure alignment, and observe quantifiable similarity amongst explanation models across several datasets.
5/31/2024
🌐
On Gradient-like Explanation under a Black-box Setting: When Black-box Explanations Become as Good as White-box
Yi Cai, Gerhard Wunder
0
0
Attribution methods shed light on the explainability of data-driven approaches such as deep learning models by uncovering the most influential features in a to-be-explained decision. While determining feature attributions via gradients delivers promising results, the internal access required for acquiring gradients can be impractical under safety concerns, thus limiting the applicability of gradient-based approaches. In response to such limited flexibility, this paper presents methodAbr~(gradient-estimation-based explanation), an approach that produces gradient-like explanations through only query-level access. The proposed approach holds a set of fundamental properties for attribution methods, which are mathematically rigorously proved, ensuring the quality of its explanations. In addition to the theoretical analysis, with a focus on image data, the experimental results empirically demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method over state-of-the-art black-box methods and its competitive performance compared to methods with full access.
5/15/2024