Observation-specific explanations through scattered data approximation

2404.08747

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/16/2024 by Valentina Ghidini, Michael Multerer, Jacopo Quizi, Rohan Sen

📊

Abstract

This work introduces the definition of observation-specific explanations to assign a score to each data point proportional to its importance in the definition of the prediction process. Such explanations involve the identification of the most influential observations for the black-box model of interest. The proposed method involves estimating these explanations by constructing a surrogate model through scattered data approximation utilizing the orthogonal matching pursuit algorithm. The proposed approach is validated on both simulated and real-world datasets.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a method for generating "observation-specific explanations" that assign a score to each data point based on its importance in the prediction process of a black-box model.
  • The proposed approach involves constructing a surrogate model using scattered data approximation and the orthogonal matching pursuit algorithm to estimate these explanations.
  • The method is validated on both simulated and real-world datasets.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a way to understand how a complex machine learning model, known as a "black-box" model, makes its predictions. The authors introduce a technique that can identify the most important data points, or "observations," that the model uses to arrive at its output.

This is done by building a simpler, "surrogate" model that approximates the behavior of the original black-box model. The surrogate model is constructed using a mathematical technique called "scattered data approximation" and an algorithm called "orthogonal matching pursuit."

The resulting explanations provide a score for each data point, indicating how much that point influenced the model's prediction. This can help users better comprehend the inner workings of the black-box model and gain insights into its decision-making process.

The authors test their approach on both artificial and real-world datasets to demonstrate its effectiveness.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a method for generating "observation-specific explanations" that can be used to understand the decision-making process of a black-box machine learning model. The key steps of the proposed approach are:

  1. Construct a surrogate model that approximates the behavior of the original black-box model using scattered data approximation and the orthogonal matching pursuit algorithm. This surrogate model serves as a simplified representation of the complex black-box model.

  2. Leverage the surrogate model to identify the most influential observations, or data points, that contribute the most to the model's predictions. This is done by assigning a score to each observation based on its importance in the prediction process.

  3. Validate the proposed method on both simulated and real-world datasets to demonstrate its effectiveness in providing interpretable explanations for the black-box model's decisions.

The authors argue that these observation-specific explanations can help users better understand the causal relationships and uncertainty-aware factors underlying the black-box model's predictions, leading to improved disentangled explanations and a more comprehensive understanding of the model's decision-making process.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach for providing explanations for black-box models, which can be valuable in building trust and understanding in complex AI systems. However, the authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research:

  1. The proposed method relies on the construction of a surrogate model, which may not always accurately capture the behavior of the original black-box model, especially for highly complex or nonlinear systems.

  2. The authors mention that the effectiveness of the observation-specific explanations may depend on the specific characteristics of the dataset and the black-box model being explained. Further research is needed to understand the broader applicability of the method.

  3. The paper does not address the potential computational overhead or scalability issues that may arise when applying the method to large-scale or high-dimensional datasets.

  4. The authors do not discuss the potential privacy or ethical concerns that may arise when using observation-specific explanations, particularly in sensitive domains such as healthcare or finance.

Overall, the research presents an interesting approach to interpreting black-box models, but further exploration and validation are needed to assess its practical limitations and considerations for real-world deployment.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel method for generating "observation-specific explanations" that can provide insights into the decision-making process of black-box machine learning models. By constructing a surrogate model and identifying the most influential data points, the proposed approach offers a way to better understand the story told by model performance.

The validation on both simulated and real-world datasets demonstrates the potential of this technique to improve the interpretability and explainability of complex AI systems. However, the authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research, which will be important to address for the widespread adoption and responsible use of such explanatory methods.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Selective Explanations

Selective Explanations

Lucas Monteiro Paes, Dennis Wei, Flavio P. Calmon

YC

0

Reddit

0

Feature attribution methods explain black-box machine learning (ML) models by assigning importance scores to input features. These methods can be computationally expensive for large ML models. To address this challenge, there has been increasing efforts to develop amortized explainers, where a machine learning model is trained to predict feature attribution scores with only one inference. Despite their efficiency, amortized explainers can produce inaccurate predictions and misleading explanations. In this paper, we propose selective explanations, a novel feature attribution method that (i) detects when amortized explainers generate low-quality explanations and (ii) improves these explanations using a technique called explanations with initial guess. Our selective explanation method allows practitioners to specify the fraction of samples that receive explanations with initial guess, offering a principled way to bridge the gap between amortized explainers and their high-quality counterparts.

Read more

5/31/2024

Unified Explanations in Machine Learning Models: A Perturbation Approach

Unified Explanations in Machine Learning Models: A Perturbation Approach

Jacob Dineen, Don Kridel, Daniel Dolk, David Castillo

YC

0

Reddit

0

A high-velocity paradigm shift towards Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has emerged in recent years. Highly complex Machine Learning (ML) models have flourished in many tasks of intelligence, and the questions have started to shift away from traditional metrics of validity towards something deeper: What is this model telling me about my data, and how is it arriving at these conclusions? Inconsistencies between XAI and modeling techniques can have the undesirable effect of casting doubt upon the efficacy of these explainability approaches. To address these problems, we propose a systematic, perturbation-based analysis against a popular, model-agnostic method in XAI, SHapley Additive exPlanations (Shap). We devise algorithms to generate relative feature importance in settings of dynamic inference amongst a suite of popular machine learning and deep learning methods, and metrics that allow us to quantify how well explanations generated under the static case hold. We propose a taxonomy for feature importance methodology, measure alignment, and observe quantifiable similarity amongst explanation models across several datasets.

Read more

5/31/2024

📉

Statistics and explainability: a fruitful alliance

Valentina Ghidini

YC

0

Reddit

0

In this paper, we propose standard statistical tools as a solution to commonly highlighted problems in the explainability literature. Indeed, leveraging statistical estimators allows for a proper definition of explanations, enabling theoretical guarantees and the formulation of evaluation metrics to quantitatively assess the quality of explanations. This approach circumvents, among other things, the subjective human assessment currently prevalent in the literature. Moreover, we argue that uncertainty quantification is essential for providing robust and trustworthy explanations, and it can be achieved in this framework through classical statistical procedures such as the bootstrap. However, it is crucial to note that while Statistics offers valuable contributions, it is not a panacea for resolving all the challenges. Future research avenues could focus on open problems, such as defining a purpose for the explanations or establishing a statistical framework for counterfactual or adversarial scenarios.

Read more

5/1/2024

🗣️

Causality-Aware Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations

Martina Cinquini, Riccardo Guidotti

YC

0

Reddit

0

A main drawback of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) approaches is the feature independence assumption, hindering the study of potential variable dependencies. This leads to approximating black box behaviors by analyzing the effects on randomly generated feature values that may rarely occur in the original samples. This paper addresses this issue by integrating causal knowledge in an XAI method to enhance transparency and enable users to assess the quality of the generated explanations. Specifically, we propose a novel extension to a widely used local and model-agnostic explainer, which encodes explicit causal relationships within the data surrounding the instance being explained. Extensive experiments show that our approach overcomes the original method in terms of faithfully replicating the black-box model's mechanism and the consistency and reliability of the generated explanations.

Read more

4/16/2024