Self-Contrast: Better Reflection Through Inconsistent Solving Perspectives
2401.02009
0
0
Abstract
The reflection capacity of Large Language Model (LLM) has garnered extensive attention. A post-hoc prompting strategy, e.g., reflexion and self-refine, refines LLM's response based on self-evaluated or external feedback. However, recent research indicates without external feedback, LLM's intrinsic reflection is unstable. Our investigation unveils that the key bottleneck is the quality of the self-evaluated feedback. We find LLMs often exhibit overconfidence or high randomness when self-evaluate, offering stubborn or inconsistent feedback, which causes poor reflection. To remedy this, we advocate Self-Contrast: It adaptively explores diverse solving perspectives tailored to the request, contrasts the differences, and summarizes these discrepancies into a checklist which could be used to re-examine and eliminate discrepancies. Our method endows LLM with diverse perspectives to alleviate stubborn biases. Moreover, their discrepancies indicate potential errors or inherent uncertainties that LLM often overlooks. Reflecting upon these can catalyze more accurate and stable reflection. Experiments conducted on a series of reasoning and translation tasks with different LLMs serve to underscore the effectiveness and generality of our strategy.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the concept of "self-contrast", which involves reflecting on problem-solving from multiple, potentially inconsistent perspectives to gain deeper insights.
- The researchers investigate how this approach to intrinsic reflection affects the problem-solving capabilities of large language models (LLMs).
- The study examines the impact of self-contrast on LLMs' performance before and after the reflection process, as well as the models' ability to self-evaluate their own problem-solving.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses an approach called "self-contrast" that encourages large language models (LLMs) to reflect on solving problems from different, sometimes conflicting viewpoints. The researchers wanted to see how this type of introspection affects the models' problem-solving abilities and their capacity to evaluate their own performance.
The key idea behind self-contrast is that by considering multiple, potentially inconsistent perspectives on how to tackle a problem, the models can gain a richer, more nuanced understanding of the problem-solving process. This, in turn, could lead to improved performance and a better ability to assess their own work.
The researchers designed experiments to test the effects of self-contrast on LLMs. They measured the models' problem-solving skills before and after the reflection process, as well as their capacity for self-evaluation. The findings provide insights into the potential benefits and limitations of this approach to intrinsic reflection.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores the concept of "self-contrast", which involves encouraging large language models (LLMs) to reflect on problem-solving from multiple, potentially inconsistent perspectives. The researchers investigate how this approach to intrinsic reflection affects the models' problem-solving capabilities and their ability to self-evaluate their own performance.
The study examines the impact of self-contrast on LLMs' performance before and after the reflection process. The researchers also assess the models' capacity for self-evaluation, looking at their ability to accurately assess their own problem-solving abilities.
The experiments involve training LLMs on a range of tasks and then exposing them to the self-contrast reflection process. The researchers measure the models' problem-solving skills both before and after this introspective exercise, as well as their self-evaluation capabilities. The findings provide insights into the potential benefits and limitations of this approach to intrinsic reflection for improving LLM performance and self-assessment.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel approach to intrinsic reflection for large language models, but it also acknowledges several caveats and limitations to the research. One key concern is the potential for the self-contrast process to introduce inconsistencies or biases into the models' problem-solving strategies, which could undermine their overall performance.
Additionally, the researchers note that the self-evaluation capabilities of the LLMs may be influenced by factors beyond just the self-contrast reflection, such as the models' inherent confidence levels or the specific tasks they are asked to assess. Further research would be needed to fully disentangle the various factors at play.
Another area for potential further study is the long-term impact of self-contrast on LLM problem-solving and self-assessment. The current experiments focus on the immediate effects, but it would be valuable to understand how these skills evolve over time and with continued practice.
Overall, the paper provides a thought-provoking exploration of the potential benefits and challenges of using self-contrast to enhance the intrinsic reflection capabilities of large language models. The findings suggest that this approach warrants further investigation, with a focus on addressing the identified limitations and exploring the broader implications for AI system development and deployment.
Conclusion
This paper introduces the concept of "self-contrast", a novel approach to intrinsic reflection for large language models (LLMs). The researchers investigate how encouraging LLMs to consider multiple, potentially inconsistent perspectives on problem-solving can affect their performance and self-evaluation capabilities.
The study's findings suggest that the self-contrast process can have a positive impact on LLM problem-solving skills, but also highlights some potential limitations and areas for further research. Specifically, the researchers note concerns about the introduction of inconsistencies or biases, as well as the complex factors that influence LLMs' self-evaluation abilities.
Overall, the paper provides valuable insights into the potential benefits and challenges of using intrinsic reflection to enhance the capabilities of large language models. The self-contrast approach represents an intriguing avenue for continued exploration in the field of AI development and deployment, with implications for improving the robustness, transparency, and self-awareness of these powerful systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
When Hindsight is Not 20/20: Testing Limits on Reflective Thinking in Large Language Models
Yanhong Li, Chenghao Yang, Allyson Ettinger
0
0
Recent studies suggest that self-reflective prompting can significantly enhance the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, the use of external feedback as a stop criterion raises doubts about the true extent of LLMs' ability to emulate human-like self-reflection. In this paper, we set out to clarify these capabilities under a more stringent evaluation setting in which we disallow any kind of external feedback. Our findings under this setting show a split: while self-reflection enhances performance in TruthfulQA, it adversely affects results in HotpotQA. We conduct follow-up analyses to clarify the contributing factors in these patterns, and find that the influence of self-reflection is impacted both by reliability of accuracy in models' initial responses, and by overall question difficulty: specifically, self-reflection shows the most benefit when models are less likely to be correct initially, and when overall question difficulty is higher. We also find that self-reflection reduces tendency toward majority voting. Based on our findings, we propose guidelines for decisions on when to implement self-reflection. We release the codebase for reproducing our experiments at https://github.com/yanhong-lbh/LLM-SelfReflection-Eval.
4/16/2024
Self-Reflection Outcome is Sensitive to Prompt Construction
Fengyuan Liu, Nouar AlDahoul, Gregory Eady, Yasir Zaki, Bedoor AlShebli, Talal Rahwan
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive zero-shot and few-shot reasoning capabilities. Some propose that such capabilities can be improved through self-reflection, i.e., letting LLMs reflect on their own output to identify and correct mistakes in the initial responses. However, despite some evidence showing the benefits of self-reflection, recent studies offer mixed results. Here, we aim to reconcile these conflicting findings by first demonstrating that the outcome of self-reflection is sensitive to prompt wording; e.g., LLMs are more likely to conclude that it has made a mistake when explicitly prompted to find mistakes. Consequently, idiosyncrasies in reflection prompts may lead LLMs to change correct responses unnecessarily. We show that most prompts used in the self-reflection literature are prone to this bias. We then propose different ways of constructing prompts that are conservative in identifying mistakes and show that self-reflection using such prompts results in higher accuracy. Our findings highlight the importance of prompt engineering in self-reflection tasks. We release our code at https://github.com/Michael98Liu/mixture-of-prompts.
6/18/2024
💬
Supporting Self-Reflection at Scale with Large Language Models: Insights from Randomized Field Experiments in Classrooms
Harsh Kumar, Ruiwei Xiao, Benjamin Lawson, Ilya Musabirov, Jiakai Shi, Xinyuan Wang, Huayin Luo, Joseph Jay Williams, Anna Rafferty, John Stamper, Michael Liut
0
0
Self-reflection on learning experiences constitutes a fundamental cognitive process, essential for the consolidation of knowledge and the enhancement of learning efficacy. However, traditional methods to facilitate reflection often face challenges in personalization, immediacy of feedback, engagement, and scalability. Integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into the reflection process could mitigate these limitations. In this paper, we conducted two randomized field experiments in undergraduate computer science courses to investigate the potential of LLMs to help students engage in post-lesson reflection. In the first experiment (N=145), students completed a take-home assignment with the support of an LLM assistant; half of these students were then provided access to an LLM designed to facilitate self-reflection. The results indicated that the students assigned to LLM-guided reflection reported increased self-confidence and performed better on a subsequent exam two weeks later than their peers in the control condition. In the second experiment (N=112), we evaluated the impact of LLM-guided self-reflection against other scalable reflection methods, such as questionnaire-based activities and review of key lecture slides, after assignment. Our findings suggest that the students in the questionnaire and LLM-based reflection groups performed equally well and better than those who were only exposed to lecture slides, according to their scores on a proctored exam two weeks later on the same subject matter. These results underscore the utility of LLM-guided reflection and questionnaire-based activities in improving learning outcomes. Our work highlights that focusing solely on the accuracy of LLMs can overlook their potential to enhance metacognitive skills through practices such as self-reflection. We discuss the implications of our research for the Edtech community.
6/13/2024
Mirror: A Multiple-perspective Self-Reflection Method for Knowledge-rich Reasoning
Hanqi Yan, Qinglin Zhu, Xinyu Wang, Lin Gui, Yulan He
0
0
While Large language models (LLMs) have the capability to iteratively reflect on their own outputs, recent studies have observed their struggles with knowledge-rich problems without access to external resources. In addition to the inefficiency of LLMs in self-assessment, we also observe that LLMs struggle to revisit their predictions despite receiving explicit negative feedback. Therefore, We propose Mirror, a Multiple-perspective self-reflection method for knowledge-rich reasoning, to avoid getting stuck at a particular reflection iteration. Mirror enables LLMs to reflect from multiple-perspective clues, achieved through a heuristic interaction between a Navigator and a Reasoner. It guides agents toward diverse yet plausibly reliable reasoning trajectory without access to ground truth by encouraging (1) diversity of directions generated by Navigator and (2) agreement among strategically induced perturbations in responses generated by the Reasoner. The experiments on five reasoning datasets demonstrate that Mirror's superiority over several contemporary self-reflection approaches. Additionally, the ablation study studies clearly indicate that our strategies alleviate the aforementioned challenges.
6/26/2024