Self-Reflection Outcome is Sensitive to Prompt Construction
2406.10400
0
0
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive zero-shot and few-shot reasoning capabilities. Some propose that such capabilities can be improved through self-reflection, i.e., letting LLMs reflect on their own output to identify and correct mistakes in the initial responses. However, despite some evidence showing the benefits of self-reflection, recent studies offer mixed results. Here, we aim to reconcile these conflicting findings by first demonstrating that the outcome of self-reflection is sensitive to prompt wording; e.g., LLMs are more likely to conclude that it has made a mistake when explicitly prompted to find mistakes. Consequently, idiosyncrasies in reflection prompts may lead LLMs to change correct responses unnecessarily. We show that most prompts used in the self-reflection literature are prone to this bias. We then propose different ways of constructing prompts that are conservative in identifying mistakes and show that self-reflection using such prompts results in higher accuracy. Our findings highlight the importance of prompt engineering in self-reflection tasks. We release our code at https://github.com/Michael98Liu/mixture-of-prompts.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines how the way a prompt is constructed can impact the self-reflection outcome for language models.
- The researchers conducted experiments to test how different prompt formulations affected the self-reflection process and quality of insights generated by the models.
- The findings have implications for the design of self-reflection tools and prompts used to support reflective learning in language agents.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how the specific wording and structure of a prompt can influence the self-reflection process for language models. Self-reflection is when a model takes a step back to analyze its own thought processes and problem-solving approach. The researchers found that the way the prompt is constructed - the exact instructions and questions given to the model - can significantly affect the quality and depth of the model's self-reflective insights.
For example, a prompt that asks the model to "explain its reasoning" may lead to different results than a prompt asking the model to "critically examine its weaknesses." The researchers tested various prompt formulations and found that some were more effective than others at eliciting thoughtful, nuanced self-reflection from the models.
This is important because self-reflection is a key component of self-contrast and metareflection - processes that allow language models to learn from their own problem-solving experiences. The findings suggest that the design of self-reflection prompts and tools is crucial for supporting reflective learning in language agents.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a series of experiments to investigate how prompt construction affects the self-reflection process and outcomes for language models. They tested various prompt formulations, including differences in question wording, level of specificity, and request for self-analysis versus external evaluation.
The models were asked to complete a problem-solving task and then reflect on their own performance. The researchers analyzed the self-reflection responses to assess factors like depth of insight, identification of strengths/weaknesses, and quality of recommendations for improvement.
The results showed that prompt wording had a significant impact on the self-reflection outcomes. Prompts that encouraged the models to critically examine their own reasoning and decision-making tended to elicit more nuanced, insightful self-reflection compared to prompts focused on external evaluation or general self-assessment.
The findings contribute to a growing body of research on supporting self-reflection at scale and the effects of self-reflection on problem-solving in language models. The researchers highlight the importance of prompt design for facilitating reflective learning and improving the self-awareness of AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into the sensitivity of self-reflection processes to prompt construction, but it also acknowledges some limitations. The experiments were conducted on a specific set of language models and problem-solving tasks, so the findings may not generalize perfectly to all contexts.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the cognitive mechanisms underlying the observed effects. Further research is needed to fully understand how different prompt features influence the self-reflection strategies and metacognitive processes employed by the models.
Another area for further exploration is the long-term impact of self-reflection prompts on model performance and learning. The paper focuses on immediate self-reflection outcomes, but it would be interesting to see how different prompt designs affect the models' ability to retain and apply insights over time.
Despite these caveats, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of self-reflection in language models and provides practical guidance for the design of reflective learning tools and prompts.
Conclusion
This paper demonstrates that the way a self-reflection prompt is constructed can have a substantial impact on the quality and depth of insights generated by language models. The researchers found that prompts encouraging critical self-examination tended to elicit more nuanced, insightful self-reflection compared to prompts focused on external evaluation or general self-assessment.
These findings have important implications for the design of self-reflection tools and the use of prompts to support reflective learning in language agents. By carefully crafting prompts that facilitate critical self-analysis, researchers and developers can enhance the self-awareness and metacognitive capabilities of AI systems, ultimately leading to more robust and adaptable problem-solving abilities.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
When Hindsight is Not 20/20: Testing Limits on Reflective Thinking in Large Language Models
Yanhong Li, Chenghao Yang, Allyson Ettinger
0
0
Recent studies suggest that self-reflective prompting can significantly enhance the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, the use of external feedback as a stop criterion raises doubts about the true extent of LLMs' ability to emulate human-like self-reflection. In this paper, we set out to clarify these capabilities under a more stringent evaluation setting in which we disallow any kind of external feedback. Our findings under this setting show a split: while self-reflection enhances performance in TruthfulQA, it adversely affects results in HotpotQA. We conduct follow-up analyses to clarify the contributing factors in these patterns, and find that the influence of self-reflection is impacted both by reliability of accuracy in models' initial responses, and by overall question difficulty: specifically, self-reflection shows the most benefit when models are less likely to be correct initially, and when overall question difficulty is higher. We also find that self-reflection reduces tendency toward majority voting. Based on our findings, we propose guidelines for decisions on when to implement self-reflection. We release the codebase for reproducing our experiments at https://github.com/yanhong-lbh/LLM-SelfReflection-Eval.
4/16/2024
Self-Contrast: Better Reflection Through Inconsistent Solving Perspectives
Wenqi Zhang, Yongliang Shen, Linjuan Wu, Qiuying Peng, Jun Wang, Yueting Zhuang, Weiming Lu
0
0
The reflection capacity of Large Language Model (LLM) has garnered extensive attention. A post-hoc prompting strategy, e.g., reflexion and self-refine, refines LLM's response based on self-evaluated or external feedback. However, recent research indicates without external feedback, LLM's intrinsic reflection is unstable. Our investigation unveils that the key bottleneck is the quality of the self-evaluated feedback. We find LLMs often exhibit overconfidence or high randomness when self-evaluate, offering stubborn or inconsistent feedback, which causes poor reflection. To remedy this, we advocate Self-Contrast: It adaptively explores diverse solving perspectives tailored to the request, contrasts the differences, and summarizes these discrepancies into a checklist which could be used to re-examine and eliminate discrepancies. Our method endows LLM with diverse perspectives to alleviate stubborn biases. Moreover, their discrepancies indicate potential errors or inherent uncertainties that LLM often overlooks. Reflecting upon these can catalyze more accurate and stable reflection. Experiments conducted on a series of reasoning and translation tasks with different LLMs serve to underscore the effectiveness and generality of our strategy.
6/10/2024
Self-Reflection in LLM Agents: Effects on Problem-Solving Performance
Matthew Renze, Erhan Guven
0
0
In this study, we investigated the effects of self-reflection in large language models (LLMs) on problem-solving performance. We instructed nine popular LLMs to answer a series of multiple-choice questions to provide a performance baseline. For each incorrectly answered question, we instructed eight types of self-reflecting LLM agents to reflect on their mistakes and provide themselves with guidance to improve problem-solving. Then, using this guidance, each self-reflecting agent attempted to re-answer the same questions. Our results indicate that LLM agents are able to significantly improve their problem-solving performance through self-reflection ($p < 0.001$). In addition, we compared the various types of self-reflection to determine their individual contribution to performance. All code and data are available on GitHub at https://github.com/matthewrenze/self-reflection
5/14/2024
💬
Supporting Self-Reflection at Scale with Large Language Models: Insights from Randomized Field Experiments in Classrooms
Harsh Kumar, Ruiwei Xiao, Benjamin Lawson, Ilya Musabirov, Jiakai Shi, Xinyuan Wang, Huayin Luo, Joseph Jay Williams, Anna Rafferty, John Stamper, Michael Liut
0
0
Self-reflection on learning experiences constitutes a fundamental cognitive process, essential for the consolidation of knowledge and the enhancement of learning efficacy. However, traditional methods to facilitate reflection often face challenges in personalization, immediacy of feedback, engagement, and scalability. Integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into the reflection process could mitigate these limitations. In this paper, we conducted two randomized field experiments in undergraduate computer science courses to investigate the potential of LLMs to help students engage in post-lesson reflection. In the first experiment (N=145), students completed a take-home assignment with the support of an LLM assistant; half of these students were then provided access to an LLM designed to facilitate self-reflection. The results indicated that the students assigned to LLM-guided reflection reported increased self-confidence and performed better on a subsequent exam two weeks later than their peers in the control condition. In the second experiment (N=112), we evaluated the impact of LLM-guided self-reflection against other scalable reflection methods, such as questionnaire-based activities and review of key lecture slides, after assignment. Our findings suggest that the students in the questionnaire and LLM-based reflection groups performed equally well and better than those who were only exposed to lecture slides, according to their scores on a proctored exam two weeks later on the same subject matter. These results underscore the utility of LLM-guided reflection and questionnaire-based activities in improving learning outcomes. Our work highlights that focusing solely on the accuracy of LLMs can overlook their potential to enhance metacognitive skills through practices such as self-reflection. We discuss the implications of our research for the Edtech community.
6/13/2024