Selling Joint Ads: A Regret Minimization Perspective
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a novel approach to selling joint ads using a regret minimization perspective.
- The authors develop algorithms that aim to minimize the regret of advertisers when buying bundles of ads.
- The key goal is to design ad auction mechanisms that perform well even when advertisers may not truthfully report their preferences.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on the problem of selling ads in "bundles" - where advertisers can buy a package of multiple ad slots at once. The researchers wanted to find a way to do this that would be fair for the advertisers, even if the advertisers didn't always tell the full truth about how much they valued the different ad slots.
The main idea is to use "regret minimization" - this means designing the ad auction process in a way that minimizes how much any advertiser regrets or wishes they had done something differently.
The researchers developed specific algorithms and auction mechanisms to achieve this goal of low regret for the advertisers. This is important because in real-world ad auctions, advertisers may not always report their true preferences, and the auction system needs to work well even in those cases.
Technical Explanation
The paper studies the problem of selling joint ads - where advertisers can buy bundles of ad slots together, rather than individual slots. The key challenge is that advertisers may not truthfully report their valuations for the different ad slots.
The authors propose a regret minimization approach, where the goal is to design auction mechanisms that perform well in terms of minimizing the maximum regret any advertiser experiences. They develop specific no-regret algorithms for this setting, providing theoretical guarantees on the regret bounds achieved.
The proposed mechanisms work by learning the advertisers' preferences over time, without relying on them reporting truthfully. This allows the auctions to adapt and perform well even when advertisers are strategic in how they bid.
The paper includes a detailed theoretical analysis of the proposed algorithms, including proofs of the regret bounds achieved. It also presents empirical results demonstrating the practical effectiveness of the approaches.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-motivated and technically sophisticated approach to the problem of selling joint ads. The regret minimization perspective is an interesting and principled way to address the issue of strategic advertisers.
One potential limitation is that the theoretical analysis makes some simplifying assumptions, such as the advertisers' valuations being drawn from known distributions. In practice, these distributions may not be known or may change over time, which could impact the performance of the algorithms.
Additionally, the paper focuses on maximizing revenue for the ad platform, but does not explicitly consider the user experience or other broader societal impacts of the ad allocation process. Further research could explore these wider implications.
Overall, this is a technically strong piece of work that makes a valuable contribution to the study of ad auction design. The regret minimization approach is a promising direction for addressing strategic behavior in complex ad marketplaces.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel regret minimization perspective for the problem of selling joint ads. The proposed algorithms aim to minimize the maximum regret experienced by any advertiser, even when they may not truthfully report their preferences.
The theoretical and empirical results demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach, providing a new tool for designing ad auction mechanisms that perform well in the face of strategic advertiser behavior. While the paper focuses on technical aspects, the insights could have important implications for the practical design of ad platforms and their impact on users and society.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Selling Joint Ads: A Regret Minimization Perspective
Gagan Aggarwal, Ashwinkumar Badanidiyuru, Paul Dutting, Federico Fusco
Motivated by online retail, we consider the problem of selling one item (e.g., an ad slot) to two non-excludable buyers (say, a merchant and a brand). This problem captures, for example, situations where a merchant and a brand cooperatively bid in an auction to advertise a product, and both benefit from the ad being shown. A mechanism collects bids from the two and decides whether to allocate and which payments the two parties should make. This gives rise to intricate incentive compatibility constraints, e.g., on how to split payments between the two parties. We approach the problem of finding a revenue-maximizing incentive-compatible mechanism from an online learning perspective; this poses significant technical challenges. First, the action space (the class of all possible mechanisms) is huge; second, the function that maps mechanisms to revenue is highly irregular, ruling out standard discretization-based approaches. In the stochastic setting, we design an efficient learning algorithm achieving a regret bound of $O(T^{3/4})$. Our approach is based on an adaptive discretization scheme of the space of mechanisms, as any non-adaptive discretization fails to achieve sublinear regret. In the adversarial setting, we exploit the non-Lipschitzness of the problem to prove a strong negative result, namely that no learning algorithm can achieve more than half of the revenue of the best fixed mechanism in hindsight. We then consider the $sigma$-smooth adversary; we construct an efficient learning algorithm that achieves a regret bound of $O(T^{2/3})$ and builds on a succinct encoding of exponentially many experts. Finally, we prove that no learning algorithm can achieve less than $Omega(sqrt T)$ regret in both the stochastic and the smooth setting, thus narrowing the range where the minimax regret rates for these two problems lie.
Read more9/14/2024
👨🏫
0
No-Regret Algorithms in non-Truthful Auctions with Budget and ROI Constraints
Gagan Aggarwal, Giannis Fikioris, Mingfei Zhao
Advertisers increasingly use automated bidding to optimize their ad campaigns on online advertising platforms. Autobidding optimizes an advertiser's objective subject to various constraints, e.g. average ROI and budget constraints. In this paper, we study the problem of designing online autobidding algorithms to optimize value subject to ROI and budget constraints when the platform is running any mixture of first and second price auction. We consider the following stochastic setting: There is an item for sale in each of $T$ rounds. In each round, buyers submit bids and an auction is run to sell the item. We focus on one buyer, possibly with budget and ROI constraints. We assume that the buyer's value and the highest competing bid are drawn i.i.d. from some unknown (joint) distribution in each round. We design a low-regret bidding algorithm that satisfies the buyer's constraints. Our benchmark is the objective value achievable by the best possible Lipschitz function that maps values to bids, which is rich enough to best respond to many different correlation structures between value and highest competing bid. Our main result is an algorithm with full information feedback that guarantees a near-optimal $tilde O(sqrt T)$ regret with respect to the best Lipschitz function. Our result applies to a wide range of auctions, most notably any mixture of first and second price auctions (price is a convex combination of the first and second price). In addition, our result holds for both value-maximizing buyers and quasi-linear utility-maximizing buyers. We also study the bandit setting, where we show an $Omega(T^{2/3})$ lower bound on the regret for first-price auctions, showing a large disparity between the full information and bandit settings. We also design an algorithm with $tilde O(T^{3/4})$ regret, when the value distribution is known and is independent of the highest competing bid.
Read more4/16/2024
📉
0
Autobidders with Budget and ROI Constraints: Efficiency, Regret, and Pacing Dynamics
Brendan Lucier, Sarath Pattathil, Aleksandrs Slivkins, Mengxiao Zhang
We study a game between autobidding algorithms that compete in an online advertising platform. Each autobidder is tasked with maximizing its advertiser's total value over multiple rounds of a repeated auction, subject to budget and return-on-investment constraints. We propose a gradient-based learning algorithm that is guaranteed to satisfy all constraints and achieves vanishing individual regret. Our algorithm uses only bandit feedback and can be used with the first- or second-price auction, as well as with any intermediate auction format. Our main result is that when these autobidders play against each other, the resulting expected liquid welfare over all rounds is at least half of the expected optimal liquid welfare achieved by any allocation. This holds whether or not the bidding dynamics converges to an equilibrium.
Read more6/13/2024
🛸
0
Honor Among Bandits: No-Regret Learning for Online Fair Division
Ariel D. Procaccia, Benjamin Schiffer, Shirley Zhang
We consider the problem of online fair division of indivisible goods to players when there are a finite number of types of goods and player values are drawn from distributions with unknown means. Our goal is to maximize social welfare subject to allocating the goods fairly in expectation. When a player's value for an item is unknown at the time of allocation, we show that this problem reduces to a variant of (stochastic) multi-armed bandits, where there exists an arm for each player's value for each type of good. At each time step, we choose a distribution over arms which determines how the next item is allocated. We consider two sets of fairness constraints for this problem: envy-freeness in expectation and proportionality in expectation. Our main result is the design of an explore-then-commit algorithm that achieves $tilde{O}(T^{2/3})$ regret while maintaining either fairness constraint. This result relies on unique properties fundamental to fair-division constraints that allow faster rates of learning, despite the restricted action space. We also prove a lower bound of $tilde{Omega}(T^{2/3})$ regret for our setting, showing that our results are tight.
Read more8/20/2024